Butler Max B, Mowforth Oliver D, Badran Abdul, Starkey Michelle, Boerger Timothy, Sadler Iwan, Tabrah Julia, Treanor Caroline, Phys Lucy Cameron Grad Dip, Kalsi-Ryan Sukhvinder, Laing Rodney J, Davies Benjamin M, Kotter Mark R N
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Myelopathy.org, Cambridge, UK.
Global Spine J. 2022 May;12(4):638-645. doi: 10.1177/2192568220961357. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
Cross-sectional survey.
Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common syndrome of acquired spinal cord impairment caused by canal stenosis secondary to arthritic changes of the spine. International guidelines consider physiotherapy an option for mild, stable DCM; however, few studies have been conducted on nonoperative management. The objective was to determine current usage and perceptions of nonoperative physiotherapy for DCM.
Persons with DCM were recruited to a web-based survey. Participants with complete responses that had not received surgery were included (n = 167). Variables included symptom duration, treatment history, current disability, and demographic characteristics.
Disease and demographic characteristics were equivalent between those who did and did not receive physiotherapy. In all, 19.5% of physiotherapy recipients reported subjective benefit from physiotherapy. Those perceiving benefit had significantly higher mJOA (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association) scores, lower neck pain scores, and shorter symptom duration. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, those with mild DCM were more likely to perceive benefit than those with severe DCM, as were those with moderate DCM (to a lesser extent). Individuals whose diagnosis was delayed 1 to 2 years were less likely to perceive benefit than those that waited 0 to 6 months.
The provision of nonoperative physiotherapy in the management of DCM is inconsistent and appears to differ from international guidelines. Few patients perceived benefit from physiotherapy; however, this was more likely in those with mild DCM and in those with shorter symptom durations. Further work is needed to establish the appropriate role of physiotherapy for this population.
横断面调查。
退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)是一种常见的获得性脊髓损伤综合征,由脊柱关节炎性改变继发的椎管狭窄所致。国际指南认为物理治疗是轻度、稳定型DCM的一种选择;然而,关于非手术治疗的研究较少。目的是确定目前DCM非手术物理治疗的使用情况和认知。
招募DCM患者参与一项基于网络的调查。纳入未接受手术且回答完整的参与者(n = 167)。变量包括症状持续时间、治疗史、当前残疾情况和人口统计学特征。
接受和未接受物理治疗的患者在疾病和人口统计学特征方面相当。总体而言,19.5%接受物理治疗的患者报告称从物理治疗中获得了主观益处。认为有益处的患者改良日本骨科协会(mJOA)评分显著更高,颈部疼痛评分更低,症状持续时间更短。在多因素逻辑回归分析中,轻度DCM患者比重度DCM患者更有可能认为有益处,中度DCM患者(程度较轻)也是如此。诊断延迟1至2年的个体比等待0至6个月的个体更不太可能认为有益处。
DCM管理中提供的非手术物理治疗不一致,似乎与国际指南不同。很少有患者认为物理治疗有益;然而,轻度DCM患者和症状持续时间较短的患者更有可能如此。需要进一步开展工作以确定物理治疗在该人群中的适当作用。