Suppr超能文献

探索如何招募患者、护理人员和公众成员作为公众和患者参与的健康研究的合作伙伴,参与顾问委员会、团体和小组:范围综述方案。

Exploring how patients, carers and members of the public are recruited to advisory boards, groups and panels as partners in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Public and Patient Involvement Research Unit, School of Medicine and Health Research Institute (HRI), University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 21;12(4):e059048. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059048.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Engaging patients, carers and members of the public in health research has become widely recognised as an important approach for bridging the gap between research, and health and social care by increasing the relevance of research for those who benefit from its findings. Specific approaches to engagement vary, but commonly include advisory boards, groups or patient panels that are active throughout all stages of research. The breadth of and optimal strategies for recruiting patients, carers and members of the public to such boards, groups or panels remains unclear. The objective of this manuscript is to identify the breadth of and optimal strategies used to recruit patients, carers and members of the public to advisory boards, groups or panels, within public and patient involvement (PPI) research.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This review follows the scoping review framework by Peters , an elaboration on the framework by Arksey and O'Malley. The search strategy was co-developed among the research team, PPI research experts and a faculty librarian. The review will take place between July 2021 and June 2022. In July and August 2021, eight electronic databases, MEDLINE (PubMed), MEDLINE (OVID), Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, will be explored to capture all available literature. Two independent reviewers will screen articles by title and abstract and then at full text based on predetermined criteria. The data will be presented in a tabular format with a narrative summary discussing how the research findings relate to the overarching research question. A thematic analysis will also be completed using qualitative description, identifying key themes and gaps in the literature.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics is not required for this review. We aim to disseminate the information gathered through presentations at academic conferences, peer-reviewed publications and consultations with lay audiences.

摘要

简介

让患者、护理人员和公众参与健康研究已被广泛认为是缩小研究与健康和社会护理之间差距的重要方法,通过提高研究对受益于研究结果的人的相关性。参与的具体方法各不相同,但通常包括咨询委员会、小组或患者小组,这些委员会、小组或小组在研究的所有阶段都很活跃。将患者、护理人员和公众招募到这些委员会、小组或小组中的广度和最佳策略仍不清楚。本文的目的是确定将患者、护理人员和公众招募到咨询委员会、小组或小组中的广度和最佳策略,这些委员会、小组或小组是在公众和患者参与(PPI)研究中进行的。

方法和分析

本综述遵循 Peters 的范围综述框架,对 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的框架进行了阐述。该搜索策略是由研究团队、PPI 研究专家和一名学院图书馆员共同制定的。审查将于 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 6 月进行。在 2021 年 7 月和 8 月,将探索八个电子数据库,即 MEDLINE(PubMed)、MEDLINE(OVID)、Embase、CINAHL、PsychINFO、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library,以捕获所有可用的文献。两名独立审查员将根据预定标准通过标题和摘要筛选文章,然后在全文筛选。数据将以表格形式呈现,并附有叙述性摘要,讨论研究结果与总体研究问题的关系。还将使用定性描述完成主题分析,确定文献中的关键主题和差距。

伦理和传播

本综述不需要伦理。我们旨在通过学术会议、同行评议出版物和与非专业听众的咨询来传播收集到的信息。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research.利益相关者参与健康研究实用指南
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Mar;34(3):458-463. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4738-6. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
10
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.范围研究:方法学的推进。
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验