• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在德国为处于困境中的妇女扩大以社区为基础的锻炼项目-以 BIG 项目为例。

Scaling Up a Community-Based Exercise Program for Women in Difficult Life Situations in Germany-The BIG Project as a Case-Study.

机构信息

Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-University, 91058 Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.

Matrix GmbH & Co. KG, 91301 Forchheim, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 7;18(18):9432. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189432.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18189432
PMID:34574356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8468862/
Abstract

Scaling up community-based participatory research (CBPR) remains challenging. This case-study reports on how, and under which conditions, a CBPR project aiming at promoting exercise among socially disadvantaged women (BIG) scaled up at four project sites. As part of BIG, researchers support city administrations in implementing a participatory project to reach socially disadvantaged women for exercise. The case study was conducted in winter 2020 in southern Germany and is based on a co-creative process involving city administrators and researchers. Following Kohl and Cooley's scaling up dimensions, scaling up BIG was investigated at the four sites using a mixed-method approach. Course registrations and offers were analysed, and qualitative interviews ( = 4) with administrative staff members were conducted and analysed using content analysis. The geographical coverage of exercise classes, the addressed groups, and the utilisation of participatory methods by city administrations are described. All four sites managed to scale-up project activities. Three of the four sites reported that further growth of the project was no longer possible due to limited resources. All sites attempted to reach a larger number of, and more diverse, women. One site managed to scale-up the use of participatory methods within the city administration. The following important facilitators for scaling up CBPR projects were reported: advertisements tailored to the needs of the addressed women, utilising participatory approaches, and equipping project coordinators with sufficient resources.

摘要

将基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)扩大规模仍然具有挑战性。本案例研究报告了一个旨在促进社会劣势妇女(BIG)运动的 CBPR 项目如何以及在哪些条件下在四个项目点扩大规模。作为 BIG 的一部分,研究人员支持城市管理部门实施一项参与式项目,以吸引社会劣势妇女参加运动。该案例研究于 2020 年冬季在德国南部进行,基于涉及城市管理人员和研究人员的共创过程。根据 Kohl 和 Cooley 的扩展维度,采用混合方法在四个地点对 BIG 的扩展进行了调查。分析了课程注册和提供情况,并对行政人员进行了 4 次定性访谈(=4),并使用内容分析对访谈进行了分析。描述了运动课程的地理覆盖范围、所涉及的群体以及城市管理部门使用参与式方法的情况。所有四个地点都设法扩大了项目活动的规模。四个地点中有三个报告说,由于资源有限,项目的进一步增长是不可能的。所有地点都试图吸引更多、更多样化的女性。一个地点设法在城市管理部门内扩大参与式方法的使用。报告了以下对 CBPR 项目扩大规模的重要促进因素:针对所涉及妇女的需求定制的广告、利用参与式方法以及为项目协调员配备足够的资源。

相似文献

1
Scaling Up a Community-Based Exercise Program for Women in Difficult Life Situations in Germany-The BIG Project as a Case-Study.在德国为处于困境中的妇女扩大以社区为基础的锻炼项目-以 BIG 项目为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 7;18(18):9432. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189432.
2
Transferring a Community-Based Participatory Research Project to Promote Physical Activity Among Socially Disadvantaged Women-Experiences From 15 Years of BIG.将一个基于社区的参与式研究项目转移到促进社会劣势妇女的身体活动中——来自 BIG 15 年的经验。
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 24;8:571413. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.571413. eCollection 2020.
3
The Long-Term Public Health Impact of a Community-Based Participatory Research Project for Health Promotion Among Socially Disadvantaged Women-A Case Study Protocol.基于社区的参与式研究项目对社会弱势群体女性健康促进的长期公共卫生影响:一项案例研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;9:628630. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.628630. eCollection 2021.
4
Scaling Up Physical Activity Promotion Projects on the Community Level for Women in Difficult Life Situations and Older People: BIG-5 and GET-10-A Study Protocol.社区层面促进困难生活处境中的妇女和老年人身体活动项目的规模化:BIG-5 和 GET-10-A 研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;10:837982. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.837982. eCollection 2022.
5
"That's like therapy"-A qualitative study on socially disadvantaged women's views on the effects of a community-based participatory research project on their health and health behavior.“这就像治疗一样”——一项关于社会劣势女性对社区参与式研究项目对其健康和健康行为影响的看法的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 18;12:1339556. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339556. eCollection 2024.
6
"For me, it's just a piece of freedom"-Increased empowerment through physical activity promotion among socially disadvantaged women.“对我来说,这只是自由的一部分”——通过促进社会劣势妇女的身体活动增强权能。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 27;10:867626. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.867626. eCollection 2022.
7
Resilient communities? A qualitative interview study on sustaining a community project for health promotion among socially disadvantaged women during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic.韧性社区?在 COVID-19 大流行的头两年,对一项针对社会弱势女性健康促进的社区项目进行的定性访谈研究,以维持该项目。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 29;23(1):1654. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16593-9.
8
Empowerment through participation in community-based participatory research-effects of a physical activity promotion project among socially disadvantaged women.通过参与社区参与式研究实现赋权——一项针对社会劣势妇女的身体活动促进项目的效果。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 19;11:1205808. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1205808. eCollection 2023.
9
Cluster-randomised trial on participatory community-based outdoor physical activity promotion programs in adults aged 65-75 years in Germany: protocol of the OUTDOOR ACTIVE intervention trial.德国针对 65-75 岁老年人的基于社区的参与式户外体育活动促进项目的整群随机试验:户外积极干预试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 23;18(1):1197. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6124-z.
10
Enabling the powerful? Participatory action research with local policymakers and professionals for physical activity promotion with women in difficult life situations.使有权者能够参与进来?与地方政策制定者和专业人员一起开展参与式行动研究,促进处于困境中的妇女进行身体活动。
Health Promot Int. 2014 Mar;29(1):171-84. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das050. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
What Policies Do Local Governments Use to Promote Physical Activity? A Comparative Analysis of Municipalities From 4 EU Countries and Japan.地方政府采用哪些政策来促进体育活动?对来自4个欧盟国家和日本的城市的比较分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8594. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8594. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
The challenge of participatory projects for physical activity promotion: What to scale and how to scale?促进身体活动的参与式项目面临的挑战:扩大什么以及如何扩大?
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 30;20(6):e0326737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326737. eCollection 2025.
3
[Effects of citizen involvement and participation in knowledge processes of integrated municipal health promotion: a systematic scoping review].

本文引用的文献

1
Health-enhancing physical activity during leisure time among adults in Germany.德国成年人在休闲时间进行的增进健康的体育活动。
J Health Monit. 2017 Jun 14;2(2):35-42. doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2017-040. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
Regional health differences - developing a socioeconomic deprivation index for Germany.地区健康差异——为德国制定社会经济剥夺指数
J Health Monit. 2017 Jun 14;2(2):98-114. doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2017-048.2. eCollection 2017 Jun.
3
How effective are physical activity interventions when they are scaled-up: a systematic review.
[公民参与和参与城市综合健康促进知识过程的影响:一项系统的范围综述]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Mar;68(3):323-335. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04013-9. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
4
The Limitations and Potentials of Evaluating Economic Aspects of Community-Based Health Promotion: A Critical Review.评价基于社区的健康促进的经济方面的局限性和潜力:批判性回顾。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Mar;22(2):165-179. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
当体育活动干预措施扩大规模时,其效果如何:系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 22;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01080-4.
4
Transferring a Community-Based Participatory Research Project to Promote Physical Activity Among Socially Disadvantaged Women-Experiences From 15 Years of BIG.将一个基于社区的参与式研究项目转移到促进社会劣势妇女的身体活动中——来自 BIG 15 年的经验。
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 24;8:571413. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.571413. eCollection 2020.
5
Scaling up population health interventions from decision to sustainability - a window of opportunity? A qualitative view from policy-makers.扩大从决策到可持续性的人群健康干预措施——一个机遇之窗?政策制定者的定性观点。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Oct 9;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00636-3.
6
Developing a framework to inform scale-up success for population health interventions: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature.制定框架以告知人口健康干预措施的扩大成功:对文献的批判性综合分析。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 Apr 29;5:18. doi: 10.1186/s41256-020-00141-8. eCollection 2020.
7
Implementation and scale-up of physical activity and behavioural nutrition interventions: an evaluation roadmap.体力活动和行为营养干预措施的实施和扩大:评估路线图。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 7;16(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0868-4.
8
The unpredictable journeys of spreading, sustaining and scaling healthcare innovations: a scoping review.传播、维持和扩大医疗保健创新的不可预测之旅:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Sep 13;17(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0482-6.
9
Reaching the "Hard-to-Reach": Recruitment of Rural-Dwelling Adults With Disabilities.难以接触的人群:农村地区残疾成年人的招募。
J Transcult Nurs. 2020 Mar;31(2):171-177. doi: 10.1177/1043659619856667. Epub 2019 Jun 16.
10
Community participation in health services development, implementation, and evaluation: A systematic review of empowerment, health, community, and process outcomes.社区参与卫生服务的发展、实施和评估:赋权、健康、社区和过程结果的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 May 10;14(5):e0216112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216112. eCollection 2019.