• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于知识领域可视化的中西方风险沟通文献对比分析

A comparative analysis on risk communication between international and Chinese literature from the perspective of knowledge domain visualization.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, No. 7166 Baotong West Street, Weifang, Shandong, 261053, China.

Department of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, No. 157, Health Road, Nangang District, 150081, Harbin, China.

出版信息

Environ Health Prev Med. 2021 May 28;26(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12199-021-00981-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12199-021-00981-x
PMID:34049481
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8162189/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) severely damaged and endangered people's lives at the end of 2019. Risk communication plays an important role in the response to it successfully, which has been appreciated by the World Health Organization. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of risk communication research is necessary, which can understand current research hotspots and reveal new trends.

METHODS

In this study, we collected 1134 international articles from the Web of Science database and 3983 Chinese articles from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database. Bibliometric and mapping knowledge domain analysis methods were used for temporal distribution analysis, cooperation network analysis, co-word network analysis, and burst detection analysis.

RESULTS

The first article in this field was published by western scholars earlier, while the first Chinese article in 2002. Research institutions mainly come from universities. The USA plays a key role in this field. Chinese scholars had a closer cooperation network, but there was less cooperation among domestic institutions. Risk perception, trust, risk management, and risk information had always been the research hotspots in this academic. Trust, sentiment research, and public risk events were essential directions for the future. There are 25 burst words for international articles, while 11 burst words for Chinese articles from 2000 to 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, both domestic and international researchers are concerned about risk communication, risk perception, trust, and risk information. International research on risk communication is systematic and comprehensive relatively. However, Chinese scholars take severe acute respiratory syndrome as the research background and reviewing foreign knowledge as the research starting point. With the purpose of practical and applied research based on a public emergency, the risk communication research lacks continuity in Chinese academy in the past years.

摘要

背景

2019 年底,冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的爆发严重破坏和危及人们的生命。风险沟通在成功应对疫情方面发挥着重要作用,这一点得到了世界卫生组织的赞赏。因此,有必要对风险沟通研究进行全面分析,以了解当前的研究热点并揭示新的趋势。

方法

本研究从 Web of Science 数据库中收集了 1134 篇国际文章,从中国国家知识基础设施数据库中收集了 3983 篇中文文章。采用文献计量学和绘图知识领域分析方法进行时间分布分析、合作网络分析、共词网络分析和突发检测分析。

结果

该领域的第一篇文章由西方学者较早发表,而第一篇中文文章则发表于 2002 年。研究机构主要来自大学。美国在该领域发挥着关键作用。中国学者的合作网络更为密切,但国内机构之间的合作较少。风险感知、信任、风险管理和风险信息一直是该学术领域的研究热点。信任、情绪研究和公共风险事件是未来的重要方向。国际文章有 25 个突发词,而 2000 年至 2020 年的中文文章有 11 个突发词。

结论

总之,国内外研究人员都关注风险沟通、风险感知、信任和风险信息。国际上对风险沟通的研究相对系统全面。然而,中国学者以严重急性呼吸系统综合征为研究背景,以综述国外知识为研究起点。基于公共突发事件的实际应用研究,近年来中国学术界的风险沟通研究缺乏连续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/6af655dd927f/12199_2021_981_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/4a7cd94868f3/12199_2021_981_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/329fa2b38afc/12199_2021_981_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/1fb9ab0eb911/12199_2021_981_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/c5c7652e76f8/12199_2021_981_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/0750f2e792a0/12199_2021_981_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/6e36730683bd/12199_2021_981_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/6af655dd927f/12199_2021_981_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/4a7cd94868f3/12199_2021_981_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/329fa2b38afc/12199_2021_981_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/1fb9ab0eb911/12199_2021_981_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/c5c7652e76f8/12199_2021_981_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/0750f2e792a0/12199_2021_981_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/6e36730683bd/12199_2021_981_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa8/8164305/6af655dd927f/12199_2021_981_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative analysis on risk communication between international and Chinese literature from the perspective of knowledge domain visualization.基于知识领域可视化的中西方风险沟通文献对比分析
Environ Health Prev Med. 2021 May 28;26(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12199-021-00981-x.
2
A comparative study of international and Chinese public health emergency management from the perspective of knowledge domains mapping.从知识领域图谱的角度比较国际和中国的突发公共卫生事件管理。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2020 Oct 2;25(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12199-020-00896-z.
3
Research Progress of Coronavirus Based on Bibliometric Analysis.基于文献计量分析的冠状病毒研究进展。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):3766. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113766.
4
Mapping Trends and Hotspots Regarding Clinical Research on COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research.对 COVID-19 临床研究的趋势和热点进行映射:全球研究的文献计量分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 23;9:713487. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.713487. eCollection 2021.
5
[Analysis of research hotspot and frontier of severe coronavirus disease 2019: visual analysis based on CiteSpace].《2019年重症冠状病毒病研究热点与前沿分析:基于CiteSpace的可视化分析》
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jun;32(6):671-676. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200514-00384.
6
[Visualization analysis on treatment of coronavirus based on knowledge graph].[基于知识图谱的冠状病毒治疗可视化分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Mar;32(3):279-286. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200225-00200.
7
A bibliometric analysis of comparative research on the evolution of international and Chinese green supply chain research hotspots and frontiers.国际与中国绿色供应链研究热点与前沿演进的比较研究的文献计量分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(6):6302-6323. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11947-x. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
8
[Progress of intensive care unit delirium research from 2010 to 2020: analysis based on knowledge visualization].[2010年至2020年重症监护病房谵妄研究进展:基于知识可视化的分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jul;32(7):785-791. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200603-00435.
9
Twenty-Year Span of Global Coronavirus Research Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis.全球冠状病毒研究趋势的二十年跨度:文献计量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 28;17(9):3082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093082.
10
Comparative Study on International Research Hotspots and National-Level Policy Keywords of Dynamic Disaster Monitoring and Early Warning in China (2000-2021).中国动态灾害监测预警的国际研究热点与国家政策关键词的对比研究(2000-2021)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 16;19(22):15107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215107.

引用本文的文献

1
A Visualization Analysis of Crisis and Risk Communication Research Using CiteSpace.基于 Citespace 的危机与风险沟通研究的可视化分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 2;19(5):2923. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052923.

本文引用的文献

1
The public perception of food and non-food related risks of infection and trust in the risk communication during COVID-19 crisis: A study on selected countries from the Arab region.新冠疫情危机期间公众对食品及非食品相关感染风险的认知以及对风险沟通的信任:对阿拉伯地区部分国家的研究
Food Control. 2021 Mar;121:107617. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107617. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
Analysis of knowledge bases and research hotspots of coronavirus from the perspective of mapping knowledge domain.基于知识图谱视角的冠状病毒知识库与研究热点分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 29;99(22):e20378. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020378.
3
Effective Risk Communication for Public Health Emergency: Reflection on the COVID-19 (2019-nCoV) Outbreak in Wuhan, China.
公共卫生突发事件中的有效风险沟通:对中国武汉新冠疫情(2019 - 新型冠状病毒)的反思。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Mar 21;8(1):64. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010064.
4
The accuracy of depression risk perception in high risk Canadians.高危加拿大人群对抑郁风险的感知准确性。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:410-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.099. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
5
The Impact of Social Media on Risk Communication of Disasters-A Comparative Study Based on Weibo Blogs Related to Tianjin Explosion and Typhoon Pigeon.社交媒体对灾害风险沟通的影响——基于微博博客的比较研究,以天津爆炸和台风“天鸽”为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;17(3):883. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030883.
6
A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern.一场引发全球卫生关注的新型冠状病毒疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):470-473. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
7
Trends and Development in Enteral Nutrition Application for Ventilator Associated Pneumonia: A Scientometric Research Study (1996-2018).机械通气相关性肺炎肠内营养应用的趋势与发展:一项科学计量学研究(1996 - 2018年)
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Mar 20;10:246. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00246. eCollection 2019.
8
Determinants of Risk Perception Related to Exposure to Endocrine Disruptors during Pregnancy: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study on French Women.与孕期暴露于内分泌干扰物相关的风险感知决定因素:一项针对法国女性的定性和定量研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 11;15(10):2231. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102231.
9
Exploring the Emerging Evolution Trends of Urban Resilience Research by Scientometric Analysis.基于科学计量分析的城市韧性研究演进趋势探索。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 6;15(10):2181. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102181.
10
Developing a Broadly Applicable Measure of Risk Perception.开发一种广泛适用的风险感知衡量标准。
Risk Anal. 2019 Apr;39(4):777-791. doi: 10.1111/risa.13207. Epub 2018 Oct 2.