Khan Muhammad Naseeb Ullah, Morrison Natalie M V, Marshall Paul W
School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Pain Res. 2020 Sep 23;13:2377-2387. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S258314. eCollection 2020.
The relationship of low back pain, the world's top disabling condition, with functional disability is often explained by the mediation effect of fear, catastrophizing, and psychological distress. These relationships have not been explored within chronic back pain patients from a low socio-economic, predominantly Muslim country. Thus, it was unclear whether previously established pathways would be consistent in Pakistani pain patients to help guide Pakistani clinicians caring for back pain patients. This cross-sectional study translated English versions of questionnaires within the fear-avoidance model into Urdu, tested the clinimetric properties of the Urdu versions for people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) in Pakistan, and performed mediation analysis to investigate pathways of the fear-avoidance model.
Translation of questionnaires was completed in 4 steps using the forward-backward technique, with subsequent analyses for internal consistency (Cronbach's α), construct validity (Pearson's -value), and test-retest reliability (ICC -value). Multiple mediation analysis with bootstrapping was performed to analyze pathways within the fear-avoidance model from the Urdu translated questionnaires.
A total of 151 people from Pakistan with CLBP completed the questionnaires, with good results for internal consistency ( > 0.85), convergent validity ( > 0.59), and test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.85). The association of pain with disability was significant (=2.36, = 0.19, <0.001), and the indirect effect of the mediators explained 81% of pain intensity's total effect on disability. All mediators, apart from physical activity-related fear-avoidance beliefs, were significant mediators of the effect of pain intensity on disability.
The Urdu versions of the fear-avoidance questionnaires show good clinimetric properties for use in clinical settings and research in Pakistan. These analyses support existing data for the mediation effect of catastrophizing, psychological distress, and self-efficacy on pain-related disability, and extends these findings to suggest that fear about work may be more important in a relatively lower socioeconomic sample of pain patients.
腰痛是全球导致残疾的首要原因,其与功能障碍之间的关系通常通过恐惧、灾难化思维和心理困扰的中介作用来解释。在一个社会经济水平较低、主要为穆斯林的国家,尚未对慢性背痛患者群体中的这些关系进行研究。因此,此前确立的相关路径在巴基斯坦背痛患者中是否一致,能否帮助指导巴基斯坦临床医生护理背痛患者尚不清楚。这项横断面研究将恐惧回避模型中的问卷英文版本翻译成乌尔都语,测试了乌尔都语版本在巴基斯坦慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者中的测量学特性,并进行中介分析以探究恐惧回避模型的路径。
采用前后翻译技术分4步完成问卷翻译,随后进行内部一致性(Cronbach's α)、结构效度(Pearson相关系数)和重测信度(ICC值)分析。使用自抽样法进行多重中介分析,以分析乌尔都语翻译问卷中恐惧回避模型的路径。
共有151名来自巴基斯坦的CLBP患者完成了问卷,内部一致性(>0.85)、收敛效度(>0.59)和重测信度(ICC>0.85)结果良好。疼痛与残疾之间的关联显著(β=2.36,SE = 0.19,p<0.001),中介因素的间接效应解释了疼痛强度对残疾总效应的81%。除与身体活动相关的恐惧回避信念外,所有中介因素都是疼痛强度对残疾影响的显著中介因素。
恐惧回避问卷的乌尔都语版本在巴基斯坦的临床环境和研究中显示出良好的测量学特性。这些分析支持了关于灾难化思维、心理困扰和自我效能对疼痛相关残疾的中介作用的现有数据,并扩展了这些发现,表明在社会经济水平相对较低的疼痛患者样本中,对工作的恐惧可能更为重要。