Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK.
Addiction. 2021 May;116(5):1021-1033. doi: 10.1111/add.15294. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
The global growth of mobile phone use has led to new opportunities for health interventions, including through text messaging. We aimed to estimate the effects of text messaging interventions on alcohol consumption among risky drinkers.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of reports on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English. Searches were conducted on 23 May 2019 in PubMed; PubMed Central; CENTRAL; CDSR; DARE; NHS-EED; Scopus; PsycINFO; PsycARTICLES; CINAHL; and Web of Science. Measurements included number of episodes of heavy drinking (HED) per month and weekly alcohol consumption (WAC) in grams. Trials among risky drinkers who were not receiving co-interventions were included in the review (n = 3481, mean age 29 years, 41% female). Data were extracted from reports and authors were contacted for additional data.
Ten trials were included and all analyses were based on random-effects models. Primary analyses, including seven trials (n = 2528) for HED and five trials (n = 2236) for WAC, found that the interventions may reduce self-reported HED [-0.33 episodes per month; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.79, 0.12] and WAC (-18.62 g per week; 95% CI = -39.61, 2.38), although both estimates included the null. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) quality of evidence was judged to be low for both HED and WAC, primarily due to risk of attrition and performance bias, heterogeneity and influence of pilot trials on estimates.
Text messaging alcohol interventions may reduce alcohol consumption compared with no or basic health information; however, there are doubts about the overall quality of the evidence.
移动电话使用的全球增长为健康干预措施提供了新的机会,包括通过短信。我们旨在评估短信干预对高危饮酒者饮酒量的影响。
对 2019 年 5 月 23 日发表的英文随机对照试验报告进行系统评价和荟萃分析。在 PubMed、PubMed Central、CENTRAL、CDSR、DARE、NHS-EED、Scopus、PsycINFO、PsycARTICLES、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 上进行了搜索。测量包括每月重度饮酒(HED)发作次数和每周酒精摄入量(WAC)。包括未接受共同干预的高危饮酒者在内的试验被纳入综述(n=3481,平均年龄 29 岁,41%为女性)。从报告中提取数据,并联系作者以获取其他数据。
纳入了 10 项试验,所有分析均基于随机效应模型。主要分析包括 7 项针对 HED 的试验(n=2528)和 5 项针对 WAC 的试验(n=2236),发现干预措施可能减少自我报告的 HED [-0.33 次/月;95%置信区间(CI)= -0.79,0.12]和 WAC(-18.62g/周;95%CI=-39.61,2.38),尽管这两个估计值均包含零值。HED 和 WAC 的推荐分级评估、制定与评价(GRADE)证据质量被判定为低,主要原因是失访和实施偏倚、异质性以及试点试验对估计值的影响。
与无信息或基本健康信息相比,短信干预可能会减少饮酒量;然而,对证据总体质量存在疑问。