Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 15;11(1):14522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93701-y.
Studies have reported a dose-dependent relationship between gestational age and poorer school readiness. The study objective was to quantify the risk of developmental vulnerability for children at school entry, associated with gestational age at birth and to understand the impact of sociodemographic and other modifiable risk factors on these relationships. Linkage of population-level birth registration, hospital, and perinatal datasets to the Australian Early Development Census (AEDC), enabled follow-up of a cohort of 64,810 singleton children, from birth to school entry in either 2009, 2012, or 2015. The study outcome was teacher-reported child development on the AEDC with developmental vulnerability defined as domain scores < 10 percentile of the 2009 AEDC cohort. We used modified Poisson Regression to estimate relative risks (RR) and risk differences (RD) of developmental vulnerability between; (i) preterm birth and term-born children, and (ii) across gestational age categories. Compared to term-born children, adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics attenuated RR for all preterm birth categories. Further adjustment for modifiable risk factors such as preschool attendance and reading status at home had some additional impact across all gestational age groups, except for children born extremely preterm. The RR and RD for developmental vulnerability followed a reverse J-shaped relationship with gestational age. The RR of being classified as developmentally vulnerable was highest for children born extremely preterm and lowest for children born late-term. Adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics attenuated RR and RD for all gestational age categories, except for early-term born children. Children born prior to full-term are at a greater risk for developmental vulnerabilities at school entry. Elevated developmental vulnerability was largely explained by sociodemographic disadvantage. Elevated vulnerability in children born post-term is not explained by sociodemographic disadvantage to the same extent as in children born prior to full-term.
研究报告称,胎龄与较差的入学准备之间存在剂量依赖关系。本研究的目的是量化与出生时胎龄相关的儿童在入学时出现发育脆弱的风险,并了解社会人口学和其他可改变的危险因素对这些关系的影响。人群水平的出生登记、医院和围产期数据集与澳大利亚早期发展普查(AEDC)的链接,使 64810 名单胎儿童的队列能够从出生到 2009 年、2012 年或 2015 年入学进行随访。本研究的结果是教师根据 AEDC 报告的儿童发展情况,发育脆弱性定义为各领域得分低于 2009 年 AEDC 队列第 10 百分位数。我们使用改良泊松回归估计发育脆弱性的相对风险(RR)和风险差异(RD)在:(i)早产与足月出生儿童之间,以及(ii)在不同胎龄组之间。与足月出生的儿童相比,调整社会人口特征后,所有早产类别 RR 均减弱。进一步调整可改变的危险因素,如学前教育和在家阅读状况,除了极早产儿童外,对所有胎龄组都有一定的额外影响。发育脆弱性的 RR 和 RD 与胎龄呈反 J 形关系。被归类为发育脆弱的 RR 最高的是极早产出生的儿童,最低的是晚期足月出生的儿童。调整社会人口特征后,除了早期足月出生的儿童外,所有胎龄组的 RR 和 RD 均减弱。在足月出生之前出生的儿童在入学时面临更大的发育脆弱性风险。社会人口劣势在很大程度上解释了 RR 和 RD 的增加。足月后出生的儿童的脆弱性升高在很大程度上不能用社会人口劣势来解释,这与足月前出生的儿童不同。