Professeur Yves Rolland, Gerontople de Toulouse, 20 rue du Pont Saint Pierre, 31 059 Toulouse, France, Tel: 05 61 77 64 45, E-Mail :
J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(8):812-816. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1440-2.
Guidance aiming at limiting the entry and spread of the COVID-19 have been widely communicated to Long-term Care Facilities (LTCFs). However, no clinical research has investigated their relevance.
Our objective was to compare the guidance applied for the prevention of the COVID-19 epidemic between the LTCFs having been contaminated by COVID-19 and LTCFs having not been contaminated.
A questionnaire was sent and systematically accompanied by phone call to the 132 LTCFs of Haute-Garonne (Occitania region, South-West of France). The questionnaire focused on the preventive measures implemented before March 23, 2020 (first LTCFs contaminated in this area). The questionnaire focused on physician support, implementation of usual guidance (eg, masks, hydro-alcoholic solute used), training on hygiene, containment in residents' rooms and other distancing measures, use of temporary workers, compartmentalization within zones of residents and staff and a self-assessment analogic scale on the quality of the application of the preventive measures. We compared implementation of the guidance between the LTCFs with at least one case of COVID-19 among residents and/or health care professionals and LTCFs without COVID-19 case (between March 23rd and May 6th).
124 LTCFs participated (93.9%). 30 LTCFs (24.19%) were contaminated with COVID-19. Large heterogeneity of the application of the guidance was observed. Public LTCFs (OR= 0.39 (0.20-0.73), LTCFs which organized staff compartmentalization within zones (OR= 0.19 (0.07-0.48)), and LTCF with a staff who self-assessed a higher quality implementation of the preventive measures (OR= 0.65 (0.43-0.98)) were significantly more likely to avoid contamination by the COVID-19 outbreak.
Our study supports the relevance of guidance to prevent the entry of COVID-19, in particular the staff compartmentalization within zones, as well as the perception of the staff regarding the quality of implementation of those measures in LTCFs.
旨在限制 COVID-19 进入和传播的指南已广泛传达给长期护理机构 (LTCFs)。 然而,没有临床研究调查过它们的相关性。
我们的目的是比较已被 COVID-19 污染的长期护理机构与未被污染的长期护理机构在预防 COVID-19 疫情方面的指南应用。
向 Haute-Garonne (法国西南部奥克西塔尼地区) 的 132 家长期护理机构发送并系统地通过电话提供了一份问卷。 问卷重点关注 2020 年 3 月 23 日之前实施的预防措施(该地区第一批被污染的长期护理机构)。 问卷重点关注医生支持、实施常规指导(例如,口罩、使用的醇基消毒剂)、卫生培训、在居民房间内隔离和其他隔离措施、使用临时工、在居民和工作人员区域内分区以及自我评估模拟量表对预防措施的应用质量。 我们比较了至少有一名居民和/或卫生保健专业人员感染 COVID-19 的长期护理机构与没有 COVID-19 病例的长期护理机构(3 月 23 日至 5 月 6 日)之间的指导实施情况。
有 124 家长期护理机构参与(93.9%)。 30 家长期护理机构(24.19%)被 COVID-19 污染。 指导应用的大异质性。 公共长期护理机构(OR=0.39(0.20-0.73))、组织工作人员在区域内分区的长期护理机构(OR=0.19(0.07-0.48))和工作人员自我评估预防措施实施质量较高的长期护理机构(OR=0.65(0.43-0.98))更有可能避免 COVID-19 爆发的污染。
我们的研究支持指导在预防 COVID-19 进入方面的相关性,特别是在区域内工作人员分区方面,以及工作人员对长期护理机构中这些措施实施质量的看法。