Bellapart Judith, Appadurai Vinesh, Lassig-Smith Melissa, Stuart Janine, Zappala Christopher, Boots Rob
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Burns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Crit Care Res Pract. 2020 Sep 23;2020:3951828. doi: 10.1155/2020/3951828. eCollection 2020.
Sleep deprivation is a contributor for delirium in intensive care. Melatonin has been proposed as a pharmacological strategy to improve sleep, but studies have shown that the increase in plasma levels of melatonin do not correlate to a beneficial clinical effect; in addition, melatonin's short half-life may be a major limitation to achieving therapeutic levels. This study applies a previously published novel regimen of melatonin with proven sustained levels of melatonin during a 12 h period. In this study, the aim is to determine if such melatonin dosing positively influences on the sleep architecture and the incidence of delirium in intensive care.
Single center, randomized control trial with consecutive recruitment over 5 years. Medical and surgical patients were in a recovery phase, all weaning from mechanical ventilation. Randomized allocation to placebo or enteral melatonin, using a previously described regimen (loading dose of 3 mg at 21 h, followed by 0.5 mg hourly maintenance dose until 03am through a nasogastric tube). Sleep recordings were performed using polysomnogram at baseline (prior to intervention) and the third night on melatonin (postintervention recording). Delirium was assessed using the Richmond Agitation and the Confusion Assessment Method Scales. Environmental light and noise levels were recorded using a luxmeter and sound meter.
80 patients were screened, but 33 were recruited. Sleep studies showed no statistical differences on arousal index or length of sleep. Baseline delirium scores showed no difference between groups when compared to postintervention scores. RASS scores were 1 in both groups at baseline, compared to zero (drug group) and 0.5 (placebo group) posttreatment. CAM scores were zero (drug group) and 1 (placebo group) at baseline, compared to zero (in both groups) postintervention.
High levels of plasma melatonin during the overnight period of intensive care cohort patients did not improve sleep nor decreased the prevalence of delirium. This trial is registered with Anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12620000661976.aspx.
睡眠剥夺是重症监护中谵妄的一个促成因素。褪黑素已被提议作为一种改善睡眠的药理学策略,但研究表明,血浆褪黑素水平的升高与有益的临床效果并无关联;此外,褪黑素的短半衰期可能是达到治疗水平的一个主要限制因素。本研究应用了一种先前发表的新型褪黑素给药方案,该方案在12小时内可使褪黑素水平持续稳定。在本研究中,目的是确定这种褪黑素给药方案是否对重症监护中的睡眠结构和谵妄发生率产生积极影响。
单中心、随机对照试验,连续招募患者,为期5年。内科和外科患者均处于康复期,均在从机械通气中撤机。采用先前描述的方案(21时给予3毫克负荷剂量,随后通过鼻胃管每小时给予0.5毫克维持剂量直至凌晨3点)将患者随机分配至安慰剂组或肠内褪黑素组。在基线(干预前)和服用褪黑素的第三晚(干预后记录)使用多导睡眠图进行睡眠记录。使用里士满躁动和混乱评估方法量表评估谵妄。使用照度计和声音计记录环境光线和噪音水平。
筛选了80名患者,但招募了33名。睡眠研究显示,在觉醒指数或睡眠时间方面无统计学差异。与干预后评分相比,基线谵妄评分在两组之间无差异。两组基线时的RASS评分为1,治疗后药物组为0,安慰剂组为0.5。两组基线时的CAM评分为药物组0分、安慰剂组1分,干预后两组均为0分。
重症监护队列患者夜间血浆褪黑素水平升高既未改善睡眠,也未降低谵妄患病率。本试验已在Anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12620000661976.aspx注册。