Smith Danielle M, Shahab Lion, Blount Benjamin C, Gawron Michal, Kosminder Leon, Sobczak Andrzej, Xia Baoyun, Sosnoff Connie S, Goniewicz Maciej L
Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Toxics. 2020 Oct 14;8(4):88. doi: 10.3390/toxics8040088.
Country-level differences in nicotine vaping products used and biomarkers of exposure among long-term e-cigarette users and dual users remain understudied. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2014 in the United States ( = 166), United Kingdom ( = 129), and Poland ( = 161). We compared patterns of tobacco product use and nicotine and toxicant exposure among cigarette-only smokers ( = 127); e-cigarette-only users ( = 124); dual users of tobacco cigarettes and e-cigarettes ( = 95); and non-users (control group, = 110) across three countries using mixed-effects linear regression. Compared with cigarette smokers, e-cigarette-only users had lower levels of toxicant biomarkers, but higher levels of nicotine biomarkers. Dual users had higher levels of toxicant biomarkers than e-cigarette-only users but similar levels to cigarette-only smokers. E-cigarette users in Poland, who overwhelmingly used refillable tank devices, exhibited greater levels of nicotine, and toxicant biomarkers relative to e-cigarette users in US/UK. Despite smoking fewer cigarettes, dual users from Poland exhibited similar levels of nicotine biomarkers compared with UK dual users, but higher than US dual users. Country-level differences in e-cigarette devices used and smoking behaviors (e.g., intensity) may contribute to differences in biomarker levels among users of the same products residing in different countries.
长期电子烟使用者和双重使用者所使用的尼古丁雾化产品及接触生物标志物在国家层面上的差异仍未得到充分研究。这项横断面研究于2014年在美国(n = 166)、英国(n = 129)和波兰(n = 161)进行。我们使用混合效应线性回归,比较了仅吸烟的吸烟者(n = 127)、仅使用电子烟的使用者(n = 124)、同时使用烟草香烟和电子烟的双重使用者(n = 95)以及非使用者(对照组,n = 110)在三个国家的烟草产品使用模式以及尼古丁和有毒物质接触情况。与吸烟者相比,仅使用电子烟的使用者有毒物质生物标志物水平较低,但尼古丁生物标志物水平较高。双重使用者的有毒物质生物标志物水平高于仅使用电子烟的使用者,但与仅吸烟的吸烟者水平相似。波兰的电子烟使用者绝大多数使用可再填充的储液罐装置,相对于美国/英国的电子烟使用者,他们的尼古丁和有毒物质生物标志物水平更高。尽管波兰的双重使用者吸烟较少,但与英国的双重使用者相比,他们的尼古丁生物标志物水平相似,但高于美国的双重使用者。所使用的电子烟装置和吸烟行为(如强度)在国家层面上的差异可能导致居住在不同国家的同一产品使用者的生物标志物水平存在差异。