Milam Joan, Johnson Dennis E, Andersen Jeremy C, Fassler Aliza B, Narango Desiree L, Elkinton Joseph S
Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 160 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Private Practice, Eau Claire, WI 54701, USA.
Insects. 2020 Sep 30;11(10):669. doi: 10.3390/insects11100669.
Despite their large size and striking markings, the identification of bumble bees ( spp.) is surprisingly difficult. This is particularly true for three North American sympatric species in the subgenus that are often misidentified: Franklin, Smith Cresson. Traditionally, the identification of these cryptic species was based on observations of differences in hair coloration and pattern and qualitative comparisons of morphological characters including malar length. Unfortunately, these characteristics do not reliably separate these species. We present quantitative morphometric methods to separate these species based on the malar length to width ratio (MRL) and the ratios of the malar length to flagellar segments 1 (MR1) and 3 (MR3) for queens and workers, and validated our determinations based on DNA barcoding. All three measurements discriminated queens of and with 100% accuracy. For workers, we achieved 99% accuracy by combining both MR1 and MR3 measurements, and 100% accuracy differentiating workers using MRL. Moreover, measurements were highly repeatable within and among both experienced and inexperienced observers. Our results, validated by genetic evidence, demonstrate that malar measurements provide accurate identifications of and . There was considerable overlap in the measurements between and . However, these species can usually be reliably separated by combining malar ratio measurements with other morphological features like hair color. The ability to identify bumble bees is key to monitoring the status and trends of their populations, and the methods we present here advance these efforts.
尽管熊蜂体型较大且斑纹醒目,但对其进行鉴别却出奇地困难。对于北美亚属中的三种同域分布物种而言尤其如此,它们经常被误认:富兰克林熊蜂、史密斯熊蜂和克雷森熊蜂。传统上,这些隐性物种的鉴别是基于对毛发颜色和图案差异的观察以及对包括颊长在内的形态特征的定性比较。不幸的是,这些特征并不能可靠地区分这些物种。我们提出了基于颊长与宽度比(MRL)以及蜂王和工蜂的颊长与鞭节1(MR1)和3(MR3)的比率来区分这些物种的定量形态测量方法,并基于DNA条形码验证了我们的鉴别结果。所有这三项测量对富兰克林熊蜂和史密斯熊蜂的蜂王的鉴别准确率均达到100%。对于工蜂,通过结合MR1和MR3测量,我们达到了99%的准确率,而使用MRL区分工蜂的准确率为100%。此外,无论是经验丰富还是缺乏经验的观察者,测量结果在内部和相互之间都具有高度的可重复性。我们的结果经遗传证据验证,表明颊部测量能够准确鉴别富兰克林熊蜂和史密斯熊蜂。富兰克林熊蜂和史密斯熊蜂的测量结果存在相当大的重叠。然而,通常可以通过将颊部比率测量与其他形态特征(如毛发颜色)相结合来可靠地区分这些物种。鉴别熊蜂的能力是监测其种群状况和趋势的关键,我们在此提出的方法推动了这些工作的进展。