Pick Susannah, Hodsoll John, Stanton Biba, Eskander Amy, Stavropoulos Ioannis, Samra Kiran, Bottini Julia, Ahmad Hena, David Anthony S, Purves Alistair, Nicholson Timothy R
Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Neurology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 6;10(10):e037198. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037198.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used therapeutically for functional (conversion) motor symptoms but there is limited evidence for its efficacy and the optimal protocol. We examined the feasibility of a novel randomised controlled trial (RCT) protocol of TMS to treat functional limb weakness.
A double-blind (patient, outcome assessor) two parallel-arm, controlled RCT.
Specialist neurology and neuropsychiatry services at a large National Health Service Foundation Trust in London, UK.
Patients with a diagnosis of functional limb weakness (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fifth Edition). Exclusion criteria included comorbid neurological or major psychiatric disorder, contraindications to TMS or previous TMS treatment.
Patients were randomised to receive either active (single-pulse TMS to primary motor cortex (M1) above resting motor threshold) or inactive treatment (single-pulse TMS to M1 below resting motor threshold). Both groups received two TMS sessions, 4 weeks apart.
We assessed recruitment, randomisation and retention rates. The primary outcome was patient-rated symptom change (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale, CGI-I). Secondary outcomes included clinician-rated symptom change, psychosocial functioning and disability. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, both TMS visits and at 3-month follow-up.
Twenty-two patients were recruited and 21 (96%) were successfully randomised (active=10; inactive=11). Nineteen (91%) patients were included at follow-up (active=9; inactive=10). Completion rates for most outcomes were good (80%-100%). Most patients were satisfied/very satisfied with the trial in both groups, although ratings were higher in the inactive arm (active=60%, inactive=92%). Adverse events were not more common for the active treatment. Treatment effect sizes for patient-rated CGI-I scores were small-moderate (Cliff's delta=-0.1-0.3, CIs-0.79 to 0.28), reflecting a more positive outcome for the active treatment (67% and 44% of active arm-rated symptoms as 'much improved' at session 2 and follow-up, respectively, vs 20% inactive group). Effect sizes for secondary outcomes were variable.
Our protocol is feasible. The findings suggest that supramotor threshold TMS of M1 is safe, acceptable and potentially beneficial as a treatment for functional limb weakness. A larger RCT is warranted.
ISRCTN51225587.
经颅磁刺激(TMS)已被用于功能性(转换性)运动症状的治疗,但关于其疗效和最佳方案的证据有限。我们研究了一种新型的TMS随机对照试验(RCT)方案治疗功能性肢体无力的可行性。
一项双盲(患者、结果评估者)双平行组对照RCT。
英国伦敦一家大型国民健康服务基金会信托机构的专科神经科和神经精神科服务部门。
诊断为功能性肢体无力的患者(《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版)。排除标准包括合并神经系统疾病或重度精神疾病、TMS的禁忌症或既往TMS治疗史。
患者被随机分配接受主动治疗(对静息运动阈值以上的初级运动皮层(M1)进行单脉冲TMS)或非主动治疗(对静息运动阈值以下的M1进行单脉冲TMS)。两组均接受两次TMS治疗,间隔4周。
我们评估了招募、随机分组和保留率。主要结局是患者评定的症状变化(临床总体印象改善量表,CGI-I)。次要结局包括临床医生评定的症状变化、心理社会功能和残疾情况。在基线、两次TMS治疗访视时以及3个月随访时评估结局。
招募了22名患者,21名(96%)成功随机分组(主动治疗组=10名;非主动治疗组=11名)。19名(91%)患者纳入随访(主动治疗组=9名;非主动治疗组=10名)。大多数结局的完成率良好(80%-100%)。两组中大多数患者对试验感到满意/非常满意,尽管非主动治疗组的评分更高(主动治疗组=60%,非主动治疗组=92%)。主动治疗的不良事件并不更常见。患者评定的CGI-I评分的治疗效应大小为小到中等(克利夫德尔塔=-0.1-0.3,95%置信区间为-0.79至0.28),表明主动治疗取得了更积极的结果(主动治疗组在第2次治疗时和随访时分别有67%和44%的患者评定症状“明显改善”,而非主动治疗组为20%)。次要结局的效应大小各不相同。
我们的方案是可行的。研究结果表明,对M1进行运动阈值以上的TMS作为功能性肢体无力的一种治疗方法是安全、可接受的,并且可能有益。有必要进行更大规模的RCT。
ISRCTN51225587。