Decision Neuroscience Lab, School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Decision Neuroscience Lab, School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Curr Biol. 2020 Nov 16;30(22):4541-4546.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.090. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
In mammalian species, the capacity for goal-directed action relies on a process of cognitive-emotional integration, which melds the causal and incentive learning processes that link action-goal associations with the current value of the goal [1]. Recent evidence suggests that such integration depends on a cortical-limbic-striatal circuit centered on the posterior dorsomedial striatum (pDMS) [2]. Learning-related plasticity has been described at both classes of principal neuron in the pDMS, the direct (dSPNs) and indirect (iSPNs) pathway spiny projection neurons [3-5], and is thought to depend on inputs from prelimbic cortex (PL) [6] and the basolateral amygdala (BLA) [7]. Nevertheless, the relative contribution of these structures to the cellular changes associated with goal-directed learning has not been assessed, nor is it known whether any plasticity specific to the PL and BLA inputs to the pDMS is localized to dSPNs, iSPNs, or both cell types. Here, by combining instrumental conditioning with circuit-specific manipulations and ex vivo optogenetics in mice, we discovered that the PL and not the BLA input to pDMS is pivotal for goal-directed learning and that plasticity in the PL-pDMS pathway was bilateral and specific to dSPNs in the pDMS. Subsequent experiments revealed the BLA is critically but indirectly involved in striatal plasticity via its input to the PL; inactivation of the BLA projection to PL blocked goal-directed learning and prevented learning-related plasticity at dSPNs in pDMS.
在哺乳动物物种中,目标导向行动的能力依赖于认知-情感整合的过程,该过程融合了将行动-目标关联与目标当前价值联系起来的因果和激励学习过程[1]。最近的证据表明,这种整合依赖于一个以背侧后纹状体(pDMS)为中心的皮质-边缘-纹状体回路[2]。pDMS 中的两类主要神经元(直接(dSPNs)和间接(iSPNs)通路棘突投射神经元)都描述了与学习相关的可塑性[3-5],并且被认为依赖于来自前扣带皮层(PL)[6]和基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)[7]的输入。然而,这些结构对与目标导向学习相关的细胞变化的相对贡献尚未得到评估,也不知道 pDMS 中 PL 和 BLA 输入的任何特定于可塑性是否定位于 dSPNs、iSPNs 或这两种细胞类型。在这里,通过在小鼠中结合仪器调节与回路特异性操作和离体光遗传学,我们发现 PL 而不是 BLA 输入到 pDMS 对目标导向学习至关重要,并且 PL-pDMS 通路中的可塑性是双侧的,并且特异性地针对 pDMS 中的 dSPNs。随后的实验表明,BLA 通过其对 PL 的输入而在纹状体可塑性中具有关键但间接的作用;BLA 到 PL 的投射失活阻止了目标导向学习,并防止了 pDMS 中 dSPNs 的学习相关可塑性。