Abdel-Azem Hend Mahmoud, Elezz Ahmed Fawzy Abo, Safy Rehab Khalil
Restorative Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Eur J Dent. 2020 Oct;14(4):651-656. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716778. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the Galla chinensis extract (GCE) on early dentin lesion remineralization.
Seventy-two dentin specimens were divided into three groups according to the treatment solution. In group S1, specimens were treated with GCE; in group S2, the specimens were treated with sodium fluoride (NaF); meanwhile, specimens of group S3 were treated with distilled water (DW). Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups according to the treatment time (1 minute and 5 minutes). An pH-cycling model for 12 days was done. Subsequently, surface microhardness (SMH) of the specimens, elemental analysis, and their micromorphological appearance were evaluated.
Data were statistically analyzed. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare numerical (parametric) data between more than two separate groups followed by post hoc Tukey.
There was no significant difference between the mean SMH of dentin between NaF and GCE groups. Regarding the time, the 5-minute treatment with NaF and DW groups recorded higher mean SMH value of dentin than the 1-minute treatment group. Meanwhile, for GCE groups, the 1-minute immersion recorded higher mean SMH value than the 5-minute immersion without any significant difference between them. The microhardness results were confirmed by environmental scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray analysis results.
GCE could be used as an effective alternative for dentin remineralization.
本研究旨在探讨五倍子提取物(GCE)对早期牙本质病变再矿化的疗效。
72个牙本质标本根据处理溶液分为三组。在S1组中,标本用GCE处理;在S2组中,标本用氟化钠(NaF)处理;同时,S3组标本用蒸馏水(DW)处理。每组根据处理时间(1分钟和5分钟)进一步细分为两个亚组。进行了为期12天的pH循环模型实验。随后,评估标本的表面显微硬度(SMH)、元素分析及其微观形态。
对数据进行统计分析。采用单因素方差分析比较两个以上独立组之间的数值(参数)数据,随后进行事后Tukey检验。
NaF组和GCE组牙本质的平均SMH之间无显著差异。关于时间,NaF组和DW组5分钟处理的牙本质平均SMH值高于1分钟处理组。同时,对于GCE组,1分钟浸泡的平均SMH值高于5分钟浸泡,且两者之间无显著差异。显微硬度结果通过环境扫描电子显微镜和能量色散X射线分析结果得到证实。
GCE可作为牙本质再矿化的有效替代物。