• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人生活质量-7 维度量表(OQoL-7)的有效性。

Validity of the older people quality of life-7 domains (OQoL-7) scale.

机构信息

Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Route de la Corniche 10, 1010, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Service of Geriatric Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, University of Lausanne Hospital Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 14;18(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01589-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-020-01589-5
PMID:33054841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7557060/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Older people Quality of Life-7 domains (OQoL-7) is a 28-item multidimensional questionnaire developed to measure community-dwelling older people's QoL. The OQoL-7 assesses both importance of and satisfaction in seven QoL domains (Material resources; Close entourage; Social and cultural life; Esteem and recognition; Health and mobility; Feeling of safety; and Autonomy). This study aimed to investigate concurrent and construct validity of the OQoL-7. A secondary aim was to compare different methods of weighting participants' ratings of satisfaction according to their individual ratings of importance, as compared to the OQoL-7 total score (unweighted).

METHODS

Data came from the first and second samples of the Lausanne cohort 65+ study, assessed at the same age of 72-77 years in 2011 (N = 1117) and 2016 (N = 1091), respectively. To assess concurrent validity, the OQoL-7 was compared to other measures of the same concept (single QoL item) or related concepts (self-rated health, SF-12). Construct validity was tested by comparing subscores in the seven QoL domains in the presence and absence of two stressful events during the preceding year (financial difficulties and relationship difficulties). The effect of importance weighting was assessed using moderated regression analysis.

RESULTS

The OQoL-7 total score was significantly associated with the single QoL item (Spearman's rho 0.46), self-rated health (Spearman's rho 0.34), SF-12 physical (Spearman's rho 0.22) and mental (Spearman's rho 0.28) component scores. Large differences (Cohen's d > 0.8) were observed in the presence or absence of stressful events in the expected QoL domains: "Material resources" in the presence or absence of "Financial difficulties" (Cohen's d 1.34), and "Close entourage" in the presence or absence of "Relationship difficulties" (Cohen's d 0.84). Importance weighting resulted in a very small improvement in the prediction of the single QoL item (ΔR 0.018). All results were highly consistent across 2011 and 2016 samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The OQoL-7 showed adequate concurrent and construct validity in two samples of older people. In future studies, the decision to use weighted or unweighted scores will depend on the priority given to either optimizing the prediction of QoL or limiting the burden on respondents and the amount of missing data.

摘要

背景

老年人生活质量-7 领域量表(OQoL-7)是一种 28 项多维问卷,旨在测量社区居住的老年人的生活质量。OQoL-7 评估了七个生活质量领域(物质资源;亲密伙伴;社会文化生活;尊重和认可;健康和活动能力;安全感;和自主)的重要性和满意度。本研究旨在调查 OQoL-7 的同时效度和结构效度。次要目的是比较根据个人对重要性的评价对参与者满意度评分进行加权的不同方法,与 OQoL-7 总分(未加权)相比。

方法

数据来自洛桑队列 65+研究的第一和第二样本,分别于 2011 年(N=1117)和 2016 年(N=1091)在 72-77 岁时进行评估。为了评估同时效度,将 OQoL-7 与同一概念(单一生活质量项目)或相关概念(自我评估健康、SF-12)的其他测量方法进行了比较。通过比较前一年存在和不存在两个压力事件(经济困难和关系困难)时七个生活质量领域的子分数来检验结构效度。使用 moderated regression analysis 评估重要性加权的效果。

结果

OQoL-7 总分与单一生活质量项目(Spearman's rho 0.46)、自我评估健康(Spearman's rho 0.34)、SF-12 身体(Spearman's rho 0.22)和心理(Spearman's rho 0.28)分量表显著相关。在存在或不存在压力事件的情况下,预计会在生活质量领域中出现较大差异(Cohen's d > 0.8):“物质资源”在存在或不存在“财务困难”的情况下(Cohen's d 1.34),以及“亲密伙伴”在存在或不存在“关系困难”的情况下(Cohen's d 0.84)。重要性加权仅略微改善了对单一生活质量项目的预测(ΔR 0.018)。所有结果在 2011 年和 2016 年样本中均高度一致。

结论

OQoL-7 在两个老年人样本中表现出足够的同时效度和结构效度。在未来的研究中,使用加权或未加权评分的决定将取决于对优化生活质量预测或限制受访者负担和缺失数据量的重视程度。

相似文献

1
Validity of the older people quality of life-7 domains (OQoL-7) scale.老年人生活质量-7 维度量表(OQoL-7)的有效性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 14;18(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01589-5.
2
Domains of importance to the quality of life of older people from two Swiss regions.对瑞士两个地区老年人生活质量重要的领域。
Age Ageing. 2015 Nov;44(6):979-85. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv130. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
3
Change in quality of life among community-dwelling older adults: population-based longitudinal study.社区居住的老年人生活质量变化:基于人群的纵向研究。
Qual Life Res. 2019 May;28(5):1305-1314. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02108-w. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
4
Intervals between response choices on a single-item measure of quality of life.单项生活质量测量中各反应选项之间的间隔。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Mar 11;14:41. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0443-5.
5
Validity and reliability of the modified Chinese version of the Older People's Quality of Life Questionnaire (OPQOL) in older people living alone in China.在中国独居老年人中使用改良后的中文版老年人生活质量问卷(OPQOL)的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2014 Dec;9(4):306-16. doi: 10.1111/opn.12042. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
6
Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK).卒中特异性生活质量量表(SS-QOL)的验证:丹麦语版本(SS-QOL-DK)的信效度检验
Clin Rehabil. 2007 Jul;21(7):620-7. doi: 10.1177/0269215507075504.
7
Construct validity of the items on the Stroke Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) questionnaire that evaluate the participation component of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.评估《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》参与部分的卒中特异性生活质量(SS-QOL)问卷项目的结构效度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jan;40(2):225-231. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1250117. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
8
Association between Physical Frailty and Quality of Life in a Representative Sample of Community-Dwelling Swiss Older People.瑞士社区居住老年人代表性样本中身体虚弱与生活质量的关联
J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(5):585-592. doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0772-4.
9
Quality of life profile in three cohorts of community-dwelling Swiss older people.瑞士社区居住的三组老年人的生活质量概况。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1112-4.
10
Temporal changes in importance of quality of life domains: a longitudinal study in community-dwelling Swiss older people.生活质量领域重要性的时间变化:一项对瑞士社区居住的老年人的纵向研究。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Feb;28(2):421-428. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1983-4. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
A COSMIN systematic review of generic patient-reported outcome measures in Switzerland.一项关于瑞士通用患者报告结局指标的COSMIN系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03942-x.
2
The Indian Geriatrics Quality of Life Inventory Scale (IGQOLI): Development and Validation of a Scale to Evaluate the Quality of Life among Geriatric Population of India.印度老年生活质量量表(IGQOLI):一种评估印度老年人群生活质量的量表的开发与验证
J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Aug 31;14(2):80-87. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2024.14.2.80.
3
Cohort Profile: The Lausanne cohort 65+ (Lc65+).

本文引用的文献

1
Health-related quality of life in Switzerland: normative data for the SF-36v2 questionnaire.瑞士的健康相关生活质量:SF-36v2 问卷的规范数据。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jul;28(7):1963-1977. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02161-5. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
2
Change in quality of life among community-dwelling older adults: population-based longitudinal study.社区居住的老年人生活质量变化:基于人群的纵向研究。
Qual Life Res. 2019 May;28(5):1305-1314. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02108-w. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
3
The suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for Canadian and Norwegian older adults.
队列简介:洛桑65岁及以上队列(Lc65+)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Aug 10;51(4):e156-e166. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab245.
世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL - BREF)对加拿大和挪威老年人的适用性。
Eur J Ageing. 2008 Feb 13;5(1):77. doi: 10.1007/s10433-008-0070-z. eCollection 2008 Mar.
4
Measurement properties and normative data for the Norwegian SF-36: results from a general population survey.挪威SF-36量表的测量属性及规范数据:一项普通人群调查的结果
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Mar 14;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0625-9.
5
Domains of importance to the quality of life of older people from two Swiss regions.对瑞士两个地区老年人生活质量重要的领域。
Age Ageing. 2015 Nov;44(6):979-85. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv130. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
6
The often overlooked issue of statistical power: this and other issues regarding assessing importance weighting in quality of life measures.
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Mar;50:303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
7
Adult measures of general health and health-related quality of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) and Short Form 12-Item (SF-12) Health Surveys, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6D (SF-6D), Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL).成人总体健康及健康相关生活质量的测量指标:医学结局研究简明健康调查问卷36项版(SF - 36)、简明健康调查问卷12项版(SF - 12)、诺丁汉健康量表(NHP)、疾病影响量表(SIP)、医学结局研究简明健康调查问卷6维度版(SF - 6D)、健康效用指数第3版(HUI3)、幸福感量表(QWB)以及生活质量评估量表(AQoL)。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S383-412. doi: 10.1002/acr.20541.
8
Regression estimators for generic health-related quality of life and quality-adjusted life years.用于一般健康相关生活质量和质量调整生命年的回归估计器。
Med Decis Making. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):56-69. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11416988. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
9
The Psychometric Properties of the Older People's Quality of Life Questionnaire, Compared with the CASP-19 and the WHOQOL-OLD.老年人生活质量问卷的心理测量特性,与CASP - 19及世界卫生组织老年生活质量量表的比较
Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2009;2009:298950. doi: 10.1155/2009/298950. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
10
What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model.自评健康及其预测死亡率的原因是什么?走向统一的概念模型。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Aug;69(3):307-16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.013. Epub 2009 Jun 10.