• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在团队宽恕氛围中,领导者的悖论思维对团队建言行为的影响:以团队合作作为中介变量

In a team forgiveness climate, the influence of paradoxical thinking of leaders on the team voice behavior: Mediated by team cooperation.

作者信息

Chen Yijun, He Xu, Lu Lei, Gao Xiaoxiao

机构信息

School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, Macao, China.

College of Finance, Guizhou University of Commerce, Guiyang, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 15;17(3):e0265018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265018. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0265018
PMID:35290375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8923504/
Abstract

In order to clarify the influence of the paradoxical thinking of leaders on team voice behavior, a moderating mediation model was constructed to explore the mediating role of team cooperation and the moderating effect of team forgiveness climate based on the social exchange theory. Based on the "leader-employee" matching data of 477 employees from 101 teams, SPSS (Statistic Package for Social Science) and AMOS (a macro-micro model of Scotland) were used to analyze the three-stage data linear regression. The research conclusions indicate that: (1) The paradoxical thinking of leaders positively affects team voice behavior; (2) Team cooperation plays a completely mediating role in the relationship between the paradoxical thinking of leaders and team voice behavior; (3) The team forgiveness climate positively moderates the relationship between the paradoxical thinking of leaders and team cooperation, which means that their positive relationship is stronger in a higher forgiveness climate; (4) The team forgiveness climate moderates the mediating role of team cooperation between the paradoxical thinking of leaders and team voice behavior. Compared with a lower forgiveness climate, this moderating mediating effect is significant at a higher forgiveness level. This study clarifies the connection of the paradoxical thinking of leaders to the team voice behavior through team cooperation and has practical insights into how a team forgiveness climate promotes the team voice behavior.

摘要

为了厘清领导的悖论思维对团队建言行为的影响,基于社会交换理论构建了一个调节中介模型,以探究团队合作的中介作用以及团队宽恕氛围的调节效应。基于101个团队中477名员工的“领导-员工”匹配数据,运用SPSS(社会科学统计软件包)和AMOS(苏格兰宏观-微观模型)对三阶段数据进行线性回归分析。研究结论表明:(1)领导的悖论思维对团队建言行为具有正向影响;(2)团队合作在领导的悖论思维与团队建言行为的关系中起完全中介作用;(3)团队宽恕氛围正向调节领导的悖论思维与团队合作之间的关系,即宽恕氛围越高,二者的正向关系越强;(4)团队宽恕氛围调节团队合作在领导悖论思维与团队建言行为之间的中介作用。与较低的宽恕氛围相比,这种调节中介效应在较高的宽恕水平上显著。本研究通过团队合作厘清了领导的悖论思维与团队建言行为之间的联系,并对团队宽恕氛围如何促进团队建言行为具有实际启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8412/8923504/f465f2d2a820/pone.0265018.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8412/8923504/f465f2d2a820/pone.0265018.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8412/8923504/f465f2d2a820/pone.0265018.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
In a team forgiveness climate, the influence of paradoxical thinking of leaders on the team voice behavior: Mediated by team cooperation.在团队宽恕氛围中,领导者的悖论思维对团队建言行为的影响:以团队合作作为中介变量
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 15;17(3):e0265018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265018. eCollection 2022.
2
How Does Paradoxical Leadership Affect Employees' Voice Behaviors in Workplace? A Leader-Member Exchange Perspective.从领导-成员交换视角看矛盾型领导如何影响员工的工作场所中的建言行为
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4):1162. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041162.
3
Employee Voice: A Mechanism to Harness Employees' Potential for Sustainable Success.员工声音:挖掘员工潜力实现可持续成功的机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;19(2):921. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020921.
4
The Impact of Paradoxical Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model.悖论式领导对员工建言行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:537756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537756. eCollection 2020.
5
Effect of Organizational Socialization of New Employees on Team Innovation Performance: A Cross-Level Model.新员工组织社会化对团队创新绩效的影响:一个跨层次模型
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Apr 21;15:1017-1031. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S359773. eCollection 2022.
6
How Leader Narcissism Links to Team Voice Behavior: The Mediating Mechanisms of Leader Voice Solicitation and Team Voice Climate.领导者自恋如何与团队建言行为相关联:领导者建言征求与团队建言氛围的中介机制
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 18;12:751446. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751446. eCollection 2021.
7
The Trickle-Down Effect of Authoritarian Leadership on Unethical Employee Behavior: A Cross-Level Moderated Mediation Model.威权领导对员工不道德行为的涓滴效应:一个跨层次有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 6;11:550082. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.550082. eCollection 2020.
8
The Double-Edged Sword Effect of Paradoxical Leadership to Organizational Citizenship Behavior.矛盾型领导对组织公民行为的双刃剑效应
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Sep 10;15:2513-2527. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S380383. eCollection 2022.
9
Spiritual Leadership, Autonomous Motivation and Employee Craftsmanship Spirit: The Cross-Level Moderating Effect of Caring Ethical Climate.精神领导力、自主动机与员工工匠精神:关怀伦理氛围的跨层次调节效应
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Aug 2;15:1971-1988. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S358107. eCollection 2022.
10
How Can Job Crafting Be Reproduced? Examining the Trickle-Down Effect of Job Crafting from Leaders to Employees.工作重塑如何再现?检验工作重塑从领导者到员工的涓滴效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;17(3):894. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030894.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Nurses' Voice Behavior in Neonatal Intensive Care Units of Grade A Tertiary Hospitals in Sichuan Province: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.四川省三级甲等医院新生儿重症监护病房护士发声行为的现状及影响因素分析:一项多中心横断面研究
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Mar 24;2025:8175652. doi: 10.1155/jonm/8175652. eCollection 2025.
2
How does team reflexivity affect new generation employee cooperative behavior in China? A cross-level moderated mediation model.团队反思性如何影响中国新一代员工的合作行为?一个跨层次的有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 27;16:1365026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1365026. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Paradoxical Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model.悖论式领导对员工建言行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:537756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537756. eCollection 2020.
2
How Does Paradoxical Leadership Affect Employees' Voice Behaviors in Workplace? A Leader-Member Exchange Perspective.从领导-成员交换视角看矛盾型领导如何影响员工的工作场所中的建言行为
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4):1162. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041162.
3
The relational antecedents of voice targeted at different leaders.
When are clients helpful? Capitalising on client involvement in professional service delivery.
客户何时会有帮助?利用客户参与专业服务交付。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 22;18(2):e0280738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280738. eCollection 2023.
针对不同领导者的声音的关系先行因素。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Sep;98(5):841-51. doi: 10.1037/a0032913. Epub 2013 May 6.
4
Organizational climate and culture.组织氛围和文化。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:361-88. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
5
Speaking up in groups: a cross-level study of group voice climate and voice.群体发声:群体发声氛围与发声行为的跨层次研究
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jan;96(1):183-91. doi: 10.1037/a0020744.
6
The doormat effect: when forgiving erodes self-respect and self-concept clarity.受气包效应:当原谅他人侵蚀了自尊心和自我概念清晰度时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 May;98(5):734-49. doi: 10.1037/a0017838.
7
Mental set and creative thought in social conflict: threat rigidity versus motivated focus.社会冲突中的思维定式与创造性思维:威胁僵化与动机聚焦
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;95(3):648-61. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.648.
8
Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: a group norms approach.工作团队中的组织公民行为:一种群体规范方法。
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Dec;89(6):960-74. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.960.
9
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
10
The failure-tolerant leader.容错领导者。
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Aug;80(8):64-71, 148.