• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of the Presence and Behavior of In-Group and Out-Group Strangers on Moral Hypocrisy.内群体和外群体陌生人的存在及行为对道德伪善的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 15;11:551625. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551625. eCollection 2020.
2
Punishing hypocrisy: the roles of hypocrisy and moral emotions in deciding culpability and punishment of criminal and civil moral transgressors.惩罚伪善:伪善与道德情感在判定刑事和民事道德违规者的罪责及惩罚中的作用。
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(1):59-83. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.801339. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
3
Unveiling the Paradox of Selflessness: Exploring Perceptions of Hypocrisy and Priority Outgroup in Intergroup Moral Dilemmas.揭示无私的悖论:探索群体间道德困境中对伪善和优先外群体的认知。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Mar 20;17:1295-1311. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S452940. eCollection 2024.
4
Are Proselfs More Deceptive and Hypocritical? Social Image Concerns in Appearing Fair.自我中心者是否更具欺骗性和虚伪性?在展现公平方面对社会形象的关注。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 21;9:2268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02268. eCollection 2018.
5
Effects of anger, guilt, and envy on moral hypocrisy.愤怒、内疚和嫉妒对道德虚伪的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jan;38(1):129-39. doi: 10.1177/0146167211422365. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
6
Moral cleansing as hypocrisy: When private acts of charity make you feel better than you deserve.道德净化是伪善:当私人的慈善行为让你感觉自己比应得的要好时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Sep;119(3):540-559. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000195. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
7
Self-enhancement in moral hypocrisy: Moral superiority and moral identity are about better appearances.道德虚伪中的自我提升:道德优越感和道德认同关乎更好的表象。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 5;14(7):e0219382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219382. eCollection 2019.
8
Neural and Cognitive Signatures of Guilt Predict Hypocritical Blame.内疚的神经和认知特征预测虚伪的指责。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Nov;33(11):1909-1927. doi: 10.1177/09567976221122765. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
9
Online Moral Conformity: how powerful is a Group of Strangers when influencing an Individual's Moral Judgments during a video meeting?线上道德从众:在视频会议期间,一群陌生人在影响个体道德判断时的影响力有多大?
Curr Psychol. 2023 Jun 1:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04765-0.
10
Power increases hypocrisy: moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior.权力会滋生虚伪:说理时道貌岸然,行为上却不道德。
Psychol Sci. 2010 May;21(5):737-44. doi: 10.1177/0956797610368810. Epub 2010 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Dark Personality Traits and Moral Hypocrisy: The Mediating Role of Moral Disengagement.黑暗人格特质与道德伪善之间的关系:道德推脱的中介作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025 Mar 5;18:551-561. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S484993. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Moral cleansing as hypocrisy: When private acts of charity make you feel better than you deserve.道德净化是伪善:当私人的慈善行为让你感觉自己比应得的要好时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Sep;119(3):540-559. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000195. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
2
Moral Disengagement of Pure Bullies and Bully/Victims: Shared and Distinct Mechanisms.纯粹欺凌者和欺凌/受欺凌者的道德脱离:共同和独特的机制。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Sep;48(9):1835-1848. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01067-2. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
3
Self-enhancement in moral hypocrisy: Moral superiority and moral identity are about better appearances.道德虚伪中的自我提升:道德优越感和道德认同关乎更好的表象。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 5;14(7):e0219382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219382. eCollection 2019.
4
The Influence of Self-Relevance and Cultural Values on Moral Orientation.自我相关性和文化价值观对道德取向的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;10:292. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00292. eCollection 2019.
5
Are Proselfs More Deceptive and Hypocritical? Social Image Concerns in Appearing Fair.自我中心者是否更具欺骗性和虚伪性?在展现公平方面对社会形象的关注。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 21;9:2268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02268. eCollection 2018.
6
Unethical and inept? The influence of moral information on perceptions of competence.不道德且不熟练?道德信息对能力认知的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Feb;114(2):195-210. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000097.
7
The Origin of Social Evaluation, Social Eavesdropping, Reputation Formation, Image Scoring or What You Will.社会评价、社会偷听、声誉形成、形象评分或诸如此类事物的起源。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 14;7:1772. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01772. eCollection 2016.
8
The slow decay and quick revival of self-deception.自我欺骗的缓慢消解与迅速复苏。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 19;6:1075. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01075. eCollection 2015.
9
Moral hypocrisy in economic games-how prosocial behavior is shaped by social expectations.经济博弈中的道德伪善——亲社会行为如何受社会期望影响
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 14;5:897. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00897. eCollection 2014.
10
Punishing hypocrisy: the roles of hypocrisy and moral emotions in deciding culpability and punishment of criminal and civil moral transgressors.惩罚伪善:伪善与道德情感在判定刑事和民事道德违规者的罪责及惩罚中的作用。
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(1):59-83. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.801339. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

内群体和外群体陌生人的存在及行为对道德伪善的影响。

Effects of the Presence and Behavior of In-Group and Out-Group Strangers on Moral Hypocrisy.

作者信息

Bian Junfeng, Li Liang, Xia Xuan, Fu Xiaolan

机构信息

Research Center of Social Governance Innovation, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, China.

Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 15;11:551625. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551625. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551625
PMID:33071871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7533570/
Abstract

Moral hypocrisy (MH) occurs when people fail to practice what they preach. Despite the prevalence of the effect of social identity on an individual's MH, few empirical studies have explored contextual factors that may help reduce MH. By conducting two experiments based on the research paradigm of real stranger presence, we examined how in-group and out-group strangers' presence and moral behavior may contribute to reducing MH. The results of experiment 1 demonstrated that compared with the presence of out-group strangers, the presence of in-group strangers could effectively inhibit MH (no significant difference between participants reported and actual donation proportions was obtained). The results of experiment 2 replicated and extended the results of experiment 1, first by showing that the presence of in-group strangers could effectively inhibit MH and then by revealing the influence of present strangers' behavior (moral or hypocritical) on MH. The results indicated that strangers' moral behavior could effectively eliminate participants' MH, especially in the presence of in-group strangers. However, when present strangers exhibited hypocritical behavior, they exhibited no effect on participants' MH, irrespective of the condition of in-group and out-group strangers. The current study provides empirical support for theories related to MH and moral decision-making and contributes to the literature on in-group and out-group effects on MH and decision-making.

摘要

当人们不能践行自己所宣扬的内容时,道德伪善(MH)就会出现。尽管社会身份对个体道德伪善的影响普遍存在,但很少有实证研究探讨可能有助于减少道德伪善的情境因素。通过基于真实陌生人在场的研究范式进行两项实验,我们考察了内群体和外群体陌生人的在场以及道德行为如何有助于减少道德伪善。实验1的结果表明,与外群体陌生人在场相比,内群体陌生人在场能有效抑制道德伪善(参与者报告的捐赠比例与实际捐赠比例之间无显著差异)。实验2的结果重复并扩展了实验1的结果,首先表明内群体陌生人在场能有效抑制道德伪善,然后揭示了在场陌生人的行为(道德或伪善)对道德伪善的影响。结果表明,陌生人的道德行为能有效消除参与者的道德伪善,尤其是在内群体陌生人在场的情况下。然而,当在场陌生人表现出伪善行为时,无论内群体和外群体陌生人的情况如何,他们对参与者的道德伪善都没有影响。本研究为与道德伪善和道德决策相关的理论提供了实证支持,并为关于内群体和外群体对道德伪善及决策影响的文献做出了贡献。