• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

塑造自动驾驶汽车中的驾驶员-车辆交互:新型车载系统如何满足人类需求。

Shaping driver-vehicle interaction in autonomous vehicles: How the new in-vehicle systems match the human needs.

机构信息

Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, Ningbo, China.

Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2021 Jan;90:103238. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103238. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103238
PMID:33010571
Abstract

Autonomous vehicle (AV) technology has brought a shift in the traditional role of the driver. This paper applies a user-centred design approach to designing a new AV interior to better support drivers. Three empirical studies were conducted, involving a total of 92 drivers (with 44 in Study 1, 12 in Study 2, and 36 in Study 3) to explore user needs and requirements in an AV. In Study 1, safety and comfort, together with a variety of non-driving activities, were identified as the principal concerns about future autonomous vehicles. Based on these findings, Study 2 proposes a new rotatable seating position for AVs, with an in-vehicle information display to facilitate users' activities and situational awareness while driving. Study 3 consists of a series of laboratory simulator evaluation studies, and this indicated that drivers in the proposed design condition had better situational awareness in an AV when dealing with take-over situations. Such findings suggest the possibility of applying rear-facing seats in autonomous vehicles to support in-vehicle non-driving activities. Some specific implications of designs to enhance a driver's situational awareness have also been suggested.

摘要

自动驾驶汽车 (AV) 技术改变了传统驾驶员的角色。本研究采用以用户为中心的设计方法来设计新的 AV 内饰,以更好地支持驾驶员。进行了三项实证研究,共有 92 名驾驶员参与(研究 1 中 44 名,研究 2 中 12 名,研究 3 中 36 名),以探索未来自动驾驶汽车中的用户需求和要求。在研究 1 中,安全性和舒适性以及各种非驾驶活动被确定为未来自动驾驶汽车的主要关注点。基于这些发现,研究 2 提出了一种新的可旋转座椅位置,以及车内信息显示屏,以方便用户在驾驶时的活动和情境感知。研究 3 由一系列实验室模拟器评估研究组成,结果表明,在处理接管情况时,采用建议设计条件的驾驶员在自动驾驶汽车中的情境感知能力更好。这些发现表明,在自动驾驶汽车中应用后排座椅来支持车内非驾驶活动是可能的。还提出了一些增强驾驶员情境感知能力的设计的具体意义。

相似文献

1
Shaping driver-vehicle interaction in autonomous vehicles: How the new in-vehicle systems match the human needs.塑造自动驾驶汽车中的驾驶员-车辆交互:新型车载系统如何满足人类需求。
Appl Ergon. 2021 Jan;90:103238. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103238. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Driver-Automated Vehicle Interaction in Mixed Traffic: Types of Interaction and Drivers' Driving Styles.混合交通中的驾驶员-自动驾驶车辆交互:交互类型和驾驶员的驾驶风格。
Hum Factors. 2024 Feb;66(2):544-561. doi: 10.1177/00187208221088358. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
3
Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.自动驾驶汽车中的驾驶员信任、接受和接管行为:自动驾驶风格和驾驶员驾驶风格的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106238. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106238. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
4
In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles.心跳之间:利用驾驶员的生理变化来判断高度自动化车辆接管的质量。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Oct;131:180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
5
Persona-PhysioSync AV: Personalized Interaction through Personality and Physiology Monitoring in Autonomous Vehicles.人物-生理同步 AV:自动驾驶汽车中的个性和生理监测的个性化交互。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Mar 20;24(6):1977. doi: 10.3390/s24061977.
6
Human-Like Lane Change Decision Model for Autonomous Vehicles that Considers the Risk Perception of Drivers in Mixed Traffic.面向混合交通中驾驶员风险感知的自主车辆类人变道决策模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Apr 16;20(8):2259. doi: 10.3390/s20082259.
7
Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.基于预碰撞场景类型学的自动驾驶车辆与传统车辆碰撞比较。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106281. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106281. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
8
How to Interact with a Fully Autonomous Vehicle: Naturalistic Ways for Drivers to Intervene in the Vehicle System While Performing Non-Driving Related Tasks.如何与全自动驾驶车辆交互:驾驶员在执行非驾驶相关任务时干预车辆系统的自然方式。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 21;21(6):2206. doi: 10.3390/s21062206.
9
Effects of assignments of dedicated automated vehicle lanes and inter-vehicle distances of automated vehicle platoons on car-following performance of nearby manual vehicle drivers.专用自动驾驶车道的分配和自动驾驶车队的车间距对附近手动驾驶车辆驾驶员跟车性能的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Nov;177:106826. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106826. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
10
Driver Take-Over Behaviour Study Based on Gaze Focalization and Vehicle Data in CARLA Simulator.基于 CARLA 模拟器中的注视焦点和车辆数据的驾驶员接管行为研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 19;22(24):9993. doi: 10.3390/s22249993.

引用本文的文献

1
A modification of technology acceptance model for investigating driver-vehicle interaction systems usage.一种用于研究驾驶员与车辆交互系统使用情况的技术接受模型的改进。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 22;20(4):e0322221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322221. eCollection 2025.
2
A matched case-control analysis of autonomous vs human-driven vehicle accidents.自动驾驶汽车与人工驾驶汽车事故的配对病例对照分析。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 18;15(1):4931. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48526-4.
3
Exploring the Timing of Disengagement From Nondriving Related Tasks in Scheduled Takeovers With Pre-Alerts: An Analysis of Takeover-Related Measures.
探讨带预报警的计划接管中非驾驶相关任务的脱离时机:接管相关措施分析。
Hum Factors. 2024 Dec;66(12):2669-2690. doi: 10.1177/00187208231226052. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
A new method to identifying optimal adjustment strategy when the car cockpit is uncomfortable: optimal state distance method.一种在汽车驾驶舱不舒服时识别最优调整策略的新方法:最优状态距离法。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Apr 6;9:e1324. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1324. eCollection 2023.
5
Would You Trust Driverless Service? Formation of Pedestrian's Trust and Attitude Using Non-Verbal Social Cues.你会信任无人驾驶服务吗?使用非言语社会线索形成行人的信任和态度。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 6;22(7):2809. doi: 10.3390/s22072809.