Australian Centre for Precision Health, UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Curtin School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia.
World J Pediatr. 2024 Jan;20(1):54-63. doi: 10.1007/s12519-023-00741-7. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
Epidemiological studies examining the direct and indirect effects of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on offspring early childhood developmental vulnerability are lacking. Therefore, the aims of this study were to estimate the direct and indirect effects of GDM (through preterm birth) on early childhood developmental vulnerability.
We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study on the association between gestational diabetes mellitus and early childhood developmental vulnerability in children born in Western Australia (WA) using maternal, infant and birth records from the Midwives Notification, Hospitalizations, Developmental Anomalies, and the Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) databases. We used two aggregated outcome measures: developmentally vulnerable on at least one AEDC domain (DV1) and developmentally vulnerable on at least two AEDC domains (DV2). Causal mediation analysis was applied to estimate the natural direct (NDE), indirect (NIE), and total (TE) effects as relative risks (RR).
In the whole cohort (n = 64,356), approximately 22% were classified as DV1 and 11% as DV2 on AEDC domains. Estimates of the natural direct effect suggested that children exposed to GDM were more likely to be classified as DV1 (RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.10-1.31) and DV2 (RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.19-1.50) after adjusting for potential confounders. About 6% and 4% of the effect of GDM on early childhood developmental vulnerability was mediated by preterm birth for DV1 and DV2, respectively.
Children exposed to gestational diabetes mellitus were more likely to be developmentally vulnerable in one or more AEDC domains. The biological mechanism for these associations is not well explained by mediation through preterm birth.
缺乏研究检查妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)对后代幼儿期发育脆弱性的直接和间接影响的流行病学研究。因此,本研究的目的是估计 GDM(通过早产)对幼儿期发育脆弱性的直接和间接影响。
我们使用来自西澳大利亚州(WA)助产士通知、住院、发育异常和澳大利亚早期发展普查(AEDC)数据库中的产妇、婴儿和出生记录,对妊娠期糖尿病与儿童幼儿期发育脆弱性之间的关系进行了回顾性基于人群的队列研究。我们使用了两个聚合的结局测量:在至少一个 AEDC 域上发育脆弱(DV1)和在至少两个 AEDC 域上发育脆弱(DV2)。因果中介分析用于估计自然直接(NDE)、间接(NIE)和总(TE)效应作为相对风险(RR)。
在整个队列中(n=64356),大约 22%的人在 AEDC 域上被归类为 DV1,11%的人被归类为 DV2。估计自然直接效应表明,在调整潜在混杂因素后,暴露于 GDM 的儿童更有可能被归类为 DV1(RR=1.20,95%CI:1.10-1.31)和 DV2(RR=1.34,95%CI:1.19-1.50)。GDM 对幼儿期发育脆弱性的影响约有 6%和 4%分别通过早产为 DV1 和 DV2 中介。
暴露于妊娠期糖尿病的儿童在一个或多个 AEDC 域中更有可能发育脆弱。早产中介对这些关联的生物学机制尚不清楚。