• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reduction in US Health Care Spending Required to Meet the Institute of Medicine's 2030 Target.要实现美国医学研究所 2030 年的目标,需要减少美国医疗保健支出。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Dec;110(12):1735-1740. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305793. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
2
Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.美国和其他高收入国家的医疗保健支出。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150.
3
Past, present, and future of global health financing: a review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 195 countries, 1995-2050.全球卫生融资的过去、现在和未来:对 195 个国家 1995 年至 2050 年用于卫生的发展援助、政府、自付费用和其他私人支出的评估。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 1;393(10187):2233-2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30841-4. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
4
Comparison of historical medical spending patterns among the BRICS and G7.金砖国家与七国集团历史医疗支出模式比较。
J Med Econ. 2016;19(1):70-6. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1093493. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
5
Health spending projections through 2019: the recession's impact continues.2019 年之前的卫生支出预测:经济衰退的影响仍在持续。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Mar-Apr;29(3):522-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1074. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
6
Health care spending growth: how different is the United States from the rest of the OECD?医疗保健支出增长:美国与经合组织其他国家有何不同?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jan-Feb;26(1):154-61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.154.
7
International health care spending.国际医疗保健支出。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1986 Fall;5(3):111-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.5.3.111.
8
Health spending in OECD countries in 2004: an update.经合组织国家2004年的卫生支出:最新情况
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):1481-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1481.
9
Health care reform in the United States: radical surgery needed now more than ever.美国的医疗保健改革:现在比以往任何时候都更需要彻底的手术。 (注:这里的“surgery”在这种语境下用“变革、举措”等意更合适,整句准确译文应该是:美国的医疗保健改革:现在比以往任何时候都更需要彻底的变革。 )
Pain Physician. 2008 Jan;11(1):13-42.
10
Hong Kong domestic health spending: financial years 1989/90 to 2008/09.香港本地健康开支:1989/90 财政年度至 2008/09 财政年度。
Hong Kong Med J. 2012 Aug;18(4 Suppl 4):1-23.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing the Next Generation of Physician Changemakers: "You Have to Love the People, and Love the Process".培养下一代有变革能力的医生:“你必须热爱人民,热爱这个过程”。
Cureus. 2025 May 26;17(5):e84861. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84861. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Speaking Truth to Power: Making Optimal Health a Top National Priority.向权力说真话:将优化健康作为国家首要优先事项。
Am J Public Health. 2025 Mar;115(3):304-306. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307996.
3
Challenges and opportunities in enhanced recovery after surgery programs: An overview.手术后加速康复计划中的挑战与机遇:综述
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Nov;68(11):951-958. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_546_24. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
4
Does Anesthesia Quality Improvement Participation Lead to Incremental Savings in a Surgical Quality Collaborative Population? A Retrospective Observational Study.参与麻醉质量改进是否会导致手术质量协作人群的增量节省?一项回顾性观察研究。
Anesth Analg. 2023 Nov 1;137(5):1093-1103. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006565. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
5
The Opportunity Cost of COVID for Public Health Practice: COVID-19 Pandemic Response Work and Lost Foundational Areas of Public Health Work.新冠疫情对公共卫生实践的机会成本:COVID-19 大流行应对工作和公共卫生基础工作的流失。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023;29(Suppl 1):S64-S72. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001656. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
6
Comparison of Cancer-Related Spending and Mortality Rates in the US vs 21 High-Income Countries.美国与 21 个高收入国家的癌症相关支出和死亡率比较。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 May 27;3(5):e221229. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1229. eCollection 2022 May.
7
"It's Not Just the Right Thing . . . It's a Survival Tactic": Disentangling Leaders' Motivations and Worries on Social Care.“这不仅仅是正确的事情……这是一种生存策略”:厘清领导者在社会关怀方面的动机和担忧。
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Oct;79(5):701-716. doi: 10.1177/10775587211057673. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
8
Healthy People 2030: Moving toward equitable health and well-being in the United States.《健康人民2030:迈向美国公平的健康与福祉》
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Mar 6;33:100777. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100777. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
The (Still) Limited Contribution of Medical Measures to Declines in Mortality.医疗措施对死亡率下降的贡献(仍然)有限。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1053-1057. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12483. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Less Health Care, More Health: The Inverse U of Medical Spending and Health in the United States.医疗保健减少,健康增加:美国医疗支出与健康的倒U型关系
Am J Public Health. 2020 Dec;110(12):1755-1757. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305981.
2
Excess Medical Care Spending: The Categories, Magnitude, and Opportunity Costs of Wasteful Spending in the United States.过度医疗支出:美国浪费性支出的类别、规模和机会成本。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Dec;110(12):1743-1748. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305865. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
3
The Potential Effects of Coronavirus on National Health Expenditures.冠状病毒对国家卫生支出的潜在影响。
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2001-2002. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6644.
4
National Health Care Spending In 2018: Growth Driven By Accelerations In Medicare And Private Insurance Spending.2018 年国家医疗保健支出:医疗保险和私人保险支出加速推动增长。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):8-17. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01451. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
5
Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings.美国医疗体系中的浪费:估计成本和节约潜力。
JAMA. 2019 Oct 15;322(15):1501-1509. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13978.
6
Past, present, and future of global health financing: a review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 195 countries, 1995-2050.全球卫生融资的过去、现在和未来:对 195 个国家 1995 年至 2050 年用于卫生的发展援助、政府、自付费用和其他私人支出的评估。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 1;393(10187):2233-2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30841-4. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
7
National Health Expenditure Projections, 2018-27: Economic And Demographic Trends Drive Spending And Enrollment Growth.2018-2027 年全国卫生支出预测:经济和人口趋势推动支出和参保人数增长。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):491-501. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05499. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
8
It's Still The Prices, Stupid: Why The US Spends So Much On Health Care, And A Tribute To Uwe Reinhardt.还是价格问题:美国医疗保健支出为何如此之高——纪念乌韦·赖因哈特。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jan;38(1):87-95. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05144.
9
Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.美国和其他高收入国家的医疗保健支出。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150.
10
Public health and the economy could be served by reallocating medical expenditures to social programs.将医疗支出重新分配到社会项目中,可以为公共卫生和经济服务。
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Jan 22;3:185-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.01.004. eCollection 2017 Dec.

要实现美国医学研究所 2030 年的目标,需要减少美国医疗保健支出。

Reduction in US Health Care Spending Required to Meet the Institute of Medicine's 2030 Target.

机构信息

J. Mac McCullough and Matthew Speer are with the College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix. Sanne Magnan is with the Health Partners Institute, Minneapolis, MN, and the Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Jonathan E. Fielding and Steven M. Teutsch are with the Center for Health Advancement, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles. David Kindig is with the Population Health Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2020 Dec;110(12):1735-1740. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305793. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305793
PMID:33058710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7661993/
Abstract

To quantify changes in US health care spending required to reach parity with high-resource nations by 2030 or 2040 and identify historical precedents for these changes. We analyzed multiple sources of historical and projected spending from 1970 through 2040. Parity was defined as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) median or 90th percentile for per capita health care spending. Sustained annual declines of 7.0% and 3.3% would be required to reach the median of other high-resource nations by 2030 and 2040, respectively (3.2% and 1.3% to reach the 90th percentile). Such declines do not have historical precedent among US states or OECD nations. Traditional approaches to reducing health care spending will not enable the United States to achieve parity with high-resource nations; strategies to eliminate waste and reduce the demand for health care are essential. Excess spending reduces the ability of the United States to meet critical public health needs and affects the country's economic competitiveness. Rising health care spending has been identified as a threat to the nation's health. Public health can add voices, leadership, and expertise for reversing this course.

摘要

为了量化 2030 年或 2040 年实现与高资源国家平价所需的美国医疗保健支出变化,并为这些变化找到历史先例。我们分析了 1970 年至 2040 年期间多个来源的历史和预测支出。平价定义为经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)中位数或人均医疗保健支出的第 90 个百分位。要在 2030 年和 2040 年分别达到其他高资源国家的中位数(达到第 90 个百分位则分别需要 3.2%和 1.3%),则需要持续每年下降 7.0%和 3.3%。美国各州或经合组织国家都没有这种下降的历史先例。减少医疗保健支出的传统方法将使美国无法与高资源国家实现平价;消除浪费和减少医疗保健需求的策略至关重要。过度支出降低了美国满足关键公共卫生需求的能力,并影响了该国的经济竞争力。不断上升的医疗保健支出已被确定为威胁国家健康的因素。公共卫生可以为扭转这一局面增添声音、领导力和专业知识。