Monto Martin A, Supinski Jessica
a Department of Sociology and Social Work , University of Portland , Portland , Oregon , USA.
J Homosex. 2014;61(6):899-916. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2014.870816.
This study describes a creative and psychometrically sound method that allows researchers to measure homonegativity at a lower threshold than existing measures and to differentiate between homonegativity toward gay men and lesbians. Four hundred and thirty-one undergraduate students at a Western comprehensive university were asked to respond to a series of vignettes describing situations in which heterosexuals sometimes experience discomfort in the presence of homosexuals, indicating the degree to which they would feel comfortable or uncomfortable. The 12-item Homonegativity as Discomfort Scale (HADS) has adequate alpha reliability (.92) as well as good criterion and construct validity. Suggestions are made as to how the measure could be employed in research. Testing on this sample shows greater discomfort with gay men than with lesbians and greater discomfort among men than among women.
本研究描述了一种具有创新性且在心理测量方面合理的方法,该方法使研究人员能够以比现有测量方法更低的阈值来测量对同性恋的负面态度,并区分对男同性恋者和女同性恋者的负面态度。一所西方综合性大学的431名本科生被要求对一系列描述异性恋者在同性恋者面前有时会感到不适的情景进行回应,表明他们会感到舒适或不适的程度。由12个项目组成的“作为不适的同性恋负面态度量表”(HADS)具有足够的阿尔法信度(0.92)以及良好的效标效度和结构效度。文中还就该测量方法如何应用于研究提出了建议。对这个样本的测试表明,与女同性恋者相比,人们对男同性恋者感到更不适,而且男性比女性感到更不适。