• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双胞胎在 5 岁时的发育脆弱性的生物学和社会人口风险之间的关联:西澳大利亚的一项人口数据链接研究。

Associations between biological and sociodemographic risks for developmental vulnerability in twins at age 5: a population data linkage study in Western Australia.

机构信息

Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia

School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 16;10(10):e038846. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038846.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038846
PMID:33067288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7569973/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence of, and associations between, prenatal and perinatal risk factors and developmental vulnerability in twins at age 5.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression.

SETTING

Western Australia (WA), 2002-2015.

PARTICIPANTS

828 twin pairs born in WA with an Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) record from 2009, 2012 or 2015.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The AEDC is a national measure of child development across five domains. Children with scores <10th percentile were classified as developmentally vulnerable on, one or more domains (DV1), or two or more domains (DV2).

RESULTS

In this population, 26.0% twins were classified as DV1 and 13.5% as DV2. In the multivariable model, risk factors for DV1 were maternal age <25 years (adjusted OR (aOR): 7.06, 95% CI: 2.29 to 21.76), child speaking a language other than English at home (aOR: 6.45, 95% CI: 2.17 to 19.17), male child (aOR: 5.08, 95% CI: 2.89 to 8.92), age younger than the reference category for the study sample (≥5 years 1 month to <5 years 10 months) at time of AEDC completion (aOR: 3.34, 95% CI: 1.55 to 7.22) and having a proportion of optimal birth weight (POBW) <15th percentile of the study sample (aOR: 2.06, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.98). Risk factors for DV2 were male child (aOR: 7.87, 95% CI: 3.45 to 17.97), maternal age <25 (aOR: 5.60, 95% CI: 1.30 to 24.10), age younger than the reference category (aOR: 5.36, 95% CI: 1.94 to 14.82), child speaking a language other than English at home (aOR: 4.65, 95% CI: 1.14 to 19.03), mother's marital status as not married at the time of twins' birth (aOR: 4.59, 95% CI: 1.13 to 18.55), maternal occupation status in the lowest quintile (aOR: 3.30, 95% CI: 1.11 to 9.81) and a POBW <15th percentile (aOR: 3.11, 95% CI: 1.26 to 7.64).

CONCLUSION

Both biological and sociodemographic risk factors are associated with developmental vulnerability in twins at 5 years of age.

摘要

目的

调查产前和围产期风险因素与 5 岁双胞胎发育脆弱的相关性。

设计

使用双变量和多变量逻辑回归的回顾性队列研究。

地点

西澳大利亚州(WA),2002-2015 年。

参与者

2009 年、2012 年或 2015 年在 WA 出生且具有澳大利亚早期发展普查(AEDC)记录的 828 对双胞胎。

主要观察指标

AEDC 是一项针对五个领域儿童发展的全国性衡量标准。在一个或多个领域(DV1)或两个或更多领域(DV2)得分低于第 10 百分位数的儿童被归类为发育脆弱。

结果

在该人群中,26.0%的双胞胎被归类为 DV1,13.5%的双胞胎被归类为 DV2。在多变量模型中,DV1 的风险因素为母亲年龄<25 岁(调整后的比值比(aOR):7.06,95%CI:2.29 至 21.76)、儿童在家中说英语以外的语言(aOR:6.45,95%CI:2.17 至 19.17)、男性儿童(aOR:5.08,95%CI:2.89 至 8.92)、在 AEDC 完成时年龄小于研究样本参考类别(≥5 岁 1 个月至<5 岁 10 个月)(aOR:3.34,95%CI:1.55 至 7.22)和具有低于研究样本 15%的最佳出生体重比例(POBW)(aOR:2.06,95%CI 1.07 至 3.98)。DV2 的风险因素为男性儿童(aOR:7.87,95%CI:3.45 至 17.97)、母亲年龄<25 岁(aOR:5.60,95%CI:1.30 至 24.10)、年龄小于参考类别(aOR:5.36,95%CI:1.94 至 14.82)、儿童在家中说英语以外的语言(aOR:4.65,95%CI:1.14 至 19.03)、母亲在双胞胎出生时的婚姻状况未婚(aOR:4.59,95%CI:1.13 至 18.55)、母亲职业状况处于最低五分位数(aOR:3.30,95%CI:1.11 至 9.81)和 POBW<15%(aOR:3.11,95%CI:1.26 至 7.64)。

结论

生物学和社会人口学风险因素均与 5 岁双胞胎的发育脆弱有关。

相似文献

1
Associations between biological and sociodemographic risks for developmental vulnerability in twins at age 5: a population data linkage study in Western Australia.双胞胎在 5 岁时的发育脆弱性的生物学和社会人口风险之间的关联:西澳大利亚的一项人口数据链接研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 16;10(10):e038846. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038846.
2
Interpregnancy intervals and child development at age 5: a population data linkage study.孕次间隔与 5 岁儿童发育:一项基于人群数据的关联研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 23;11(3):e045319. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045319.
3
Associations between clusters of early life risk factors and developmental vulnerability at age 5: a retrospective cohort study using population-wide linkage of administrative data in Tasmania, Australia.早期生活风险因素聚类与 5 岁时发育脆弱性的关联:一项使用澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州全人群行政数据关联的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 20;10(4):e033795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033795.
4
Maternal age and offspring developmental vulnerability at age five: A population-based cohort study of Australian children.母亲年龄与五岁后代的发育脆弱性:基于澳大利亚儿童的人群队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Apr 24;15(4):e1002558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002558. eCollection 2018 Apr.
5
Influence of preterm birth on the association between gestational diabetes mellitus and childhood developmental vulnerability: a causal mediation analysis.早产对妊娠期糖尿病与儿童发育脆弱性之间关联的影响:因果中介分析。
World J Pediatr. 2024 Jan;20(1):54-63. doi: 10.1007/s12519-023-00741-7. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
6
Is early childhood development impeded by the birth timing of the younger sibling?儿童早期发展是否会受到弟弟妹妹出生时间的影响?
PLoS One. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0268325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268325. eCollection 2022.
7
Prenatal and perinatal risks for late language emergence in a population-level sample of twins at age 2.2岁时双胞胎群体样本中语言发育迟缓的产前和围产期风险。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1035-9.
8
Role of maternal age at birth in child development among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian children in their first school year: a population-based cohort study.出生时母亲年龄对澳大利亚本土和非本土儿童在入学第一年的儿童发育的影响:基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Jan;4(1):46-57. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30334-7. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
9
Children of parents who have been hospitalised with psychiatric disorders are at risk of poor school readiness.父母患有精神障碍而住院的儿童有准备入学不良的风险。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Oct;28(5):508-520. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000148. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
10
Gestational age and child development at school entry.入学时的胎龄与儿童发育。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 15;11(1):14522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93701-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Perinatal and early life risk factors of adverse early childhood developmental outcomes: Protocol for systematic review using socioecological model.围产期和生命早期不良儿童发展结局的风险因素:系统综述使用社会生态学模型的方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 17;19(10):e0311500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311500. eCollection 2024.
2
Is early childhood development impeded by the birth timing of the younger sibling?儿童早期发展是否会受到弟弟妹妹出生时间的影响?
PLoS One. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0268325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268325. eCollection 2022.
3
Gestational age and child development at school entry.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple risk exposures for reading achievement in childhood and adolescence.儿童和青少年阅读成就的多种风险因素。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 May;73(5):427-434. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211323. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
2
Maternal age and offspring developmental vulnerability at age five: A population-based cohort study of Australian children.母亲年龄与五岁后代的发育脆弱性:基于澳大利亚儿童的人群队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Apr 24;15(4):e1002558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002558. eCollection 2018 Apr.
3
Prenatal and perinatal risks for late language emergence in a population-level sample of twins at age 2.
入学时的胎龄与儿童发育。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 15;11(1):14522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93701-y.
4
Interpregnancy intervals and child development at age 5: a population data linkage study.孕次间隔与 5 岁儿童发育:一项基于人群数据的关联研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 23;11(3):e045319. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045319.
2岁时双胞胎群体样本中语言发育迟缓的产前和围产期风险。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1035-9.
4
Longitudinal Study of Language and Speech of Twins at 4 and 6 Years: Twinning Effects Decrease, Zygosity Effects Disappear, and Heritability Increases.4岁和6岁双胞胎语言与言语的纵向研究:双胎效应减弱,合子型效应消失,遗传度增加。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jan 22;61(1):79-93. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0366.
5
Twin-singleton developmental study of brain white matter anatomy.脑白质解剖结构的双胎-单胎发育研究
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Feb;38(2):1009-1024. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23435. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
6
Gestational Age and Kindergarten School Readiness in a National Sample of Preterm Infants.全国早产儿样本中的胎龄与幼儿园入学准备情况
J Pediatr. 2016 Nov;178:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.062. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
7
Multiple gestations and preterm birth.多胎妊娠与早产。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Apr;21(2):113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2015.12.010. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
8
Intrauterine growth pattern and birthweight discordance in twin pregnancies: a retrospective study.双胎妊娠的宫内生长模式及出生体重差异:一项回顾性研究。
Ital J Pediatr. 2014 May 5;40:43. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-40-43.
9
Prematurity and school readiness in a nationally representative sample of Australian children: does typically occurring preschool moderate the relationship?早产与澳大利亚儿童全国代表性样本中的入学准备:普遍存在的学前教育是否会缓和这种关系?
Early Hum Dev. 2014 Feb;90(2):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.09.015. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
10
Trajectories and predictors of developmental skills in healthy twins up to 24 months of age.健康双胞胎至 24 月龄时发育技能的轨迹和预测因素。
Infant Behav Dev. 2013 Dec;36(4):670-8. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Aug 7.