Goenka Anuj, Ma Daniel, Teckie Sewit, Alfano Catherine, Bloom Beatrice, Hwang Jamie, Potters Louis
Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success, New York.
Cancer Care Management and Research, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success, New York.
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan-Feb;6(1):100575. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
The widespread coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in significant changes in care delivery among radiation oncology practices and has demanded the rapid incorporation of telehealth. However, the impact of a large-scale transition to telehealth in radiation oncology on patient access to care and the viability of care delivery are largely unknown. In this manuscript, we review our implementation and report data on patient access to care and billing implications. Because telehealth is likely to continue after COVID-19, we propose a radiation oncology-specific algorithm for telehealth.
In March 2020, our department began to use telehealth for all new consults, posttreatment encounters, and follow-up appointments. Billable encounters from January to April 2020 were reviewed and categorized into 1 of the following visit types: in-person, telephonic, or 2-way audio-video. Logistic regression models tested whether visit type differed by patient age, income, or provider.
There was a 35% decrease in billable activity from January to April. In-person visits decreased from 100% to 21%. Sixty percent of telehealth appointments in April were performed with 2-way audio-video and 40% by telephone only. In-person consultation visits were associated with higher billing codes compared with 2-way audio-video telehealth visits ( < .01). No difference was seen for follow-up visits. Univariate and multivariable analysis identified that older patient age was associated with reduced likelihood of 2-way audio-video encounters ( < .01). The physician conducting the telehealth appointment was also associated with the type of visit ( < .01). Patient income was not associated with the type of telehealth visit.
Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been able to move the majority of patient visits to telehealth but have observed inconsistent utilization of the audio-video telehealth platform. We present guidelines and quality metrics for incorporating telehealth into radiation oncology practice, based on type of encounter and disease subsite.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的广泛流行导致放射肿瘤学实践中的护理提供发生了重大变化,并要求迅速纳入远程医疗。然而,放射肿瘤学向远程医疗的大规模转变对患者获得护理的机会以及护理提供的可行性的影响在很大程度上尚不清楚。在本手稿中,我们回顾了我们的实施情况,并报告了关于患者获得护理的情况以及计费影响的数据。由于远程医疗在COVID-19之后可能会继续存在,我们提出了一种针对放射肿瘤学的远程医疗算法。
2020年3月,我们科室开始将远程医疗用于所有新的会诊、治疗后随访和后续预约。对2020年1月至4月的可计费会诊进行了审查,并将其分类为以下就诊类型之一:面对面、电话或双向音频视频。逻辑回归模型测试了就诊类型是否因患者年龄、收入或提供者而异。
1月至4月可计费活动减少了35%。面对面就诊从100%降至21%。4月60%的远程医疗预约采用双向音频视频方式,40%仅通过电话进行。与双向音频视频远程医疗就诊相比,面对面会诊就诊的计费代码更高(<0.01)。随访就诊未见差异。单因素和多因素分析确定,老年患者进行双向音频视频会诊的可能性降低(<0.01)。进行远程医疗预约的医生也与就诊类型有关(<0.01)。患者收入与远程医疗就诊类型无关。
自COVID-19大流行开始以来,我们已能够将大多数患者就诊转移到远程医疗,但观察到音频视频远程医疗平台的使用不一致。我们根据会诊类型和疾病亚部位,提出了将远程医疗纳入放射肿瘤学实践的指南和质量指标。