Suppr超能文献

贝叶斯堆叠参数生存分析与脆弱性分量和区间删失失效时间:在食物过敏风险中的应用。

Bayesian Stacked Parametric Survival with Frailty Components and Interval-Censored Failure Times: An Application to Food Allergy Risk.

机构信息

Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Research, Triangle Park, NC, USA.

The Netherlands Organization, Utrechtseweg, Zeist, 3704 HE, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2021 Jan;41(1):56-66. doi: 10.1111/risa.13585. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

Abstract

To better understand the risk of exposure to food allergens, food challenge studies are designed to slowly increase the dose of an allergen delivered to allergic individuals until an objective reaction occurs. These dose-to-failure studies are used to determine acceptable intake levels and are analyzed using parametric failure time models. Though these models can provide estimates of the survival curve and risk, their parametric form may misrepresent the survival function for doses of interest. Different models that describe the data similarly may produce different dose-to-failure estimates. Motivated by predictive inference, we developed a Bayesian approach to combine survival estimates based on posterior predictive stacking, where the weights are formed to maximize posterior predictive accuracy. The approach defines a model space that is much larger than traditional parametric failure time modeling approaches. In our case, we use the approach to include random effects accounting for frailty components. The methodology is investigated in simulation, and is used to estimate allergic population eliciting doses for multiple food allergens.

摘要

为了更好地了解接触食物过敏原的风险,食物挑战研究旨在逐渐增加过敏原的剂量,直到过敏个体出现客观反应。这些剂量失败研究用于确定可接受的摄入量水平,并使用参数失效时间模型进行分析。尽管这些模型可以提供生存曲线和风险的估计,但它们的参数形式可能会对感兴趣的剂量的生存函数产生误导。描述数据的不同模型可能会产生不同的剂量失败估计。受预测推理的启发,我们开发了一种贝叶斯方法,基于后验预测堆叠来组合生存估计,其中权重的形成旨在最大化后验预测准确性。该方法定义了一个比传统参数失效时间建模方法大得多的模型空间。在我们的案例中,我们使用该方法包含随机效应,以考虑脆弱性成分。该方法在模拟中进行了研究,并用于估计多种食物过敏原的过敏人群引发剂量。

相似文献

3
Updated full range of Eliciting Dose values for Cow's milk for use in food allergen risk assessment.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 Oct;168:113381. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113381. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
4
Hazard characterisation in food allergen risk assessment: the application of statistical approaches and the use of clinical data.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 May;45(5):691-701. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.09.005. Epub 2006 Nov 10.
5
Updated population minimal eliciting dose distributions for use in risk assessment of 14 priority food allergens.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 May;139:111259. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111259. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
6
Deriving individual threshold doses from clinical food challenge data for population risk assessment of food allergens.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Nov;144(5):1290-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.07.046. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
7
How much is too much? Threshold dose distributions for 5 food allergens.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Apr;135(4):964-971. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.10.047. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
8
Risk assessment and food allergy: the probabilistic model applied to allergens.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 Jan;45(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.07.018. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The baked side: Cow's milk and egg protein threshold dose distributions in children reacting to baked milk and baked egg.
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Dec 16;18(1):101012. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.101012. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Simulated use of thresholds for precautionary allergen labeling: Impact on prevalence and risk.
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 20;10(13):e33316. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33316. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
3
Egg protein exposure estimation in risk assessment for Japanese food allergy labeling.
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 24;10(13):e33545. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33545. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
5
Reviewing the Chinese-Specific Reference Amounts Study Conducted by Sun et al., 2022.
China CDC Wkly. 2023 Aug 25;5(34):763-765. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2023.145.
6
Cow's milk and egg protein threshold dose distributions in children tolerant to beef, baked milk, and baked egg.
Allergy. 2022 Oct;77(10):3052-3060. doi: 10.1111/all.15397. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
7
8
Updated population minimal eliciting dose distributions for use in risk assessment of 14 priority food allergens.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 May;139:111259. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111259. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment.
EFSA J. 2017 Jan 24;15(1):e04658. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4658. eCollection 2017 Jan.
4
Deriving injury risk curves using survival analysis from biomechanical experiments.
J Biomech. 2016 Oct 3;49(14):3260-3267. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
5
Sesame allergy threshold dose distribution.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2015 Sep;83:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 May 30.
7
Establishment of Reference Doses for residues of allergenic foods: report of the VITAL Expert Panel.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2014 Jan;63:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.10.032. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
8
Threshold dose for peanut: risk characterization based upon published results from challenges of peanut-allergic individuals.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2009 Jun;47(6):1198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.02.011. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
10
Hazard characterisation in food allergen risk assessment: the application of statistical approaches and the use of clinical data.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 May;45(5):691-701. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.09.005. Epub 2006 Nov 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验