Suppr超能文献

中国大陆 COVID-19 和 SARS 爆发:基于国家监测数据的比较研究。

Outbreak of COVID-19 and SARS in mainland China: a comparative study based on national surveillance data.

机构信息

Institute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Institution of Hospital Management, Medical Innovation Research Division, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 15;10(10):e043411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043411.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the epidemiological characteristics and transmission dynamics in relation to interventions against the COVID-19 and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in mainland China.

DESIGN

Comparative study based on a unique data set of COVID-19 and SARS.

SETTING

Outbreak in mainland China.

PARTICIPANTS

The final database included 82 858 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 5327 cases of SARS.

METHODS

We brought together all existing data sources and integrated them into a comprehensive data set. Individual information on age, sex, occupation, residence location, date of illness onset, date of diagnosis and clinical outcome was extracted. Control measures deployed in mainland China were collected. We compared the epidemiological and spatial characteristics of COVID-19 and SARS. We estimated the effective reproduction number to explore differences in transmission dynamics and intervention effects.

RESULTS

Compared with SARS, COVID-19 affected more extensive areas (1668 vs 230 counties) within a shorter time (101 vs 193 days) and had higher attack rate (61.8 vs 4.0 per million persons). The COVID-19 outbreak had only one epidemic peak and one epicentre (Hubei Province), while the SARS outbreak resulted in two peaks and two epicentres (Guangdong Province and Beijing). SARS-CoV-2 was more likely to infect older people (median age of 52 years), while SARS-CoV tended to infect young adults (median age of 34 years). The case fatality rate (CFR) of either disease increased with age, but the CFR of COVID-19 was significantly lower than that of SARS (5.6% vs 6.4%). The trajectory of effective reproduction number dynamically changed in relation to interventions, which fell below 1 within 2 months for COVID-19 and within 5.5 months for SARS.

CONCLUSIONS

China has taken more prompt and effective responses to combat COVID-19 by learning lessons from SARS, providing us with some epidemiological clues to control the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic worldwide.

摘要

目的

比较中国内地针对 COVID-19 和严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)疫情采取的干预措施的流行病学特征和传播动力学。

设计

基于 COVID-19 和 SARS 的独特数据集进行的比较研究。

地点

中国内地疫情爆发地。

参与者

最终数据库包括 82858 例 COVID-19 确诊病例和 5327 例 SARS 病例。

方法

我们汇集了所有现有数据源,并将其整合到一个综合数据集中。提取了年龄、性别、职业、居住地点、发病日期、诊断日期和临床结局等个人信息。收集了中国内地部署的控制措施。我们比较了 COVID-19 和 SARS 的流行病学和空间特征。我们估计了有效繁殖数,以探讨传播动力学和干预效果的差异。

结果

与 SARS 相比,COVID-19 在更广泛的地区(1668 个县对 230 个县)、更短的时间(101 天对 193 天)内造成更大的影响,发病率更高(每百万人 61.8 例对 4.0 例)。COVID-19 疫情只有一个流行高峰和一个中心(湖北省),而 SARS 疫情有两个高峰和两个中心(广东省和北京市)。SARS-CoV-2 更容易感染老年人(中位数年龄 52 岁),而 SARS-CoV 则倾向于感染年轻成年人(中位数年龄 34 岁)。两种疾病的病死率(CFR)均随年龄增长而升高,但 COVID-19 的 CFR 明显低于 SARS(5.6%对 6.4%)。有效繁殖数的轨迹随着干预措施的变化而动态变化,COVID-19 在 2 个月内降至 1 以下,SARS 在 5.5 个月内降至 1 以下。

结论

中国从 SARS 中吸取教训,对 COVID-19 疫情做出了更迅速、更有效的反应,为我们提供了一些控制全球当前 COVID-19 大流行的流行病学线索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2db/7565247/54883c0eee28/bmjopen-2020-043411f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验