Hoogman Martine, Stolte Marije, Baas Matthijs, Kroesbergen Evelyn
Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9100, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Department of Special Education: Cognitive and Motor Disabilities, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Dec;119:66-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.029. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a debilitating disorder and most research therefore focuses on its deficits and its treatment. Research on the potential positive sides of ADHD is limited, and although a comprehensive overview of empirical studies on this subject is missing, it has been suggested that ADHD is associated with enhanced creativity. To identify important relations, trends and gaps in the literature, we review 31 behavioral studies on creativity and ADHD, distinguishing different research designs, age groups, creativity measurements and effects of psychostimulants, as well as reflecting the potential underlying neural mechanisms of creativity and ADHD. Most studies find evidence for increased divergent thinking for those with high ADHD scores (subclinical) but not for those with the disorder (clinical). The rates of creative abilities/achievements were high among both clinical and subclinical groups. We found no evidence for increased convergent thinking abilities in ADHD, nor did we find an overall negative effect of psychostimulants on creativity. Neuroscientific findings suggest candidate regions as well as mechanisms that should be studied further to increase our understanding of the relationship between creativity and ADHD. We propose research opportunities to boost the knowledge needed to better understand the potential positive side of ADHD.
注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是一种使人衰弱的疾病,因此大多数研究都集中在其缺陷及治疗方面。关于ADHD潜在积极面的研究有限,尽管目前缺少对该主题实证研究的全面综述,但有人提出ADHD与创造力增强有关。为了确定文献中的重要关系、趋势和差距,我们回顾了31项关于创造力和ADHD的行为研究,区分了不同的研究设计、年龄组、创造力测量方法以及精神兴奋剂的影响,同时也思考了创造力和ADHD潜在的神经机制。大多数研究发现,ADHD高分者(亚临床)存在发散性思维增强的证据,但ADHD患者(临床)则不然。临床组和亚临床组的创造力能力/成就发生率都很高。我们没有发现ADHD患者聚合性思维能力增强的证据,也没有发现精神兴奋剂对创造力有总体负面影响。神经科学研究结果表明,需要进一步研究一些候选区域和机制,以加深我们对创造力与ADHD之间关系的理解。我们提出了一些研究机会,以增加更好理解ADHD潜在积极面所需的知识。