UCL Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Office for National Statistics, Newport, UK.
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Mar;2(3):e129-e142. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(20)30065-9. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
Outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have occurred in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) worldwide, but the reasons why some facilities are particularly vulnerable to outbreaks are poorly understood. We aimed to identify factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and outbreaks among staff and residents in LTCFs.
We did a national cross-sectional survey of all LTCFs providing dementia care or care to adults aged 65 years or older in England between May 26 and June 19, 2020. The survey collected data from managers of eligible LTCFs on LTCF characteristics, staffing factors, the use of disease control measures, and the number of confirmed cases of infection among staff and residents in each LTCF. Survey responses were linked to individual-level SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test results obtained through the national testing programme in England between April 30 and June 13, 2020. The primary outcome was the weighted period prevalence of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections in residents and staff reported via the survey. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify factors associated with infection in staff and residents, an outbreak (defined as at least one case of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a resident or staff member), and a large outbreak (defined as LTCFs with more than a third of the total number of residents and staff combined testing positive, or with >20 residents and staff combined testing positive) using data from the survey and from the linked survey-test dataset.
9081 eligible wLTCFs were identified, of which 5126 (56·4%) participated in the survey, providing data on 160 033 residents and 248 594 staff members. The weighted period prevalence of infection was 10·5% (95% CI 9·9-11·1) in residents and 3·8% (3·4-4·2) in staff members. 2724 (53·1%) LTCFs reported outbreaks, and 469 (9·1%) LTCFs reported large outbreaks. The odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection in residents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0·80 [95% CI 0·75-0·86], p<0·0001) and staff (0·70 [0·65-0·77], p<0·0001), and of large outbreaks (0·59 [0·38-0·93], p=0·024) were significantly lower in LTCFs that paid staff statutory sick pay compared with those that did not. Each one unit increase in the staff-to-bed ratio was associated with a reduced odds of infection in residents (0·82 [0·78-0·87], p<0·0001) and staff (0·63 [0·59-0·68], p<0·0001. The odds of infection in residents (1·30 [1·23-1·37], p<0·0001) and staff (1·20 [1·13-1·29], p<0·0001), and of outbreaks (2·56 [1·94-3·49], p<0·0001) were significantly higher in LTCFs in which staff often or always cared for both infected or uninfected residents compared with those that cohorted staff with either infected or uninfected residents. Significantly increased odds of infection in residents (1·01 [1·01-1·01], p<0·0001) and staff (1·00 [1·00-1·01], p=0·0005), and of outbreaks (1·08 [1·05-1·10], p<0·0001) were associated with each one unit increase in the number of new admissions to the LTCF relative to baseline (March 1, 2020). The odds of infection in residents (1·19 [1·12-1·26], p<0·0001) and staff (1·19 [1·10-1·29], p<0·0001), and of large outbreaks (1·65 [1·07-2·54], p=0·024) were significantly higher in LTCFs that were for profit versus those that were not for profit. Frequent employment of agency nurses or carers was associated with a significantly increased odds of infection in residents (aOR 1·65 [1·56-1·74], p<0·0001) and staff (1·85 [1·72-1·98], p<0·0001), and of outbreaks (2·33 [1·72-3·16], p<0·0001) and large outbreaks (2·42 [1·67-3·51], p<0·0001) compared with no employment of agency nurses or carers. Compared with LTCFs that did not report difficulties in isolating residents, those that did had significantly higher odds of infection in residents (1·33 [1·28-1·38], p<0·0001) and staff (1·48 [1·41-1·56], p<0·0001), and of outbreaks (1·84 [1·48-2·30], p<0·0001) and large outbreaks (1·62 [1·24-2·11], p=0·0004).
Half of LTCFs had no cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first wave of the pandemic. Reduced transmission from staff is associated with adequate sick pay, minimal use of agency staff, an increased staff-to-bed ratio, and staff cohorting with either infected or uninfected residents. Increased transmission from residents is associated with an increased number of new admissions to the facility and poor compliance with isolation procedures.
UK Government Department of Health and Social Care.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2)的爆发在全球各地的长期护理机构(LTCF)中发生,但有些设施特别容易爆发的原因尚不清楚。我们旨在确定与 LTCF 中的工作人员和居民的 SARS-CoV-2 感染和爆发相关的因素。
我们对 2020 年 5 月 26 日至 6 月 19 日期间在英格兰提供痴呆症护理或护理 65 岁及以上成年人的所有 LTCF 进行了全国性的横断面调查。该调查从合格的 LTCF 经理那里收集了 LTCF 特征、人员配备因素、疾病控制措施的使用情况以及每个 LTCF 中工作人员和居民的确诊感染病例数等数据。调查回复与 2020 年 4 月 30 日至 6 月 13 日期间通过英格兰国家检测计划获得的个体水平的 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测结果相关联。主要结局是通过调查报告的居民和工作人员中经证实的 SARS-CoV-2 感染的加权期患病率。使用调查和相关联的调查-检测数据集的数据,使用多变量逻辑回归模型来确定与工作人员和居民感染、爆发(定义为居民或工作人员中至少有一例 SARS-CoV-2 感染)和大型爆发(定义为 LTCF 中超过三分之一的居民和工作人员总数检测呈阳性,或有超过 20 名居民和工作人员合并检测呈阳性)相关的因素。
确定了 9081 家符合条件的 wLTCF,其中 5126 家(56.4%)参与了调查,提供了 16033 名居民和 248594 名工作人员的数据。居民中的感染加权期患病率为 10.5%(95%CI9.9-11.1),工作人员为 3.8%(3.4-4.2)。2724 家 LTCF 报告了爆发,469 家 LTCF 报告了大型爆发。居民(调整后的优势比[OR]0.80 [95%CI0.75-0.86],p<0.0001)和工作人员(0.70 [0.65-0.77],p<0.0001)的 SARS-CoV-2 感染以及大型爆发(0.59 [0.38-0.93],p=0.024)的可能性显著低于支付工作人员法定病假工资的 LTCF。工作人员与床位的比例每增加一个单位,居民(0.82 [0.78-0.87],p<0.0001)和工作人员(0.63 [0.59-0.68],p<0.0001)的感染可能性就会降低。居民(1.30 [1.23-1.37],p<0.0001)和工作人员(1.20 [1.13-1.29],p<0.0001)的感染以及爆发(2.56 [1.94-3.49],p<0.0001)的可能性在经常或总是同时照顾受感染或未受感染居民的工作人员的 LTCF 中显著更高,而将工作人员与受感染或未受感染的居民分开的 LTCF 中则较低。居民(1.01 [1.01-1.01],p<0.0001)和工作人员(1.00 [1.00-1.01],p=0.0005)以及爆发(1.08 [1.05-1.10],p<0.0001)的感染几率与每个新入住 LTCF 的人数相对于基线(2020 年 3 月 1 日)增加一个单位相关。居民(1.19 [1.12-1.26],p<0.0001)和工作人员(1.19 [1.10-1.29],p<0.0001)的感染以及大型爆发(1.65 [1.07-2.54],p=0.024)的可能性在营利性 LTCF 中显著高于非营利性 LTCF。经常雇用代理护士或护理员与居民(调整后的优势比[aOR]1.65 [1.56-1.74],p<0.0001)和工作人员(aOR 1.85 [1.72-1.98],p<0.0001)的感染以及爆发(2.33 [1.72-3.16],p<0.0001)和大型爆发(2.42 [1.67-3.51],p<0.0001)的可能性显著相关。与不雇用代理护士或护理员的 LTCF 相比,雇用代理护士或护理员的 LTCF 中居民(1.33 [1.28-1.38],p<0.0001)和工作人员(1.48 [1.41-1.56],p<0.0001)的感染以及爆发(1.84 [1.48-2.30],p<0.0001)和大型爆发(1.62 [1.24-2.11],p=0.0004)的可能性显著更高。
在大流行的第一波中,一半的 LTCF 没有 SARS-CoV-2 感染病例。减少工作人员的传播与充分的病假工资、尽量减少使用代理人员、增加工作人员与床位的比例以及工作人员与受感染或未受感染的居民分组有关。从居民传播的增加与设施中新入住人数的增加以及隔离程序遵守情况不佳有关。
英国卫生部和社会保健部。