• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有意义的伙伴关系:家庭医学住院诊所患者及家属咨询委员会的发展阶段

Meaningful Partnerships: Stages of Development of a Patient and Family Advisory Council at a Family Medicine Residency Clinic.

作者信息

Schlaudecker Jeffrey D, Goodnow Keesha, Goroncy Anna, Hartmann Reid, Regan Saundra, Rich Megan, Butler Adam, White Christopher

机构信息

Research Division, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

The Christ Hospital/University of Cincinnati Family Medicine Residency Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

出版信息

J Particip Med. 2019 Mar 20;11(1):e12105. doi: 10.2196/12105.

DOI:10.2196/12105
PMID:33055073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7434079/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Partnering with patients and families is a crucial step in optimizing health. A patient and family advisory council (PFAC) is a group of patients and family members working together collaboratively with providers and staff to improve health care.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the creation of a PFAC within a family medicine residency clinic. To understand the successful development of a PFAC, challenges, potential barriers, and positive outcomes of a meaningful partnership will be reported.

METHODS

The stages of PFAC development include leadership team formation and initial training, PFAC member recruitment, and meeting launch. Following a description of each stage, outcomes are outlined and lessons learned are discussed. PFAC members completed an open-ended survey and participated in a focus group interview at the completion of the first year. Interviewees provided feedback regarding (1) favorite aspects or experiences, (2) PFAC impact on a family medicine clinic, and (3) future projects to improve care. Common themes will be presented.

RESULTS

The composition of the PFAC consisted of 18 advisors, including 8 patient and family advisors, 4 staff advisors, 4 resident physician advisors, and 2 faculty physician advisors. The average meeting attendance was 12 members over 11 meetings in the span of the first year. A total of 13 out of 13 (100%) surveyed participants were satisfied with their experience serving on the PFAC.

CONCLUSIONS

PFACs provide a platform for patient engagement and an opportunity to drive home key concepts around collaboration within a residency training program. A framework for the creation of a PFAC, along with lessons learned, can be utilized to advise other residency programs in developing and evaluating meaningful PFACs.

摘要

背景

与患者及其家属合作是优化健康状况的关键一步。患者及家属咨询委员会(PFAC)是由患者和家属组成的团体,他们与医疗服务提供者和工作人员共同协作,以改善医疗保健。

目的

本研究旨在描述在一家家庭医学住院医师诊所内创建PFAC的过程。为了解PFAC的成功发展情况,将报告其面临的挑战、潜在障碍以及有意义的合作所带来的积极成果。

方法

PFAC的发展阶段包括领导团队组建和初始培训、PFAC成员招募以及会议启动。在描述每个阶段之后,概述成果并讨论经验教训。PFAC成员在第一年结束时完成了一项开放式调查,并参加了焦点小组访谈。受访者就以下方面提供了反馈:(1)最喜欢的方面或经历;(2)PFAC对家庭医学诊所的影响;(3)改善护理的未来项目。将呈现共同主题。

结果

PFAC的组成包括18名顾问,其中有8名患者及家属顾问、4名工作人员顾问、4名住院医师顾问和2名教员医师顾问。在第一年期间,11次会议的平均参会人数为12人。在接受调查的13名参与者中,有13人(100%)对其在PFAC的服务经历感到满意。

结论

PFAC为患者参与提供了一个平台,并有机会在住院医师培训项目中深入探讨合作的关键概念。创建PFAC的框架以及经验教训可用于为其他住院医师项目提供建议,以开发和评估有意义的PFAC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2334/7434079/c6e098c76065/jopm_v11i1e12105_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2334/7434079/51c834757597/jopm_v11i1e12105_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2334/7434079/2f4178d8531e/jopm_v11i1e12105_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2334/7434079/c6e098c76065/jopm_v11i1e12105_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2334/7434079/51c834757597/jopm_v11i1e12105_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2334/7434079/2f4178d8531e/jopm_v11i1e12105_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2334/7434079/c6e098c76065/jopm_v11i1e12105_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Meaningful Partnerships: Stages of Development of a Patient and Family Advisory Council at a Family Medicine Residency Clinic.有意义的伙伴关系:家庭医学住院诊所患者及家属咨询委员会的发展阶段
J Particip Med. 2019 Mar 20;11(1):e12105. doi: 10.2196/12105.
2
Patient and Family Advisory Councils (PFACs): Identifying Challenges and Solutions to Support Engagement in Research.患者和家属咨询委员会(PFACs):确定支持参与研究的挑战和解决方案。
Patient. 2018 Aug;11(4):413-423. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0298-4.
3
The Virtual Patient and Family Advisory Council in the COVID-19 Era.新冠疫情时期的虚拟患者和家庭顾问委员会。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Feb;34(Suppl):S37-S39. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.S1.200449.
4
Patient, Family, and Community Advisory Councils in Health Care and Research: a Systematic Review.患者、家庭和社区咨询委员会在医疗保健和研究中的作用:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul;34(7):1292-1303. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4565-9. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
5
Navigating meaningful engagement: lessons from partnering with youth and families in brain-based disability research.探索有意义的参与:在基于大脑的残疾研究中与青年和家庭合作的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 5;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00543-9.
6
Who represents me? A patient-derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs).谁代表我?通过患者和家庭咨询委员会(PFAC)实现患者参与的患者衍生模型。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):148-158. doi: 10.1111/hex.12983. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
7
Development and evaluation of a parent advisory group to inform a research program for knowledge translation in child health.组建并评估一个家长咨询小组,以为儿童健康知识转化研究项目提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 7;7(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00280-3.
8
Engaging Patients, Health Care Professionals, and Community Members to Improve Preoperative Decision Making for Older Adults Facing High-Risk Surgery.让患者、医护人员和社区成员参与进来,以改善面临高风险手术的老年人的术前决策。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Oct 1;151(10):938-945. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1308.
9
Leveraging an Ambulatory Patient and Family Advisory Council to Improve Patient Experience Scores.利用门诊患者及家属咨询委员会提高患者体验评分。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Aug 30;8:23743735211039316. doi: 10.1177/23743735211039316. eCollection 2021.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation of the Content of a Behavioural Text Message Delivered Weight Management Intervention for a Socio-Culturally and Geographically Diverse Population of Postpartum Women in the UK: The Supporting MumS (SMS) Intervention.针对英国社会文化和地理背景各异的产后女性群体,对行为短信传递式体重管理干预内容进行调整:“支持妈妈们”(SMS)干预措施
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70368. doi: 10.1111/hex.70368.
2
Promoting Patient Safety Through Patient Engagement at the Organisational Level: A Delphi-Based Needs Assessment Among Patient and Family Advisory Councils.通过组织层面的患者参与促进患者安全:患者及家属咨询委员会基于德尔菲法的需求评估
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70319. doi: 10.1111/hex.70319.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Patient and Citizen Innovation Council in family practice.家庭医疗中的患者与公民创新委员会。
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Feb;63(2):e102-e106.
2
"How Can We Talk about Patient-centered Care without Patients at the Table?" Lessons Learned from Patient Advisory Councils.“没有患者参与,我们如何谈论以患者为中心的医疗?” 从患者咨询委员会获得的经验教训。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Nov 12;29(6):775-784. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.06.150380.
3
Early Experiences Engaging Patients Through Patient and Family Advisory Councils.通过患者及家属咨询委员会让患者参与其中的早期经验。
Recruitment of patients, carers and members of the public to advisory boards, groups and panels in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review.
招募患者、护理人员和公众成员加入公共和患者参与的健康研究中的咨询委员会、小组和专题小组:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 13;13(10):e072918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072918.
4
A Description of Personal Health Information Management Work With a Spotlight on the Practices of Older Adults: Qualitative e-Delphi Study With Professional Organizers.个人健康信息管理工作描述——以老年人群体的实践为重点:与专业组织者合作的定性电子德尔菲研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 31;25:e42330. doi: 10.2196/42330.
5
Exploring how patients, carers and members of the public are recruited to advisory boards, groups and panels as partners in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review protocol.探索如何招募患者、护理人员和公众成员作为公众和患者参与的健康研究的合作伙伴,参与顾问委员会、团体和小组:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 21;12(4):e059048. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059048.
6
Bridging the Patient Engagement Gap in Research and Quality Improvement Utilizing the Henry Ford Flexible Engagement Model.利用亨利·福特灵活参与模式弥合研究与质量改进中的患者参与差距。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2022 Jan 17;9(1):35-45. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1828. eCollection 2022 Winter.
7
Engaging Youth in the Bipolar Youth Action Project: Community-Based Participatory Research.让青少年参与双相情感障碍青少年行动项目:基于社区的参与式研究。
J Particip Med. 2020 Sep 10;12(3):e19475. doi: 10.2196/19475.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2016 Oct-Dec;39(4):316-24. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000150.
4
Building blocks for successful patient and family advisory boards: collaboration, communication, and commitment.成功的患者及家属咨询委员会的基石:合作、沟通与承诺。
Nurs Adm Q. 2013 Jul-Sep;37(3):247-53. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0b013e318295ed58.
5
Patient-centered care and adherence: definitions and applications to improve outcomes.以患者为中心的护理与依从性:改善结局的定义及应用
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008 Dec;20(12):600-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00360.x.