Graduate School of Education, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):384-408. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01815-7. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
The literature suggests that semantic similarity has a weak or null effect for immediate serial reconstruction and a facilitative effect for immediate serial recall. These observed semantic similarity effects are inconsistent with the assumptions of short-term memory (STM) models on the detrimental effect of similarity (e.g., confusion) and with observations of a robust detrimental effect of phonological similarity. Our review indicates that the experimental results are likely dependent on the manipulation strength for semantic similarity and that manipulations used in previous studies might have affected semantic assvociation as well as semantic similarity. To address these possible issues, two indices are proposed: (a) strength of manipulation on semantic similarity, gained by quantifying semantic similarity based on Osgood and associates' dimensional view of semantics, and (b) inter-item associative strength, a possible confounding factor. Our review and the results of a meta-regression analysis using these two indices suggest that semantic similarity has a detrimental effect on both serial reconstruction and serial recall, while semantic association, which is correlated with semantic similarity, contributes to an apparent facilitative effect. An effect that is not attributable to similarity or association was also implied. Review on item and order memory further suggests the facilitative effect of semantic association on item memory and the detrimental effect of the semantic similarity on order memory. Based on our findings, we propose a unified explanation of observations of semantic similarity effects for both serial reconstruction and serial recall that is in good accord with STM models.
文献表明,语义相似度对即时串行重构的影响较弱或为零,对即时串行回忆的影响则为促进。这些观察到的语义相似度效应与短期记忆 (STM) 模型关于相似性(如混淆)的有害假设以及关于语音相似性的强大有害影响的观察结果不一致。我们的综述表明,实验结果可能取决于语义相似度的操作强度,并且以前研究中使用的操作可能同时影响了语义联想和语义相似度。为了解决这些可能的问题,我们提出了两个指标:(a)基于 Osgood 及其同事的语义维度观点量化语义相似度所获得的语义相似度操作强度,以及 (b) 项目间联想强度,这是一个可能的混杂因素。我们的综述和使用这两个指标进行的元回归分析结果表明,语义相似度对串行重构和串行回忆都有不利影响,而与语义相似度相关的语义联想则有助于产生明显的促进效应。这也暗示了一种不能归因于相似性或联想的效应。对项目和顺序记忆的综述进一步表明,语义联想对项目记忆有促进作用,而语义相似度对顺序记忆有不利影响。基于我们的发现,我们提出了一个统一的解释,即语义相似度对串行重构和串行回忆的影响与 STM 模型一致。