DTU Compute, Richard Petersens Plads, DK-2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
ANSES, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health Safety, 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 3;9(1):18206. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54844-1.
Peer-reviewed probabilistic methods already predict the probability of an allergic reaction resulting from an accidental exposure to food allergens, however, the methods calculate it in different ways. The available methods utilize the same three major input parameters in the risk model: the risk is estimated from the amount of food consumed, the concentration of allergen in the contaminated product and the distribution of thresholds among allergic persons. However, consensus is lacking about the optimal method to estimate the risk of allergic reaction and the associated uncertainty. This study aims to compare estimation of the risk of allergic reaction and associated uncertainty using different methods and suggest improvements. Four cases were developed based on the previous publications and the risk estimations were compared. The risk estimation was found to agree within 0.5% with the different simulation cases. Finally, an uncertainty analysis method is also presented in order to evaluate the uncertainty propagation from the input parameters to the risk.
同行评议的概率方法已经预测了因意外接触食物过敏原而导致过敏反应的概率,但这些方法的计算方式不同。现有的方法在风险模型中使用相同的三个主要输入参数:风险是根据食用的食物量、污染产品中过敏原的浓度以及过敏人群中阈值的分布来估计的。然而,对于估计过敏反应风险和相关不确定性的最佳方法,尚未达成共识。本研究旨在比较使用不同方法估计过敏反应风险和相关不确定性,并提出改进方法。根据以往的出版物,开发了四个案例,并对风险估计进行了比较。结果发现,风险估计与不同的模拟案例相差在 0.5%以内。最后,还提出了一种不确定性分析方法,以便评估从输入参数到风险的不确定性传播。