Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University at Buffalo, NY, USA.
Addiction. 2019 Jul;114(7):1236-1248. doi: 10.1111/add.14602. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
Vaporized nicotine products (VNPs) can vary in important characteristics including size, shape, flavor and nicotine yield. We examined whether complex interactions among these characteristics could affect smokers' VNP perceptions and usage patterns.
A within-subject randomized cross-over trial.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Eighteen daily cigarette smokers.
Participants attended eight weekly visits during which they sampled six different VNPs (disposable, rechargeable, eGO, mod, e-Cigar and e-Pipe) with tobacco-flavored e-liquid. Prior to device use, participants completed product-ranking questionnaires. Participants completed controlled puffing sessions during each of the six trials, after which satisfaction questionnaires were completed and blood samples were taken.
Initial perceptions showed that the smallest device (disposable) was ranked as safer compared with a larger device (e-Pipe) (P < 0.05). Participants rated the eGO and mod devices higher on satisfaction and enjoyment from use, taste, pleasantness, harshness ('throat hit') and speed of effect, but lower on perceived health risk and embarrassment from use (P < 0.05). All devices had a lower C than the combustible cigarette (P < 0.05), but there were differences among devices (P < 0.05). The mod, e-Pipe and eGO provided the highest amount of perceived smoking urge relief, and this correlated strongly with C across all devices (R = 0.8614, P = 0.007). The perceived speed of urge relief was not correlated with T (R = 0.0035, P = 0.911) CONCLUSIONS: Daily cigarette smokers testing six types of vaporized nicotine products (VNPs) reported that they varied in taste, amount of withdrawal relief, harshness, embarrassment from use, perceived health risk and subjective and objective nicotine delivery. The eGO and mod models have properties that may make them most effective for cigarette substitution among smokers who intend to switch to a VNP.
蒸发尼古丁产品(VNPs)在大小、形状、口味和尼古丁产量等重要特征上可能存在差异。我们研究了这些特征之间的复杂相互作用是否会影响吸烟者对 VNP 的认知和使用模式。
一项基于个体的随机交叉试验。
美国纽约州布法罗市罗塞尔帕克综合癌症中心。
18 名每日吸烟的吸烟者。
参与者参加了八周的每周一次的访问,在此期间,他们使用烟草味的电子液体样本了六种不同的 VNPs(一次性、可充电、eGO、mod、e-Cigar 和 e-Pipe)。在使用设备之前,参与者完成了产品排名问卷。在进行了六次试验中的每一次之后,参与者完成了控制吸烟试验,并在完成后完成了满意度问卷并抽取了血液样本。
最初的认知表明,与较大的设备(e-Pipe)相比,最小的设备(一次性)被认为更安全(P<0.05)。参与者对 eGO 和 mod 设备的满意度和使用的享受程度、口味、愉悦度、刺激性(“喉咙冲击”)和效果的速度更高,但对健康风险和使用时的尴尬程度的评价较低(P<0.05)。与可燃香烟相比,所有设备的 C 都较低(P<0.05),但设备之间存在差异(P<0.05)。mod、e-Pipe 和 eGO 提供了最高的吸烟缓解感,并且这种缓解感与所有设备的 C 呈强相关(R=0.8614,P=0.007)。缓解感的感知速度与 T 不相关(R=0.0035,P=0.911)。
测试六种类型的蒸发尼古丁产品(VNPs)的每日吸烟的吸烟者报告说,它们在口味、戒断缓解量、刺激性、使用时的尴尬程度、感知健康风险以及主观和客观尼古丁传递方面存在差异。eGO 和 mod 模型具有的特性可能使它们在打算转向 VNP 的吸烟者中最有效地替代香烟。