• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童即黑客。

The Child as Hacker.

机构信息

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Nov;24(11):900-915. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.005
PMID:33012688
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7673661/
Abstract

The scope of human learning and development poses a radical challenge for cognitive science. We propose that developmental theories can address this challenge by adopting perspectives from computer science. Many of our best models treat learning as analogous to computer programming because symbolic programs provide the most compelling account of sophisticated mental representations. We specifically propose that children's learning is analogous to a particular style of programming called hacking, making code better along many dimensions through an open-ended set of goals and activities. By contrast to existing theories, which depend primarily on local search and simple metrics, this view highlights the many features of good mental representations and the multiple complementary processes children use to create them.

摘要

人类学习和发展的范围对认知科学提出了根本性的挑战。我们提出,发展理论可以通过采用计算机科学的观点来应对这一挑战。我们最好的许多模型都将学习视为类似于计算机编程,因为符号程序为复杂的心理表征提供了最有说服力的解释。我们特别提出,儿童的学习类似于一种称为黑客攻击的特殊编程风格,通过一系列无限制的目标和活动,在许多方面使代码变得更好。与主要依赖于局部搜索和简单度量的现有理论相比,这种观点突出了良好心理表征的许多特征以及儿童用来创建这些特征的多种互补过程。

相似文献

1
The Child as Hacker.儿童即黑客。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Nov;24(11):900-915. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
On the necessity of U-shaped learning.论 U 型学习的必要性。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan;5(1):56-88. doi: 10.1111/tops.12002.
3
Exploration, Explanation, and Parent-Child Interaction in Museums.博物馆中的探索、解释与亲子互动。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2020 Mar;85(1):7-137. doi: 10.1111/mono.12412.
4
Out-of-school settings as a developmental context for children and youth.校外环境作为儿童和青少年的发展背景。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2005;33:43-77. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(05)80004-7.
5
Representation and Computation in Cognitive Models.认知模型中的表征与计算。
Top Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;9(3):694-718. doi: 10.1111/tops.12277. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
6
Computational modeling in cognitive science: a manifesto for change.认知科学中的计算建模:变革宣言。
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Jul;4(3):332-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01206.x. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
7
[Role of the implicit theories of intelligence in learning situations].[智力的内隐理论在学习情境中的作用]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):456-63. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95460-7.
8
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.婴儿期朴素心理学的发展起源。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.
9
Representing task context: proposals based on a connectionist model of action.呈现任务情境:基于行动联结主义模型的提议。
Psychol Res. 2002 Nov;66(4):298-311. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0103-8. Epub 2002 Nov 7.
10
Towards a rational constructivist theory of cognitive development.迈向一种理性建构主义的认知发展理论。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Nov;126(6):841-864. doi: 10.1037/rev0000153. Epub 2019 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Seeking New Information With Old Questions: Children and Adults Reuse and Recombine Concepts From Prior Questions.用旧问题探寻新信息:儿童与成人对先前问题中的概念进行复用与重组。
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Jul 26;9:885-925. doi: 10.1162/opmi.a.12. eCollection 2025.
2
Building machines that learn and think with people.与人类一起学习和思考的机器。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Oct;8(10):1851-1863. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01991-9. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
3
Symbolic metaprogram search improves learning efficiency and explains rule learning in humans.

本文引用的文献

1
Solving Bongard Problems With a Visual Language and Pragmatic Constraints.用视觉语言和实用约束解决 Bongard 问题。
Cogn Sci. 2024 May;48(5):e13432. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13432.
2
DreamCoder: growing generalizable, interpretable knowledge with wake-sleep Bayesian program learning.DreamCoder:通过清醒-睡眠贝叶斯程序学习生成可泛化、可解释的知识。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Jul 24;381(2251):20220050. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0050. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
3
Logical word learning: The case of kinship.逻辑词学习:以亲属关系为例。
符号元编程搜索提高了学习效率,并解释了人类的规则学习。
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 10;15(1):6847. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50966-x.
4
Fundamental processes in sensorimotor learning: Reasoning, refinement, and retrieval.感觉运动学习的基本过程:推理、优化与检索。
Elife. 2024 Aug 1;13:e91839. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91839.
5
Motor adaptation is reduced by symbolic compared to sensory feedback.与感觉反馈相比,符号反馈会降低运动适应性。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jul 1:2024.06.28.601293. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.28.601293.
6
Language is primarily a tool for communication rather than thought.语言主要是一种交流工具,而不是思维工具。
Nature. 2024 Jun;630(8017):575-586. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07522-w. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
7
Response to Difficulty Drives Variation in IQ Test Performance.对困难的反应导致智商测试表现的差异。
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Mar 26;8:265-277. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00127. eCollection 2024.
8
A model of conceptual bootstrapping in human cognition.人类认知中的概念引导模型。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jan;8(1):125-136. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01719-1. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
9
Developmental changes in exploration resemble stochastic optimization.探索过程中的发展变化类似于随机优化。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Nov;7(11):1955-1967. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01662-1. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
10
Eight-Month-Old Infants Meta-Learn by Downweighting Irrelevant Evidence.8个月大的婴儿通过降低无关证据的权重进行元学习。
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Jun 1;7:141-155. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00079. eCollection 2023.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Jun;29(3):766-799. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02017-5. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
4
Towards a rational constructivist theory of cognitive development.迈向一种理性建构主义的认知发展理论。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Nov;126(6):841-864. doi: 10.1037/rev0000153. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
5
The Language of Programming: A Cognitive Perspective.编程语言的认知视角。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul;23(7):525-528. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 May 29.
6
Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources.资源理性分析:将人类认知理解为对有限计算资源的最佳利用。
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Feb 4;43:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1900061X.
7
Representation of spatial sequences using nested rules in human prefrontal cortex.使用嵌套规则在人类前额叶皮层中表示空间序列。
Neuroimage. 2019 Feb 1;186:245-255. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.061. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
8
Bayesian validation of grammar productions for the language of thought.思维语言语法生成的贝叶斯验证。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 10;13(7):e0200420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200420. eCollection 2018.
9
Learning abstract visual concepts via probabilistic program induction in a Language of Thought.通过思维语言中的概率程序归纳学习抽象视觉概念。
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:320-334. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
10
Mind Games: Game Engines as an Architecture for Intuitive Physics.思维游戏:游戏引擎作为直观物理的架构。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Sep;21(9):649-665. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Jun 24.