• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predictive utility of the brief Screener for Substance and Behavioral Addictions for identifying self-attributed problems.简易物质与行为成瘾筛查器识别自我归因问题的预测效用。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Oct 1;9(3):709-722. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00064. Print 2020 Oct 12.
2
Can one simple questionnaire assess substance-related and behavioural addiction problems? Results of a proposed new screener for community epidemiology.一个简单的问卷能否评估物质相关和行为成瘾问题?一项用于社区流行病学的新筛查工具的结果。
Addiction. 2018 Aug;113(8):1528-1537. doi: 10.1111/add.14166. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
3
Psychometric properties of the generalised version of the Screener for Substance and Behavioural Addictions (SSBA-G): A comprehensive screening tool for substance-related and behavioural addictions.广义物质与行为成瘾筛查器(SSBA-G)的心理测量学特性:一种用于物质相关和行为成瘾的全面筛查工具。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Oct;328:115459. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115459. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
4
Social judgments of behavioral versus substance-related addictions: a population-based study.行为成瘾与物质成瘾的社会判断:一项基于人群的研究。
Addict Behav. 2015 Mar;42:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.025. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
5
Co-occurring substance-related and behavioral addiction problems: A person-centered, lay epidemiology approach.并发的物质相关和行为成瘾问题:一种以人为主的、非专业流行病学方法。
J Behav Addict. 2016 Dec;5(4):614-622. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.079. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
6
Co-occurrences of substance use and other potentially addictive behaviors: Epidemiological results from the Psychological and Genetic Factors of the Addictive Behaviors (PGA) Study.物质使用与其他潜在成瘾行为的共病现象:成瘾行为的心理和遗传因素(PGA)研究的流行病学结果。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Jun 26;9(2):272-288. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00033. Print 2020 Jun.
7
Impulsivity traits and addiction-related behaviors in youth.青少年的冲动特质与成瘾相关行为。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Jun 1;7(2):317-330. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.22. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
8
Similarities and Differences in Diagnostic Criterion.诊断标准的异同
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1010:105-132. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5562-1_7.
9
Interaction of Socioeconomic Status with Risky Internet Use, Gambling and Substance Use in Adolescents from a Structurally Disadvantaged Region in Central Europe.社会经济地位与风险互联网使用、赌博和物质使用在中欧结构劣势地区青少年中的相互作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 3;17(13):4803. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134803.
10
Similarities and Differences in Diagnostic Scales.诊断量表的异同
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1010:133-168. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5562-1_8.

引用本文的文献

1
Brazilian version of the Brief Screener for Substance and Behavioral Addiction.《物质与行为成瘾简短筛查量表》巴西版
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 22;16:1642665. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1642665. eCollection 2025.
2
Feel connected to create: Self-reported psychedelic drug users exhibit higher sense of connectedness and better divergent thinking skills compared to non-users.感觉与创作相关:与非使用者相比,自我报告的迷幻药使用者表现出更高的联系感和更好的发散性思维能力。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 11;20(4):e0320755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320755. eCollection 2025.
3
Adverse Childhood Experiences and Problematic Cannabis Use: The Role of Emotion Dysregulation and Affective Impulsivity.童年不良经历与问题性大麻使用:情绪失调和情感冲动的作用。
Cannabis. 2024 Feb 23;6(4):111-126. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2023/000190. eCollection 2024.
4
Network Analysis of Medical Claims Data Suggests Network-Based, Regional Targeting and Intervention Delivery Strategies to Increase Access to Office Based Opioid Treatment (OBOT) for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD).医疗索赔数据分析网络提示以网络为基础的区域性目标定位和干预传递策略,以增加获得基于办公室的阿片类药物治疗(OBOT)治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的机会。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241238422. doi: 10.1177/00469580241238422.
5
Self-perceived substance and behavioral addictions among Jewish Israeli adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间以色列犹太青少年的自我认知物质成瘾和行为成瘾情况
Addict Behav Rep. 2022 May 11;15:100431. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100431. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
The Role of Impulsivity and Reward Deficiency in "Liking" and "Wanting" of Potentially Problematic Behaviors and Substance Uses.冲动性和奖励缺乏在潜在问题行为及物质使用的“喜好”和“渴望”中的作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 25;13:820836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.820836. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Component Model of Addiction Treatment: A Pragmatic Transdiagnostic Treatment Model of Behavioral and Substance Addictions.成瘾治疗的成分模型:行为成瘾和物质成瘾的实用跨诊断治疗模型。
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 31;9:406. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00406. eCollection 2018.
2
Can one simple questionnaire assess substance-related and behavioural addiction problems? Results of a proposed new screener for community epidemiology.一个简单的问卷能否评估物质相关和行为成瘾问题?一项用于社区流行病学的新筛查工具的结果。
Addiction. 2018 Aug;113(8):1528-1537. doi: 10.1111/add.14166. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
3
Clinical neuropsychiatric considerations regarding nonsubstance or behavioral addictions.关于非物质或行为成瘾的临床神经精神学考量
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2017 Sep;19(3):281-291. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2017.19.3/mpotenza.
4
Criteria for conceptualizing behavioural addiction should be informed by the underlying behavioural mechanism.将行为成瘾概念化的标准应以潜在的行为机制为依据。
Addiction. 2017 Oct;112(10):1720-1721. doi: 10.1111/add.13831. Epub 2017 May 11.
5
Behavioural addiction and substance addiction should be defined by their similarities not their dissimilarities.行为成瘾和物质成瘾的定义应基于它们的相似之处,而非不同之处。
Addiction. 2017 Oct;112(10):1718-1720. doi: 10.1111/add.13828. Epub 2017 Apr 16.
6
How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours?如何在不将常见行为病态化的情况下对行为成瘾进行概念化?
Addiction. 2017 Oct;112(10):1709-1715. doi: 10.1111/add.13763. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
7
Sex differences, gender and addiction.性别差异、性别与成瘾
J Neurosci Res. 2017 Jan 2;95(1-2):136-147. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23963.
8
Challenges in Internet Addiction Disorder: Is a Diagnosis Feasible or Not?网络成瘾障碍的挑战:诊断是否可行?
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 6;7:842. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00842. eCollection 2016.
9
Expanding the definition of addiction: DSM-5 vs. ICD-11.拓展成瘾的定义:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版与《国际疾病分类》第11版之比较
CNS Spectr. 2016 Aug;21(4):300-3. doi: 10.1017/S1092852916000183. Epub 2016 May 6.
10
Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research.我们是否过度病态化日常生活?行为成瘾研究的一个合理蓝图。
J Behav Addict. 2015 Sep;4(3):119-23. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.009. Epub 2015 May 27.

简易物质与行为成瘾筛查器识别自我归因问题的预测效用。

Predictive utility of the brief Screener for Substance and Behavioral Addictions for identifying self-attributed problems.

机构信息

1Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.

2Waypoint Research Institute, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, ON, L9M 1G3, Canada.

出版信息

J Behav Addict. 2020 Oct 1;9(3):709-722. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00064. Print 2020 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1556/2006.2020.00064
PMID:33006957
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8943672/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Brief Screener for Substance and Behavioral Addictions (SSBAs) was developed to assess a common addiction construct across four substances (alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and cocaine), and six behaviors (gambling, shopping, videogaming, eating, sexual activity, and working) using a lay epidemiology perspective. This paper extends our previous work by examining the predictive utility of the SSBA to identify self-attributed addiction problems.

METHOD

Participants (N = 6,000) were recruited in Canada using quota sampling methods. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROCs) analyses were conducted, and thresholds established for each target behavior's subscale to predict self-attributed problems with these substances and behaviors. For each substance and behavior, regression models compared overall classification accuracy and model fit when lay epidemiologic indicators assessed using the SSBA were compared with validated screening measures to predict selfattributed problems.

RESULTS

ROC analyses indicted moderate to high diagnostic accuracy (Area under the curves (AUCs) 0.73-0.94) across SSBA subscales. Thresholds for identifying self-attributed problems were 3 for six of the subscales (alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, cocaine, shopping, and gaming), and 2 for the remaining four behaviors (gambling, eating, sexual activity, and working). Compared to other instruments assessing addiction problems, models using the SSBA provided equivalent or better model fit, and overall had higher classification accuracy in the prediction of self-attributed problems.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The SSBA is a viable screening tool for problematic engagement across ten potentially addictive behaviors. Where longer screening tools are not appropriate, the SSBA may be used to identify individuals who would benefit from further assessment.

摘要

背景与目的

Brief Screener for Substance and Behavioral Addictions (SSBAs) 是为了从通俗的流行病学角度评估四种物质(酒精、烟草、大麻和可卡因)和六种行为(赌博、购物、电子游戏、饮食、性行为和工作)的共同成瘾结构而开发的。本文通过考察 SSBA 识别自我归因成瘾问题的预测效用,扩展了我们之前的工作。

方法

使用配额抽样方法在加拿大招募参与者(N=6000)。进行了接收器操作特性(ROC)分析,并为每个目标行为的子量表建立了阈值,以预测这些物质和行为的自我归因问题。对于每种物质和行为,回归模型比较了使用 SSBA 评估的通俗流行病学指标与验证性筛查措施预测自我归因问题时的整体分类准确性和模型拟合。

结果

ROC 分析表明 SSBA 子量表的诊断准确性较高(曲线下面积(AUCs)为 0.73-0.94)。识别自我归因问题的阈值为 3 的有六个子量表(酒精、烟草、大麻、可卡因、购物和游戏),其余四个行为(赌博、饮食、性行为和工作)的阈值为 2。与评估成瘾问题的其他工具相比,使用 SSBA 的模型提供了等效或更好的模型拟合度,并且在预测自我归因问题方面总体具有更高的分类准确性。

讨论与结论

SSBA 是一种可行的筛查工具,可用于评估十种潜在成瘾行为的问题性行为。在不适合使用更长的筛查工具的情况下,可以使用 SSBA 来识别那些需要进一步评估的个体。