University of Toronto, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maastricht University, School of Health Professions Education, Netherlands.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):ajpe7864. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7864.
To determine the discourses on professional identity in pharmacy education over the last century in North America and which one(s) currently dominate. A Foucauldian critical discourse analysis using archival resources from the () and commissioned education reports was used to expose the identity discourses in pharmacy education. This study identified five prominent identity discourses in the pharmacy education literature: apothecary, dispenser, merchandiser, expert advisor, and health care provider. Each discourse constructs the pharmacist's professional identity in different ways and makes possible certain language, subjects, and objects. The health care provider discourse currently dominates the literature. However, an unexpected finding of this study was that the discourses identified did not shift clearly over time, but rather piled up, resulting in students being exposed to incompatible identities. This study illustrates that pharmacist identity constructs are not simple, self-evident, or progressive. In exposing students to incompatible identity discourses, pharmacy education may be unintentionally impacting the formation of a strong, unified healthcare provider identity, which may impact widespread practice change.
为了确定过去一个世纪北美药学教育中的专业身份话语,以及目前占主导地位的话语。本研究采用档案资源(来自美国药学院协会和委托的教育报告),运用福柯式批判话语分析,揭示药学教育中的身份话语。本研究在药学教育文献中确定了五个突出的身份话语:药剂师、药剂师、商人、专家顾问和医疗保健提供者。每一种话语都以不同的方式构建药剂师的专业身份,并使某些语言、主题和对象成为可能。目前,医疗保健提供者话语占据主导地位。然而,本研究的一个意外发现是,随着时间的推移,所确定的话语并没有明显转变,而是堆积起来,导致学生接触到不兼容的身份。这项研究表明,药剂师身份构建并不简单、不言而喻或渐进。通过让学生接触不兼容的身份话语,药学教育可能会无意中影响到强大、统一的医疗保健提供者身份的形成,这可能会影响到广泛的实践变革。