• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

佐治亚州的堕胎限制:对寻求堕胎者的预期影响。

Abortion restrictions in the state of Georgia: Anticipated impact on people seeking abortion.

机构信息

Emory University School of Medicine, Division of Family Planning, 49 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive SE, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2021 Feb;103(2):121-126. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2020.10.010
PMID:33075334
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the impact of restrictive abortion policies in the state of Georgia on the lives of people seeking abortion and how they would manage unwanted pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cross sectional study of English and Spanish-speaking people seeking abortion from three high-volume outpatient abortion clinics in Atlanta, Georgia from April 2019 through August 2019. Participants completed a multiple-choice questionnaire. We used bivariable and multivariable analysis to explore relationships between demographic characteristics and how people would manage their unwanted pregnancies if abortion were illegal in the state. Two researchers (EC and SC) conducted qualitative analysis on free response answers and coded them by key emotion.

RESULTS

Of the 382 participants, 312 (81.9%) considered at least one way to end their pregnancy if abortion were illegal in Georgia: 252 (66.1%) by traveling to another state, 85 (22.3%) by self-management with medications and/or herbs, and 32 (8.4%) considered self-harm behaviors. When asked how they would feel about not being able to have a desired abortion, 94% reported negative emotions, ranging from "scared" to "enslaved."

CONCLUSIONS

Limiting access to legal abortion in Georgia would negatively impact the lives of people seeking abortion and has the potential to drive individuals to seek more costly and risky alternatives to end their pregnancy.

IMPLICATIONS

Restricting abortion in Georgia may cause medically unnecessary delays in care, increased travel time, cost and negative emotional responses to people seeking abortion. Mitigating strategies include legislative challenges to restrictive laws as well as harm reduction education.

摘要

目的

探讨佐治亚州的限制性堕胎政策对寻求堕胎的人们的生活的影响,以及他们将如何应对意外怀孕。

研究设计

我们对 2019 年 4 月至 8 月期间在佐治亚州亚特兰大的三家高容量门诊堕胎诊所寻求堕胎的讲英语和西班牙语的人进行了横断面研究。参与者完成了多项选择问卷。我们使用双变量和多变量分析来探讨人口统计学特征与如果该州堕胎非法人们将如何管理意外怀孕之间的关系。两名研究人员(EC 和 SC)对自由回答的答案进行了定性分析,并按关键情绪对其进行了编码。

结果

在 382 名参与者中,有 312 名(81.9%)考虑了如果在佐治亚州堕胎非法至少一种结束妊娠的方法:252 名(66.1%)通过前往另一个州,85 名(22.3%)通过自行用药和/或草药管理,32 名(8.4%)考虑了自我伤害行为。当被问及无法进行所需的堕胎时,他们会有何感受,94%的人报告了负面情绪,从“害怕”到“被奴役”。

结论

限制佐治亚州的合法堕胎会对寻求堕胎的人们的生活产生负面影响,并有可能促使个人寻求更昂贵和风险更高的替代方案来终止妊娠。

意义

在佐治亚州限制堕胎可能会导致不必要的医疗延误,增加旅行时间,成本以及对寻求堕胎的人们产生负面情绪反应。减轻策略包括对限制性法律进行立法挑战以及减少伤害的教育。

相似文献

1
Abortion restrictions in the state of Georgia: Anticipated impact on people seeking abortion.佐治亚州的堕胎限制:对寻求堕胎者的预期影响。
Contraception. 2021 Feb;103(2):121-126. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
2
Cross-country abortion travel to England and Wales: results from a cross-sectional survey exploring people's experiences crossing borders to obtain care.跨境堕胎旅行至英格兰和威尔士:一项横断面调查研究人们跨境获取医疗服务的经验
Reprod Health. 2021 May 22;18(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01158-z.
3
Abortion beyond 13 weeks in Argentina: healthcare seeking experiences during self-managed abortion accompanied by the Socorristas en Red.阿根廷 13 周以上的堕胎:由 Red 援助者陪伴的自我管理堕胎期间的医疗保健寻求经历。
Reprod Health. 2022 Aug 26;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01488-6.
4
"The right thing to do would be to provide care… and we can't": Provider experiences with Georgia's 22-week abortion ban.“正确的做法应该是提供护理……但我们做不到”:提供者在佐治亚州22周堕胎禁令下的经历。
Contraception. 2023 Aug;124:110059. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110059. Epub 2023 May 7.
5
Barriers and delays in access to abortion care: a cross-sectional study of people traveling to obtain care in England and the Netherlands from European countries where abortion is legal on broad grounds.获取堕胎护理的障碍和延迟:一项横断面研究,研究对象为从广泛允许堕胎的欧洲国家前往英格兰和荷兰获取堕胎护理的人。
Reprod Health. 2024 Jan 15;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01729-2.
6
"I'll just deal with this on my own": a qualitative exploration of experiences with self-managed abortion in the United States.“我将独自处理这件事”:对美国自主堕胎经历的定性探索。
Reprod Health. 2021 May 4;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01142-7.
7
Women's abortion seeking behavior under restrictive abortion laws in Mexico.墨西哥限制堕胎法下的妇女堕胎寻求行为。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 27;14(12):e0226522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226522. eCollection 2019.
8
"I need to terminate this pregnancy even if it will take my life": a qualitative study of the effect of being denied legal abortion on women's lives in Nepal.“即便会危及生命,我也需要终止此次妊娠”:一项关于尼泊尔妇女被拒绝合法堕胎对其生活影响的定性研究
BMC Womens Health. 2015 Oct 14;15:85. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0241-y.
9
Perspectives on an early abortion ban in a restrictive US state: A qualitative exploration.美国一限制堕胎州拟禁止早期堕胎:定性探索
Contraception. 2023 Jul;123:110025. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110025. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
10
Women's experiences seeking abortion care shortly after the closure of clinics due to a restrictive law in Texas.在得克萨斯州一项限制性法律导致诊所关闭后不久,女性寻求堕胎护理的经历。
Contraception. 2016 Apr;93(4):292-297. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Reproductive and Social Policies, Sociopolitical Stress, and Implications for Maternal and Child Health Equity.生殖与社会政策、社会政治压力,及其对母婴健康公平的影响。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2024 Jun;11(2):279-287. doi: 10.1007/s40572-024-00443-w. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
2
Association Between Rates of Down Syndrome Diagnosis in States With vs Without 20-Week Abortion Bans From 2011 to 2018.2011 年至 2018 年期间,有与没有 20 周堕胎禁令的州之间唐氏综合征诊断率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233684. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3684.
3
"": Opportunities and challenges for full spectrum care among doulas in Georgia.
《佐治亚州导乐全方位护理的机遇与挑战》
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Mar 1;4:966208. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.966208. eCollection 2023.
4
Estimation of Multiyear Consequences for Abortion Access in Georgia Under a Law Limiting Abortion to Early Pregnancy.在限制堕胎仅限于早孕的法律下,对格鲁吉亚堕胎机会的多年后果进行估计。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231598. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1598.
5
The COVID-19 pandemic's impact on sexual and reproductive health in Georgia, USA: An exploration of behaviors, contraceptive care, and partner abuse.美国佐治亚州 COVID-19 大流行对性健康和生殖健康的影响:对性行为、避孕护理和伴侣虐待的探索。
Contraception. 2022 Sep;113:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 Apr 27.