• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A deep learning solution to recommend laboratory reduction strategies in ICU.深度学习在 ICU 中推荐实验室减少策略的解决方案。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Dec;144:104282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104282. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
2
External Validation of a Laboratory Prediction Algorithm for the Reduction of Unnecessary Labs in the Critical Care Setting.在重症监护环境下降低不必要实验室检测的实验室预测算法的外部验证。
Am J Med. 2022 Jun;135(6):769-774. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.12.020. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
3
Machine learning for real-time prediction of complications in critical care: a retrospective study.机器学习实时预测重症监护并发症:一项回顾性研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Dec;6(12):905-914. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30300-X. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
4
Prevalence and Predictability of Low-Yield Inpatient Laboratory Diagnostic Tests.低产量住院实验室诊断检测的流行率和可预测性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910967. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10967.
5
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
6
Predicting intubation for intensive care units patients: A deep learning approach to improve patient management.预测 ICU 患者的插管:一种深度学习方法以改善患者管理。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Jun;186:105425. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105425. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
7
[Prediction of intensive care unit readmission for critically ill patients based on ensemble learning].基于集成学习的危重症患者重症监护病房再入院预测
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Jun 18;53(3):566-572. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.03.021.
8
Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach.基于集成学习方法的重症监护病房患者早期住院病死率预测。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
9
Predicting Abnormal Laboratory Blood Test Results in the Intensive Care Unit Using Novel Features Based on Information Theory and Historical Conditional Probability: Observational Study.基于信息论和历史条件概率的新特征预测重症监护病房异常实验室血液检测结果:观察性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jun 3;10(6):e35250. doi: 10.2196/35250.
10
Optimal intensive care outcome prediction over time using machine learning.利用机器学习预测随时间变化的最佳重症监护结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0206862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206862. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to improve appropriateness of laboratory testing in the intensive care unit: a narrative review.改善重症监护病房实验室检测适宜性的干预措施:一项叙述性综述。
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Jan 15;14(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01244-y.
2
Confidence-based laboratory test reduction recommendation algorithm.基于置信度的实验室检验项目削减推荐算法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 May 10;23(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02187-3.
3
Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Search for New Information Through Routine Laboratory Tests: Systematic Review.通过常规实验室检查利用人工智能搜索新信息:系统评价
JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2022 Dec 23;3(1):e40473. doi: 10.2196/40473. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Building the Model.建立模型。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2023 Jul 1;147(7):826-836. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0635-RA.
5
Predicting Abnormal Laboratory Blood Test Results in the Intensive Care Unit Using Novel Features Based on Information Theory and Historical Conditional Probability: Observational Study.基于信息论和历史条件概率的新特征预测重症监护病房异常实验室血液检测结果:观察性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jun 3;10(6):e35250. doi: 10.2196/35250.
6
Use of Machine Learning and Routine Laboratory Tests for Diabetes Mellitus Screening.使用机器学习和常规实验室检测进行糖尿病筛查。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Mar 29;2022:8114049. doi: 10.1155/2022/8114049. eCollection 2022.
7
External Validation of a Laboratory Prediction Algorithm for the Reduction of Unnecessary Labs in the Critical Care Setting.在重症监护环境下降低不必要实验室检测的实验室预测算法的外部验证。
Am J Med. 2022 Jun;135(6):769-774. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.12.020. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Predict or draw blood: An integrated method to reduce lab tests.预测还是抽血:一种减少实验室检测的综合方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Apr;104:103394. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103394. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
2
Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings.美国医疗体系中的浪费:估计成本和节约潜力。
JAMA. 2019 Oct 15;322(15):1501-1509. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13978.
3
Prevalence and Predictability of Low-Yield Inpatient Laboratory Diagnostic Tests.低产量住院实验室诊断检测的流行率和可预测性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910967. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10967.
4
Association of a Multifaceted Intervention With Ordering of Unnecessary Laboratory Tests Among Caregivers in Internal Medicine Departments.多方面干预措施与内科护理人员开具不必要实验室检查医嘱之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197577. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7577.
5
A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting the Stability of Inpatient Lab Test Results.一种预测住院患者实验室检查结果稳定性的机器学习方法。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019 May 6;2019:515-523. eCollection 2019.
6
Strategies to reduce inappropriate laboratory blood test orders in intensive care are effective and safe: a before-and-after quality improvement study.减少重症监护中不适当实验室血液检查医嘱的策略是有效且安全的:一项前后对比的质量改进研究。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018 May;46(3):313-320. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1804600309.
7
Evidence-Based Guidelines to Eliminate Repetitive Laboratory Testing.基于证据的消除实验室重复检测指南。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1833-1839. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5152.
8
Hospital-acquired anemia due to diagnostic and therapy-related blood loss in inpatients with myasthenia gravis receiving therapeutic plasma exchange.接受治疗性血浆置换的重症肌无力住院患者因诊断和治疗相关失血导致的医院获得性贫血。
J Clin Apher. 2018 Feb;33(1):14-20. doi: 10.1002/jca.21554. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
9
High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care: Iterative Systems-Based Interventions to Reduce Unnecessary Laboratory Testing.高价值、成本意识的医疗照护:以系统为基础的迭代干预措施,以减少不必要的实验室检查。
Am J Med. 2017 Sep;130(9):1112.e1-1112.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
10
Reducing Unnecessary Laboratory Testing in the Medical ICU.减少医学重症监护病房中不必要的实验室检查
Am J Med. 2017 Jun;130(6):648-651. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

深度学习在 ICU 中推荐实验室减少策略的解决方案。

A deep learning solution to recommend laboratory reduction strategies in ICU.

机构信息

School of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth, United States; Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University, China.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, United States.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2020 Dec;144:104282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104282. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104282
PMID:33010730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10777357/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To build a machine-learning model that predicts laboratory test results and provides a promising lab test reduction strategy, using spatial-temporal correlations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We developed a global prediction model to treat laboratory testing as a series of decisions by considering contextual information over time and across modalities. We validated our method using a critical care database (MIMIC III), which includes 4,570,709 observations of 12 standard laboratory tests, among 38,773 critical care patients. Our deep-learning model made real-time laboratory reduction recommendations and predicted the properties of lab tests, including values, normal/abnormal (whether labs were within the normal range) and transition (normal to abnormal or abnormal to normal from the latest lab test). We reported area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting normal/abnormal, evaluated accuracy and absolute bias on prediction vs. observation against lab test reduction proportion. We compared our model against baseline models and analyzed the impact of variations on the recommended reduction strategy.

RESULTS

Our best model offered a 20.26 % reduction in the number of laboratory tests. By applying the recommended reduction policy on the hold-out dataset (7755 patients), our model predicted normality/abnormality of laboratory tests with a 98.27 % accuracy (AUC, 0.9885; sensitivity, 97.84 %; specificity, 98.80 %; PPV, 99.01 %; NPV, 97.39 %) on 20.26 % reduced lab tests, and recommended 98.10 % of transitions to be checked. Our model performed better than the greedy models, and the recommended reduction strategy was robust.

DISCUSSION

Strong spatial and temporal correlations between laboratory tests can be used to optimize policies for reducing laboratory tests throughout the hospital course. Our method allows for iterative predictions and provides a superior solution for the dynamic decision-making laboratory reduction problem.

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrates a machine-learning model that assists physicians in determining which laboratory tests may be omitted.

摘要

目的

利用时空相关性构建机器学习模型,预测实验室检测结果,并提供有前景的实验室检测减少策略。

材料和方法

我们开发了一个全局预测模型,通过考虑随时间和模态的上下文信息,将实验室检测视为一系列决策。我们使用包含 38773 名危重症患者的 12 项标准实验室检测的 4570709 个观测值的 MIMIC III 数据库验证了我们的方法。我们的深度学习模型实时提供实验室检测减少建议,并预测实验室检测的特性,包括值、正常/异常(实验室检测值是否在正常范围内)和转变(从最新的实验室检测结果看,正常转为异常或异常转为正常)。我们报告了预测正常/异常的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC),并针对实验室检测减少比例评估了预测与观察的准确性和绝对偏差。我们将我们的模型与基线模型进行了比较,并分析了变化对推荐减少策略的影响。

结果

我们的最佳模型提供了 20.26%的实验室检测减少数量。通过将推荐的减少策略应用于保留数据集(7755 名患者),我们的模型对实验室检测的正常/异常预测的准确率为 98.27%(AUC 为 0.9885;敏感性为 97.84%;特异性为 98.80%;PPV 为 99.01%;NPV 为 97.39%),减少了 20.26%的实验室检测,建议 98.10%的转变需要进行检查。我们的模型优于贪心模型,推荐的减少策略具有鲁棒性。

讨论

实验室检测之间存在很强的空间和时间相关性,可以用于优化整个医院病程中的实验室检测减少策略。我们的方法允许迭代预测,并为动态决策实验室检测减少问题提供了更好的解决方案。

结论

这项工作展示了一种机器学习模型,可以帮助医生确定哪些实验室检测可以省略。