• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低能量飞秒激光与传统超声乳化白内障手术后的黄斑囊样水肿

Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser versus Conventional Phacoemulsification.

作者信息

Van Nuffel Stefaan, Claeys Matthias F, Claeys Marnix H

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

Okulus Eye Clinic, Kortrijk, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 25;14:2873-2878. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S261565. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S261565
PMID:33061272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7524180/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative changes in central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) and prevalence of cystoid macular edema (CME) in patients undergoing cataract surgery with low-energy femtosecond laser versus standard phacoemulsification.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective comparative real-world study.

METHODS

Postoperative data of 252 eyes of 165 patients were collected: 138 eyes received low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and 114 eyes underwent conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (CPCS). Postoperative changes in CSMT and prevalence of CME were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in mean CSMT from preoperative to postoperative values at 2.5 months in both the FLACS and CPCS group (<0.001). Mean change (preoperation to 2.5 months postoperation) in CSMT was 6.2±11.5 µm in the FLACS group and 7.3±26.6 µm in the CPCS group, which was statistically significant but clinically not relevant. Comparison of mean changes in CSMT (preoperation to 2.5 months postoperation) between the FLACS and CPCS groups revealed no significant differences. The rate of pseudophakic CME (PCME) development was lower in the FLACS group (1.4%) than the CPCS group (4.4%; =0.247). When using PREMED criteria to define clinically significant PCME, only 0.7% patients in the FLACS group and 1.8% in the CPCS group showed development of clinically significant PCME (=0.586).

CONCLUSION

The mean change in CSMT and occurrence of postoperative CME was lower in the low-energy FLACS group than the standard-phacoemulsification group; however, the difference was not statistically significant.

摘要

目的

比较接受低能量飞秒激光白内障手术与标准超声乳化白内障手术患者的黄斑中心子区域厚度(CSMT)术后变化及黄斑囊样水肿(CME)的发生率。

设计

这是一项回顾性比较真实世界研究。

方法

收集了165例患者252只眼的术后数据:138只眼接受了低能量飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS),114只眼接受了传统超声乳化白内障手术(CPCS)。比较两组CSMT的术后变化及CME的发生率。

结果

FLACS组和CPCS组在术后2.5个月时,平均CSMT从术前到术后值均有显著增加(<0.001)。FLACS组CSMT的平均变化(术前至术后2.5个月)为6.2±11.5 µm,CPCS组为7.3±26.6 µm,差异有统计学意义但临床意义不大。FLACS组和CPCS组之间CSMT的平均变化(术前至术后2.5个月)比较无显著差异。FLACS组人工晶状体眼CME(PCME)的发生率(1.4%)低于CPCS组(4.4%;P = 0.247)。当使用PREMED标准定义具有临床意义的PCME时,FLACS组仅0.7%的患者和CPCS组1.8%的患者出现具有临床意义的PCME(P = 0.586)。

结论

低能量FLACS组CSMT的平均变化及术后CME的发生率低于标准超声乳化组;然而,差异无统计学意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd01/7524180/9fc88b70c9be/OPTH-14-2873-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd01/7524180/e7cfa13796dc/OPTH-14-2873-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd01/7524180/c753b24fd0d4/OPTH-14-2873-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd01/7524180/9fc88b70c9be/OPTH-14-2873-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd01/7524180/e7cfa13796dc/OPTH-14-2873-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd01/7524180/c753b24fd0d4/OPTH-14-2873-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd01/7524180/9fc88b70c9be/OPTH-14-2873-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser versus Conventional Phacoemulsification.低能量飞秒激光与传统超声乳化白内障手术后的黄斑囊样水肿
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 25;14:2873-2878. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S261565. eCollection 2020.
2
Cystoid macular edema after low-energy femtosecond-assisted cataract surgery.低能量飞秒激光辅助白内障手术后的黄斑囊样水肿
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar;263(3):829-835. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06663-y. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
3
Comparison between refractive outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and standard phacoemulsification.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与标准超声乳化白内障吸除术的疗效比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 2;20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1277-9.
4
[Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery in patients with lens subluxation].[飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障手术治疗晶状体半脱位患者]
Vestn Oftalmol. 2018;134(3):65-72. doi: 10.17116/oftalma2018134365.
5
Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification in vitrectomized eyes - A prospective interventional study.玻璃体切割术后的飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术的临床疗效比较-一项前瞻性干预研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 1;72(9):1285-1290. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1804_23. Epub 2024 May 20.
6
Comparative study of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification in vitrectomized eyes.玻璃体切割术后眼的飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术的比较研究。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;46(6):624-629. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13133. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
7
Clinical outcomes and complications between FLACS and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery: a PRISMA-compliant Meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)与传统超声乳化白内障手术的临床结局及并发症:一项符合PRISMA标准的25项随机对照试验的Meta分析
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 18;14(7):1081-1091. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.07.18. eCollection 2021.
8
Cystoid macular edema after femtosecond laser-assisted versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与超声乳化白内障手术后的黄斑囊样水肿
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Nov;41(11):2373-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.04.031.
9
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in a public teaching hospital setting.公立教学医院环境下的飞秒激光辅助白内障手术
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb 2;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0693-6.
10
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification: comparison of internal aberrations and visual quality.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术的比较:眼内像差和视觉质量的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;260(3):901-911. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05441-4. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors and Cumulative Incidence of Cystoid Macular Edema After Simple Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单纯白内障手术后黄斑囊样水肿的危险因素及累积发病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 May 16;17(5):e84212. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84212. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Aqueous Proteomic and Metabolomic Profiles in Low-Energy vs High-Energy Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery.低能量与高能量飞秒激光辅助白内障手术中的房水蛋白质组学和代谢组学图谱
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Jan 2;66(1):10. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.1.10.
3
Cystoid macular edema after low-energy femtosecond-assisted cataract surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence of cystoid macular edema following routine cataract surgery using NSAIDs alone or with corticosteroids.单独使用非甾体抗炎药或联合使用皮质类固醇进行常规白内障手术后黄斑囊样水肿的发生率。
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2020 Jan-Feb;83(1):55-61. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20200010.
2
Changes in Pupil Area during Low-energy Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery.低能量飞秒激光辅助白内障手术期间瞳孔面积的变化
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2019 Jul 18;14(3):251-256. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v14i3.4780. eCollection 2019 Jul-Sep.
3
Novel Triamcinolone Acetonide-Loaded Liposomal Topical Formulation Improves Contrast Sensitivity Outcome After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery.
低能量飞秒激光辅助白内障手术后的黄斑囊样水肿
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar;263(3):829-835. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06663-y. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
4
Cataract: Advances in surgery and whether surgery remains the only treatment in future.白内障:手术进展以及手术在未来是否仍为唯一治疗方法。
Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2021 Oct 21;1(1):100008. doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2021.100008. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Comparison of Conventional and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Regarding Macula Behavior and Thickness.常规和飞秒激光辅助白内障手术对黄斑行为和厚度的比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 23;59(4):639. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040639.
6
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing 1-Year Outcomes of Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification.比较低能量飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术1年疗效的随机对照试验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 17;8:811093. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.811093. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.单手旋转超声乳化术与传统超声乳化术及飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的围手术期参数比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 18;14(12):1868-1875. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.12.09. eCollection 2021.
新型曲安奈德负载脂质体局部制剂改善飞秒激光辅助白内障手术后的对比敏感度。
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Nov;35(9):512-521. doi: 10.1089/jop.2019.0032. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
4
Refractive Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Manual Surgery: Comparing Efficacy and Safety in 3144 Eyes.激光辅助折射性白内障手术与传统手动手术:3144 只眼的疗效和安全性比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct;206:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
5
Changes in aqueous oxidative stress, prostaglandins, and cytokines: Comparisons of low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification.水相氧化应激、前列腺素和细胞因子的变化:低能量飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Feb;45(2):196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
A randomized controlled trial comparing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery.随机对照试验比较飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jan;45(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.08.033. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
7
Visual and Refractive Outcomes in Manual versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 1838 Eyes.手动与飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的视觉和屈光结果:1838 只眼的单中心回顾性队列分析。
Ophthalmology. 2018 Aug;125(8):1172-1180. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
8
Retinal and choroidal thickness after femtosecond laser-assisted and standard phacoemulsification.飞秒激光辅助与标准超声乳化术后视网膜和脉络膜厚度
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 21;11:1541-1547. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S127792. eCollection 2017.
9
A Meta-Analysis Comparing Postoperative Complications and Outcomes of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification for Cataract.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障手术术后并发症及预后的Meta分析
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:3849152. doi: 10.1155/2017/3849152. Epub 2017 Apr 30.
10
Effects of topical ketorolac tromethamine 0.45% on intraoperative miosis and prostaglandin E release during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.卡替洛尔(Ketorolac Tromethamine)滴眼液对飞秒激光辅助白内障手术中瞳孔缩小和前列腺素 E 释放的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Apr;43(4):492-497. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.01.011.