• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Penalties for Lockdown Violations During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany.德国新冠疫情期间违反封锁规定的处罚效果
Am J Public Health. 2020 Dec;110(12):1844-1849. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305903. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
2
Did border closures slow SARS-CoV-2?边境关闭是否减缓了 SARS-CoV-2 的传播?
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 1;12(1):1709. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05482-7.
3
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
4
Impact of the stringency of lockdown measures on covid-19: A theoretical model of a pandemic.封锁措施的严格程度对新冠疫情的影响:一种大流行的理论模型。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 5;16(10):e0258205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258205. eCollection 2021.
5
Lockdown-type containment measures for COVID-19 prevention and control: a descriptive ecological study with data from South Africa, Germany, Brazil, Spain, United States, Italy and New Zealand, February - August 2020.新冠疫情防控的封城式隔离措施:2020 年 2 月至 8 月,南非、德国、巴西、西班牙、美国、意大利和新西兰相关数据的描述性生态学研究
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2021 Jan 11;30(1):e2020513. doi: 10.1590/S1679-49742021000100025. eCollection 2021.
6
Time to < 1 for COVID-19 public health lockdown measures.对 COVID-19 公共卫生封锁措施的时间<1。
Epidemiol Infect. 2020 Dec 9;148:e301. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820002964.
7
Effect of lockdown and vaccination on the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.封锁和疫苗接种对德国 COVID-19 大流行进程的影响。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Mar;60(3):125-135. doi: 10.5414/CP204191.
8
Exposure to Spoken Communication in Children With Cochlear Implants During the COVID-19 Lockdown.COVID-19 封锁期间植入人工耳蜗儿童的口语交流接触。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Apr 1;147(4):368-376. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.5496.
9
Estimation of R0 for the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Germany from excess mortality.从超额死亡率估计 SARS-CoV-2 在德国的传播 R0。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 14;12(1):17221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22101-7.
10
Association of lockdowns with the protective role of ultraviolet-B (UVB) radiation in reducing COVID-19 deaths.锁定与紫外线 B(UVB)辐射在减少 COVID-19 死亡中的保护作用之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 24;11(1):22851. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01908-w.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Government Lockdowns on the Mental Health of the General Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.政府封锁措施对普通民众心理健康的影响:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 Apr 30;17(4):e83249. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83249. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Examination of the requirements for powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) utilization as an alternative to lockdown.对使用动力空气净化呼吸器(PAPR)作为封锁替代方案的要求进行审查。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):1217. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82348-0.
3
Systematic review of empiric studies on lockdowns, workplace closures, and other non-pharmaceutical interventions in non-healthcare workplaces during the initial year of the COVID-19 pandemic: benefits and selected unintended consequences.COVID-19 大流行初始阶段非医疗工作场所实施封锁、关闭工作场所和其他非药物干预措施的经验性研究的系统评价:效益和一些意外的后果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):884. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18377-1.
4
When the antidote is the poison: Investigating the relationship between people's social media usage and loneliness when face-to-face communication is restricted.当解药成为毒药:探究在面对面交流受到限制时,人们使用社交媒体与孤独感之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 9;19(2):e0296423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296423. eCollection 2024.
5
Seeing the forest and the trees: Holistic view of social distancing on the spread of COVID-19 in China.见树木更见森林:对中国社交距离对新冠病毒传播影响的整体看法
Appl Geogr. 2023 May;154:102941. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102941. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
6
Prosocial rule breaking, ingroups and social norms: Parental decision-making about COVID-19 rule breaking in the UK.亲社会违规行为、内群体与社会规范:英国父母关于违反新冠疫情规定的决策
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 Sep 6. doi: 10.1002/casp.2650.
7
The political cost of sanctions: Evidence from COVID-19.制裁的政治代价:来自 COVID-19 的证据。
Health Policy. 2022 Sep;126(9):872-878. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
8
Problem drinkers and high risk-taking behaviors under the stay-at-home policy of the COVID-19 emergency declaration.在 COVID-19 紧急声明的居家政策下,问题饮酒者和高风险行为。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 13;22(1):1173. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13331-5.
9
Cognitive Factors Associated With Public Acceptance of COVID-19 Nonpharmaceutical Prevention Measures: Cross-sectional Study.与公众对COVID-19非药物预防措施接受度相关的认知因素:横断面研究。
JMIRx Med. 2022 May 13;3(2):e32859. doi: 10.2196/32859. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
10
Impact of physical activity on COVID-19-related symptoms and perception of physical performance, fatigue and exhaustion during stay-at-home orders.居家令期间身体活动对新冠病毒疾病相关症状以及身体表现、疲劳和疲惫感认知的影响。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022 May 3;8(2):e001319. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001319. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive Bias and Public Health Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的认知偏差与公共卫生政策
JAMA. 2020 Jul 28;324(4):337-338. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11623.
2
Association of Stay-at-Home Orders With COVID-19 Hospitalizations in 4 States.4 个州的居家令与 COVID-19 住院病例的关联。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 23;323(24):2522-2524. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.9176.
3
Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review.单独隔离或与其他公共卫生措施相结合以控制新冠病毒病:一项快速综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 8;4(4):CD013574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013574.
4
Interventions to mitigate early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore: a modelling study.干预措施以减轻 SARS-CoV-2 在新加坡的早期传播:一项建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):678-688. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30162-6. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
5
COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic.2019冠状病毒病:迈向大流行的控制
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1015-1018. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30673-5. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
6
Serial interval of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infections.新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)感染的连续间隔。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;93:284-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.060. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
7
Out-of-pocket spending and financial burden among low income adults after Medicaid expansions in the United States: quasi-experimental difference-in-difference study.美国医疗补助扩大后,低收入成年人的自付支出和经济负担:准实验性双重差分研究。
BMJ. 2020 Feb 5;368:m40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m40.
8
Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.新型冠状病毒感染肺炎在中国武汉的早期传播动力学。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1199-1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
9
Impact of Feed the Future initiative on nutrition in children aged less than 5 years in sub-Saharan Africa: difference-in-differences analysis.“未来饲料倡议”对撒哈拉以南非洲 5 岁以下儿童营养的影响:差异分析。
BMJ. 2019 Dec 11;367:l6540. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6540.
10
The R0 package: a toolbox to estimate reproduction numbers for epidemic outbreaks.R0 包:用于估计传染病暴发的繁殖数的工具箱。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Dec 18;12:147. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-147.

德国新冠疫情期间违反封锁规定的处罚效果

Effectiveness of Penalties for Lockdown Violations During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany.

作者信息

Chae Seung Hoon, Park Hyung Jun

机构信息

Seung Hoon Chae is with the Humanities Division, Korea Military Academy, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Hyung Jun Park is with the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2020 Dec;110(12):1844-1849. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305903. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305903
PMID:33058699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7661973/
Abstract

To investigate whether the imposition of fines can mitigate the spread of COVID-19. We used quasi-experimental difference-in-difference models. On March 20, 2020, Bavaria introduced fines as high as €25 000 (US $28 186) against citizens in violation of the (federal state's) lockdown policy. Its neighboring (federal states), on the other hand, were slow to impose such clear restrictions. By comparing 38 (counties) alongside Bavaria's border from March 15 to May 11 using data from the Robert Koch Institute, we produced for each its (1) time-dependent reproduction numbers () and (2) growth rates in confirmed cases. The demographics of the were similar enough to allow for difference-in-difference analyses. that introduced fines on March 20 reduced the by a further 0.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.46, -0.18;  < .001) and decreased the growth rate in confirmed cases by an additional 6 percentage points (95% CI = -0.11, -0.02;  = .005) compared with the control group. Imposing fines may slow down the spread of COVID-19. Lockdowns may work better when governments introduce penalties against those who ignore them.

摘要

为了调查罚款措施是否能够减缓新冠病毒病(COVID-19)的传播。我们使用了准实验性双重差分模型。2020年3月20日,巴伐利亚州开始对违反(该联邦州的)封锁政策的公民处以高达25000欧元(28186美元)的罚款。另一方面,其相邻的(联邦州)则迟迟没有实施如此明确的限制措施。利用罗伯特·科赫研究所的数据,通过比较巴伐利亚州边境沿线的38个(县)在3月15日至5月11日期间的情况,我们为每个(县)计算了(1)随时间变化的繁殖数()和(2)确诊病例的增长率。(这些县的)人口统计学特征足够相似,从而可以进行双重差分分析。与对照组相比,3月20日开始实施罚款措施的(县)的繁殖数进一步降低了0.32(95%置信区间[CI]=-0.46,-0.18;<0.001),确诊病例的增长率额外降低了6个百分点(95%CI=-0.11,-0.02;=0.005)。实施罚款措施可能会减缓新冠病毒病(COVID-19)的传播。当政府对无视封锁措施的人实施处罚时,封锁措施可能会更有效。