Watzke H, Schwarz H P, Luger A, Stummvoll H K
Acta Med Austriaca. 1987;14(1):21-4.
To evaluate usefulness of Limulus amoebocyte lysate test and blood culture in the diagnosis of septicemia both tests were performed in 27 intensive care patients. Test results were compared with a clinical sepsis score. Ten (62%) out of 16 patients with clinical diagnosis of septicemia showed a positive endotoxin test and 11 (69%) a positive blood culture. In 14 patients (87%) either endotoxin test or blood culture revealed a positive result. Two out of 11 patients (20%) classified by the sepsis score as non-septic showed positive blood cultures as well as positive endotoxin tests. 4 patients with gram-positive bacteria in the blood cultures showed a positive endotoxin test. Due to lack of sensitivity and specificity the Limulus amoebocyte lysate test is of rather low value in the diagnosis of septicemia. Simultaneous performance of Limulus amoebocyte lysate test and blood culture is able to improve the sensitivity, which then over-rules the one obtained when only blood cultures are performed.
为评估鲎试剂检测和血培养在败血症诊断中的作用,对27例重症监护患者进行了这两项检测。将检测结果与临床败血症评分进行比较。临床诊断为败血症的16例患者中,10例(62%)鲎试剂检测呈阳性,11例(69%)血培养呈阳性。14例患者(87%)鲎试剂检测或血培养结果呈阳性。败血症评分归类为非败血症的11例患者中有2例(20%)血培养和鲎试剂检测均呈阳性。血培养中有革兰氏阳性菌的4例患者鲎试剂检测呈阳性。由于缺乏敏感性和特异性,鲎试剂检测在败血症诊断中的价值较低。同时进行鲎试剂检测和血培养能够提高敏感性,这比仅进行血培养时的敏感性更高。