School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, 261053, People's Republic of China.
Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Environ Health Prev Med. 2020 Oct 2;25(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12199-020-00896-z.
At the end of 2019, the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severely damaged and endangered people's lives. The public health emergency management system in China has played an essential role in handling the response to the outbreak, which has been appreciated by the World Health Organization and some countries. Hence, it is necessary to conduct an overall analysis of the development of the health emergency management system in China. This can provide a reference for scholars to aid in understanding the current situation and to reveal new research topics.
We collected 2247 international articles from the Web of Science database and 959 Chinese articles from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database. Bibliometric and mapping knowledge domain analysis methods were used in this study for temporal distribution analysis, cooperation network analysis, and co-word network analysis.
The first international article in this field was published in 1991, while the first Chinese article was published in 2005. The research institutions producing these studies mainly existed in universities and health organizations. Developed countries and European countries published the most articles overall, while eastern China published the most articles within China. There were 52 burst words for international articles published from 1999-2018 and 18 burst words for Chinese articles published from 2003-2018. International top-ranked articles according to the number of citations appeared in 2005, 2007, 2009, 2014, 2015, and 2016, while the corresponding Chinese articles appeared in 2003, 2004, 2009, and 2011.
There are differences in the regional and economic distribution of international and Chinese cooperation networks. International research is often related to timely issues mainly by focusing on emergency preparedness and monitoring of public health events, while China has focused on public health emergencies and their disposition. International research began on terrorism and bioterrorism, followed by disaster planning and emergency preparedness, epidemics, and infectious diseases. China considered severe acute respiratory syndrome as the starting research background and the legal system construction as the research starting point, which was followed by the mechanism, structure, system, and training abroad for public health emergency management.
2019 年底，新型冠状病毒病（COVID-19）的爆发严重损害和危及人们的生命。中国的公共卫生应急管理体系在应对疫情的反应中发挥了重要作用，这得到了世界卫生组织和一些国家的赞赏。因此，有必要对中国卫生应急管理体系的发展进行全面分析。这可以为学者提供参考，帮助他们了解现状，并揭示新的研究课题。
我们从 Web of Science 数据库中收集了 2247 篇国际文章，从中国国家知识基础设施数据库中收集了 959 篇中文文章。本研究采用文献计量学和映射知识领域分析方法进行时间分布分析、合作网络分析和共词网络分析。
该领域的第一篇国际文章发表于 1991 年，而第一篇中文文章发表于 2005 年。产生这些研究的研究机构主要存在于大学和卫生组织中。总体而言，发达国家和欧洲国家发表的文章最多，而中国东部地区发表的文章最多。1999-2018 年发表的国际文章有 52 个爆发词，2003-2018 年发表的中文文章有 18 个爆发词。根据引用次数排名的国际顶级文章出现在 2005 年、2007 年、2009 年、2014 年、2015 年和 2016 年，而相应的中文文章出现在 2003 年、2004 年、2009 年和 2011 年。
国际和中国合作网络的区域和经济分布存在差异。国际研究往往与紧急情况有关，主要侧重于公共卫生事件的应急准备和监测，而中国则侧重于公共卫生突发事件及其处置。国际研究始于恐怖主义和生物恐怖主义，其次是灾害规划和应急准备、流行病和传染病。中国将严重急性呼吸系统综合征视为研究背景的起点，将法律制度建设作为研究的起点，随后是公共卫生应急管理的国外机制、结构、系统和培训。
