Blinded Clinical Ratings of Social Media Data are Correlated with In-Person Clinical Ratings in Participants Diagnosed with Either Depression, Schizophrenia, or Healthy Controls.

This study investigates clinically valid signals about psychiatric symptoms in social media data, by rating severity of psychiatric symptoms in donated, de-identified Facebook posts and comparing to in-person clinical assessments. Participants with schizophrenia (N=8), depression (N=7), or who were healthy controls (N=8) also consented to the collection of their Facebook activity from three months before the in-person assessments to six weeks after this evaluation. Depressive symptoms were assessed in- person using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), psychotic symptoms were assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and global functioning was assessed using the Community Assessment of Psychotic Experiences (CAPE-42). Independent raters (psychiatrists, non-psychiatrist mental health clinicians, and two staff members) rated depression, psychosis, and global functioning symptoms from the social media activity of deidentified participants. The correlations between in-person clinical ratings and blinded ratings based on social media data were evaluated. Significant correlations (and trends for significance in the mixed model controlling for multiple raters) were found for psychotic symptoms, global symptom ratings and depressive symptoms. Results like these, indicating the presence of clinically valid signal in social media, are an important step toward developing computational tools that could assist clinicians by providing additional data outside the context of clinical encounters.