• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将一个基于社区的参与式研究项目转移到促进社会劣势妇女的身体活动中——来自 BIG 15 年的经验。

Transferring a Community-Based Participatory Research Project to Promote Physical Activity Among Socially Disadvantaged Women-Experiences From 15 Years of BIG.

机构信息

Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Institute of Sports Science, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 24;8:571413. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.571413. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.571413
PMID:33072709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7542241/
Abstract

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an effective approach to health promotion, especially in relation to socially disadvantaged groups. However, the long-term implementation of CPBR-based projects on a broad scale is often challenging, and research regarding the sustainable transfer of participatory research is lacking. This limits the scaling-up and public health impact of CBPR. Therefore, this study examines the mechanisms utilized to transfer and sustain the BIG project, a multifaceted CBPR project aimed at promoting physical activity among women in difficult life situations. Borrowing from the RE-AIM framework, we analyzed project documentation and conducted a reflection workshop to investigate methods of transferring BIG to new sites as well as strategies from researchers to support project implementation and the maintenance of program activities at those sites. Moreover, we analyzed the reasons for discontinuing program activities at some former BIG sites and the costs involved in transferring BIG. Since its establishment in 2005, BIG was transferred to and implemented at 17 sites. As of the winter of 2019, the program activities were maintained at eight sites. The average duration of sites that continue to offer program activities was more than 9 years. Discontinued sites maintained project activities for an average of 4 years. According to the study findings, the extent of scientific support, the provision of seed funding, and the local project coordinator, the person managing the project at the site, all have a significant impact on the sustainability of the transfer. A patchwork of funding agencies was needed to finance scientific support and seed funding in BIG. The transfer of BIG projects accrued annual costs of approximately EUR20,000 per site; however, long-term project implementation resulted in a decline in the annual transfer costs of BIG. The sustainable transfer of CBPR is challenging but possible, and increased support of research and seed funding can facilitate long-term transfer. Nevertheless, other factors in the implementation setting are beyond scientific control. With scarce financial resources, researchers need to carefully balance the efforts of the sustainability and transfer of CBPR projects. To address this issue, there is a need for further research into the interrelationship of the sustainability and transfer of CBPR projects as well as increased long-term funding.

摘要

基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)是促进健康的有效方法,特别是对于社会弱势群体。然而,广泛实施基于 CPBR 的项目的长期实施通常具有挑战性,并且缺乏关于参与式研究可持续转移的研究。这限制了 CBPR 的扩大规模和对公共卫生的影响。因此,本研究探讨了用于转移和维持 BIG 项目的机制,BIG 项目是一个多方面的 CBPR 项目,旨在促进困难生活情况下的妇女进行身体活动。借鉴 RE-AIM 框架,我们分析了项目文件并进行了反思研讨会,以调查将 BIG 转移到新地点的方法以及研究人员支持项目实施和维持这些地点的计划活动的策略。此外,我们分析了一些前 BIG 地点停止计划活动的原因以及转移 BIG 的相关成本。自 2005 年成立以来,BIG 已转移到 17 个地点并实施。截至 2019 年冬季,该计划活动在 8 个地点得到维持。继续提供计划活动的地点的平均持续时间超过 9 年。停止活动的地点平均维持项目活动 4 年。根据研究结果,科学支持的程度、种子资金的提供以及当地项目协调员(即负责该地点项目的人员)都对转移的可持续性产生重大影响。需要拼凑各种资金来源来为 BIG 的科学支持和种子资金提供资金。BIG 项目的转移产生了每个地点每年约 20,000 欧元的年度成本;然而,长期的项目实施导致 BIG 的年度转移成本下降。CBPR 的可持续转移具有挑战性但却是可行的,增加对研究和种子资金的支持可以促进长期转移。然而,实施环境中的其他因素超出了科学控制范围。由于资金有限,研究人员需要仔细平衡 CBPR 项目的可持续性和转移的努力。为了解决这个问题,需要进一步研究 CBPR 项目的可持续性和转移的相互关系,并增加长期资金。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8462/7542241/94064a892cc3/fpubh-08-571413-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8462/7542241/94064a892cc3/fpubh-08-571413-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8462/7542241/94064a892cc3/fpubh-08-571413-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Transferring a Community-Based Participatory Research Project to Promote Physical Activity Among Socially Disadvantaged Women-Experiences From 15 Years of BIG.将一个基于社区的参与式研究项目转移到促进社会劣势妇女的身体活动中——来自 BIG 15 年的经验。
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 24;8:571413. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.571413. eCollection 2020.
2
The Long-Term Public Health Impact of a Community-Based Participatory Research Project for Health Promotion Among Socially Disadvantaged Women-A Case Study Protocol.基于社区的参与式研究项目对社会弱势群体女性健康促进的长期公共卫生影响:一项案例研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;9:628630. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.628630. eCollection 2021.
3
Scaling Up a Community-Based Exercise Program for Women in Difficult Life Situations in Germany-The BIG Project as a Case-Study.在德国为处于困境中的妇女扩大以社区为基础的锻炼项目-以 BIG 项目为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 7;18(18):9432. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189432.
4
"That's like therapy"-A qualitative study on socially disadvantaged women's views on the effects of a community-based participatory research project on their health and health behavior.“这就像治疗一样”——一项关于社会劣势女性对社区参与式研究项目对其健康和健康行为影响的看法的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 18;12:1339556. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339556. eCollection 2024.
5
Scaling Up Physical Activity Promotion Projects on the Community Level for Women in Difficult Life Situations and Older People: BIG-5 and GET-10-A Study Protocol.社区层面促进困难生活处境中的妇女和老年人身体活动项目的规模化:BIG-5 和 GET-10-A 研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;10:837982. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.837982. eCollection 2022.
6
"For me, it's just a piece of freedom"-Increased empowerment through physical activity promotion among socially disadvantaged women.“对我来说,这只是自由的一部分”——通过促进社会劣势妇女的身体活动增强权能。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 27;10:867626. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.867626. eCollection 2022.
7
Resilient communities? A qualitative interview study on sustaining a community project for health promotion among socially disadvantaged women during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic.韧性社区?在 COVID-19 大流行的头两年,对一项针对社会弱势女性健康促进的社区项目进行的定性访谈研究,以维持该项目。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 29;23(1):1654. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16593-9.
8
Empowerment through participation in community-based participatory research-effects of a physical activity promotion project among socially disadvantaged women.通过参与社区参与式研究实现赋权——一项针对社会劣势妇女的身体活动促进项目的效果。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 19;11:1205808. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1205808. eCollection 2023.
9
Using a participatory action research approach to explore, understand and evaluate well-being among children living in socially deprived areas in Southern Sweden: a study protocol.采用参与式行动研究方法探索、理解和评估瑞典南部社会贫困地区儿童的幸福感:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 3;14(8):e086406. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086406.
10
Sowing the seeds for sustainable change: a community-based participatory research partnership for health promotion in Indiana, USA and its aftermath.为可持续变革播下种子:美国印第安纳州一个基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系促进健康及其后续影响。
Health Promot Int. 2006 Dec;21(4):293-300. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal025. Epub 2006 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Making "inclusion" more than a buzzword: A critical interpretive synthesis of literature about recruiting seldom-heard groups in health research.让“纳入”不止是个流行语:关于在健康研究中招募罕有群体的文献的批判性解释性综述
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 12;20(6):e0318466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318466. eCollection 2025.
2
[Effects of citizen involvement and participation in knowledge processes of integrated municipal health promotion: a systematic scoping review].[公民参与和参与城市综合健康促进知识过程的影响:一项系统的范围综述]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Mar;68(3):323-335. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04013-9. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation and scale-up of physical activity and behavioural nutrition interventions: an evaluation roadmap.体力活动和行为营养干预措施的实施和扩大:评估路线图。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 7;16(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0868-4.
2
Scaling up Evidence-Based Interventions Within the US Public Health Market.在美国公共卫生市场中扩大基于证据的干预措施。
Prev Sci. 2019 Nov;20(8):1169-1172. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01056-8.
3
Scaling up Evidence-Based Interventions in US Public Systems to Prevent Behavioral Health Problems: Challenges and Opportunities.
"That's like therapy"-A qualitative study on socially disadvantaged women's views on the effects of a community-based participatory research project on their health and health behavior.
“这就像治疗一样”——一项关于社会劣势女性对社区参与式研究项目对其健康和健康行为影响的看法的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 18;12:1339556. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339556. eCollection 2024.
4
The Limitations and Potentials of Evaluating Economic Aspects of Community-Based Health Promotion: A Critical Review.评价基于社区的健康促进的经济方面的局限性和潜力:批判性回顾。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Mar;22(2):165-179. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
5
Preferences of women in difficult life situations for a physical activity programme: protocol of a discrete choice experiment in the German NU-BIG project.困难生活情境下的女性对身体活动项目的偏好:德国 NU-BIG 项目中离散选择实验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 17;13(7):e067235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067235.
6
Impact of a CBPR-informed physical activity intervention before and during COVID-19 among women from a disadvantaged neighborhood in Sweden.在 COVID-19 期间,基于 CBPR 的身体活动干预对瑞典贫困社区女性的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;10:997329. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.997329. eCollection 2022.
7
The CIVISANO protocol: a mixed-method study about the role of objective and perceived environmental factors on physical activity and eating behavior among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults.CIVISANO协议:一项关于客观和感知环境因素对社会经济弱势成年人身体活动和饮食行为影响的混合方法研究。
Arch Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;80(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00956-6.
8
"For me, it's just a piece of freedom"-Increased empowerment through physical activity promotion among socially disadvantaged women.“对我来说,这只是自由的一部分”——通过促进社会劣势妇女的身体活动增强权能。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 27;10:867626. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.867626. eCollection 2022.
9
Scaling Up Physical Activity Promotion Projects on the Community Level for Women in Difficult Life Situations and Older People: BIG-5 and GET-10-A Study Protocol.社区层面促进困难生活处境中的妇女和老年人身体活动项目的规模化:BIG-5 和 GET-10-A 研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;10:837982. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.837982. eCollection 2022.
10
Development of a Framework for Scaling Up Community-Based Health Promotion: A Best Fit Framework Synthesis.发展社区健康促进扩大规模的框架:最佳契合框架综合。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;19(8):4773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084773.
在美国公共系统中扩大基于证据的干预措施以预防行为健康问题:挑战与机遇。
Prev Sci. 2019 Nov;20(8):1147-1168. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01048-8.
4
Community participation in health services development, implementation, and evaluation: A systematic review of empowerment, health, community, and process outcomes.社区参与卫生服务的发展、实施和评估:赋权、健康、社区和过程结果的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 May 10;14(5):e0216112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216112. eCollection 2019.
5
What happens once a program has been implemented? A call for research investigating strategies to enhance public health program sustainability.一个项目实施后会发生什么?呼吁开展研究,探索提高公共卫生项目可持续性的策略。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019 Feb;43(1):3-4. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12867. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
6
Sustainability of public health interventions: where are the gaps?公共卫生干预措施的可持续性:差距在哪里?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 15;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0405-y.
7
How can the impact of national recommendations for physical activity be increased? Experiences from Germany.如何提高国家推荐身体活动的影响力?来自德国的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 14;16(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0396-8.
8
Implementation and scale up of population physical activity interventions for clinical and community settings: the PRACTIS guide.人群体力活动干预在临床和社区环境中的实施和推广:PRACTIS 指南。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jun 8;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0678-0.
9
The Sustainability of Evidence-Based Interventions and Practices in Public Health and Health Care.循证干预措施和实践在公共卫生和医疗保健中的可持续性。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:55-76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014731. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
10
Scaling up complex interventions: insights from a realist synthesis.扩大复杂干预措施:基于实在论综合分析的见解
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Dec 19;14(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0158-4.