Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Pers Disord. 2020 Oct;34(5):586-608. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2020.34.5.586.
The alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) groups traits into domains based on factor analyses of self-report data. AMPD traits may need to be configured differently to interface with neurobiology. Focusing on biobehavioral risk for externalizing problems in 334 adults, the authors used structural modeling to evaluate how well alternative configurations of AMPD traits, operationalized using the Personality Inventory for (PID-5), interface with neural indicators of externalizing liability. A model specifying two correlated factors defined by traits within the PID-5 Disinhibition domain and brain-response indicators of externalizing proneness exhibited inadequate fit. However, a model using PID-5 traits with better coverage of biobehavioral externalizing liability evidenced good fit. Scores on this PID-5 trait factor, termed "PID-5 Externalizing Proneness," converged well with criterion measures of externalizing proneness and diverged from measures of threat sensitivity. Findings illustrate how AMPD traits can be configured for use in investigations of biobehavioral risk for psychopathology.
人格障碍的替代模型(AMPD)根据自我报告数据的因素分析将特质分为不同的领域。AMPD 特质可能需要进行不同的配置,以与神经生物学接口。作者关注 334 名成年人的外化问题的生物行为风险,使用结构建模来评估人格障碍特质的替代配置(使用人格障碍检查表 5 项人格特质问卷 [PID-5] 操作化)如何与外化倾向的神经指标接口。指定由 PID-5 去抑制域内特质和外部倾向大脑反应指标定义的两个相关因素的模型表现出不适当的拟合。然而,使用 PID-5 特质更好地涵盖生物行为外化倾向的模型表现出良好的拟合。这个 PID-5 特质因素的分数,称为“PID-5 外化倾向”,与外化倾向的标准测量值很好地收敛,与威胁敏感性的测量值相发散。研究结果说明了如何为人格障碍的生物行为风险研究配置 AMPD 特质。