Suppr超能文献

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,院前给予纳洛酮后的拒绝。

Refusals After Prehospital Administration of Naloxone during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Jan-Feb;25(1):46-54. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1834656. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if COVID-19 was associated with a change in patient refusals after Emergency Medical Services (EMS) administration of naloxone.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study in which the incidence of refusals after naloxone administration in a single EMS system was evaluated. The number of refusals after naloxone administration was compared across the before-pandemic interval (01/01/20 to 02/15/20) and the during-pandemic interval (03/16/20 to 04/30/20). For comparison the incidence of all other patient refusals before and during COVID-19 as well as the incidences of naloxone administration before and during COVID-19 were also reported.

RESULTS

Prior to the widespread knowledge of the COVID-19 pandemic, 24 of 164 (14.6%) patients who received naloxone via EMS refused transport. During the pandemic, 55 of 153 (35.9%) patients who received naloxone via EMS refused transport. Subjects receiving naloxone during the COVID-19 pandemic were at greater risk of refusal of transport than those receiving naloxone prior to the pandemic (RR = 2.45; 95% CI 1.6-3.76). Among those who did not receive naloxone, 2067 of 6956 (29.7%) patients were not transported prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and 2483 of 6016 (41.3%) were not transported during the pandemic. Subjects who did not receive naloxone with EMS were at greater risk of refusal of transport during the COVID-19 pandemic than prior to it (RR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.32-1.46).

CONCLUSION

In this single EMS system, more than a two-fold increase in the rate of refusal after non-fatal opioid overdose was observed following the COVID-19 outbreak.

摘要

目的

确定 COVID-19 是否与急救医疗服务(EMS)给予纳洛酮后患者拒绝接受治疗有关。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,评估了单一 EMS 系统中纳洛酮给药后拒绝治疗的发生率。比较了大流行前间隔(01/01/20 至 02/15/20)和大流行期间间隔(03/16/20 至 04/30/20)期间纳洛酮给药后拒绝治疗的人数。为了进行比较,还报告了 COVID-19 之前和期间所有其他患者拒绝治疗的发生率,以及 COVID-19 之前和期间纳洛酮给药的发生率。

结果

在广泛了解 COVID-19 大流行之前,通过 EMS 接受纳洛酮的 164 名患者中有 24 名(14.6%)拒绝转运。在大流行期间,通过 EMS 接受纳洛酮的 153 名患者中有 55 名(35.9%)拒绝转运。与大流行前接受纳洛酮的患者相比,在 COVID-19 大流行期间接受纳洛酮的患者拒绝转运的风险更高(RR=2.45;95%CI 1.6-3.76)。在未接受纳洛酮的患者中,在 COVID-19 大流行前有 6956 名患者中的 2067 名(29.7%)未接受转运,而在大流行期间有 6016 名患者中的 2483 名(41.3%)未接受转运。与大流行前相比,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,未通过 EMS 接受纳洛酮的患者拒绝转运的风险更高(RR=1.39;95%CI 1.32-1.46)。

结论

在这个单一的 EMS 系统中,在 COVID-19 爆发后,非致命性阿片类药物过量后拒绝治疗的发生率增加了两倍多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验