Suppr超能文献

蛋白质粉补充剂消费者重金属摄入的人体健康风险评估

A human health risk assessment of heavy metal ingestion among consumers of protein powder supplements.

作者信息

Bandara Suren B, Towle Kevin M, Monnot Andrew D

机构信息

Cardno ChemRisk, 235 Pine Street, Suite 2300, San Francisco, CA, 94104, United States.

出版信息

Toxicol Rep. 2020 Aug 21;7:1255-1262. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.08.001. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Concerns have recently been raised about the presence of heavy metals in protein powder supplements following a Consumer Reports analysis of 15 protein powder products. The Consumer Reports study found that the average amounts of heavy metals in three servings of protein powder per day exceeded the maximum limits in dietary supplements proposed by U.S. Pharmacopeia. In a follow up to the Consumer Reports analysis, another study reported that 40 % of the 133 protein powder products they tested had elevated levels of heavy metals. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether the heavy metal concentrations reported in protein powder supplements posed any human health risks, based on the reported concentrations of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb) in the protein powder. The US EPA reference doses (RfD) for As and Cd, and the EPA screening level for Hg were based on the most sensitive health endpoint which were used to calculate hazard quotients (HQs) for each metal. The 'worse-case scenario' assessment for each protein powder product was expressed as a cumulative hazard index (HI), which is the sum of HQs from each heavy metal. Additionally, we utilized the U.S. EPA's Adult Lead Methodology (ALM) model to estimate adult blood lead levels (BLLs), which were compared to the CDC BLL guidance value of 5 μg/dL. All models assumed one or three servings of protein powder per day. Our results indicate that the exposure concentrations of the studied metals do not pose an increased health risk (Hazard Index < 1). We noted that the protein powder HI was mainly driven by the As or Cd content in each product. Interestingly, the highest HI levels (which approached 1) were found in 'mass gain' type protein powder supplements, whereas the lowest calculated HI levels were in whey protein powders. Moreover, background Pb exposure was the primary contributor to estimated BLLs in adults, and all modeled BLLs were below 5 μg/dL. Overall, our results suggest that the typical intake of dietary supplements would not result in adverse health effects due to heavy metals.

摘要

《消费者报告》对15种蛋白粉产品进行分析后,近期人们开始关注蛋白粉补充剂中重金属的存在情况。《消费者报告》的研究发现,每天三份蛋白粉中的重金属平均含量超过了美国药典建议的膳食补充剂中的最大限量。在跟进《消费者报告》的分析时,另一项研究报告称,他们测试的133种蛋白粉产品中有40%的重金属含量升高。本分析的目的是根据蛋白粉中报告的砷(As)、镉(Cd)、汞(Hg)和铅(Pb)浓度,确定蛋白粉补充剂中报告的重金属浓度是否对人体健康构成任何风险。美国环保署(US EPA)对As和Cd的参考剂量(RfD)以及对Hg的筛查水平是基于最敏感的健康终点,用于计算每种金属的危害商数(HQs)。每种蛋白粉产品的“最坏情况”评估表示为累积危害指数(HI),即每种重金属的HQs之和。此外,我们利用美国环保署的成人铅方法(ALM)模型来估计成人血铅水平(BLLs),并将其与疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)5μg/dL的BLL指导值进行比较。所有模型均假设每天食用一份或三份蛋白粉。我们的结果表明,所研究金属的暴露浓度不会增加健康风险(危害指数<1)。我们注意到,蛋白粉的HI主要由每种产品中的As或Cd含量驱动。有趣的是,“增肌”型蛋白粉补充剂中的HI水平最高(接近1),而计算出的最低HI水平出现在乳清蛋白粉中。此外,背景铅暴露是成人估计BLLs的主要贡献因素,所有模拟的BLLs均低于5μg/dL。总体而言,我们的结果表明,膳食补充剂的典型摄入量不会因重金属而导致不良健康影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b731/7509468/e36e5836e971/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验