Suppr超能文献

得一分有两步:在进攻型团队运动中创造和转化机会。

Two steps for scoring a point: Creating and converting opportunities in invasion team sports.

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Education, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.

Department of Statistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240419. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

In invasion team sports, scoring efficiency depends on the ability to create scoring opportunities and to convert them into goals or points. Scoring performance varies across sports and comparisons among them are little. In this paper we compare creation and conversion of scoring opportunities in different team sports and genders. Box-score data from six sports [basketball, handball, water polo, field hockey, football, ice hockey] (328 teams, 5723 games, both genders) were standardized by "per ball possession". We applied Bayesian methods to compute the posterior distributions of shots per possession (SHTpPOS), points per shot (PTSpSHT) and points per possession (PTSpPOS). We evaluated differences for these three variables among sports, between genders and the correlation between every pair of them. Inter-sports evaluation evidenced basketball, handball, ice hockey and water polo are sports with a high probability of creating shots (SHTpPOS-p(robability) > 0.65). Complementary, ice hockey, field hockey and football are sports with a low probability of converting shots (PTSpSHT-0.05 < p < 0.26). Despite the distinct results among sports for creating and converting opportunities, all sports in both genders, converged to a scoring efficiency (PTSpPOS) below 0.5. In the genders' comparison, men are more efficient in creating opportunities than women, except in water polo. For scoring efficiency, differences between men and women are fewer. Results prevent generalization about differences in scoring efficiency between genders. Finally, creation and conversion have low correlation in sports with high shot creation probabilities (basketball and ice hockey). In these sports, scoring is not limited by the number of shots taken but rather by their accuracy. For sports with low shot creation probabilities (soccer and men field hockey), creation and conversion presented higher correlation. Evidences contribute to increase coaches' understanding about scoring tactics' challenges in team sports and design practices accordingly.

摘要

在侵袭性团队运动中,得分效率取决于创造得分机会的能力以及将这些机会转化为进球或得分的能力。不同运动项目的得分表现存在差异,而且相互之间的比较很少。本文比较了不同团队运动项目和性别之间创造和转化得分机会的能力。我们对来自六种运动项目[篮球、手球、水球、曲棍球、足球、冰球](328 支球队,5723 场比赛,男女混合)的比赛数据进行了“每球控球权”的标准化处理。我们应用贝叶斯方法计算了每控球权的射门次数(SHTpPOS)、每射门得分(PTSpSHT)和每控球权得分(PTSpPOS)的后验分布。我们评估了这些变量在运动项目之间、性别之间的差异,以及它们之间的相关性。不同运动项目的评估结果表明,篮球、手球、冰球和水球是创造射门机会概率较高的运动项目(SHTpPOS-p(概率)>0.65)。互补地,冰球、曲棍球和足球是创造射门机会概率较低的运动项目(PTSpSHT-0.05<p<0.26)。尽管在创造和转化机会方面不同运动项目之间存在明显的差异,但在男女混合项目中,所有运动项目的得分效率(PTSpPOS)都低于 0.5。在性别比较中,男性在创造机会方面比女性更有效率,除了在水球项目中。对于得分效率,男性和女性之间的差异较少。结果表明,不能将男女之间的得分效率差异推广到所有运动项目中。最后,在具有高射门创造概率的运动项目(篮球和冰球)中,创造和转化之间的相关性较低。在这些运动项目中,得分不仅受射门次数的限制,还受射门准确性的限制。在具有低射门创造概率的运动项目(足球和男子曲棍球)中,创造和转化之间的相关性更高。这些证据有助于提高教练对团队运动中得分策略挑战的理解,并相应地设计实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd1/7561162/db90f8958075/pone.0240419.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验