• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体积极情绪及其他:一项综合综述与未来研究议程

Group Positive Affect and Beyond: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda.

作者信息

Peñalver Jonathan, Salanova Marisa, Martínez Isabel M

机构信息

Department of Education, Universidad Internacional de Valencia, 21, 46002 Valencia, Spain.

WANT Research Team, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 15;17(20):7499. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207499.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17207499
PMID:33076327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7602542/
Abstract

Group positive affect is defined as homogeneous positive affect among group members that emerges when working together. Considering that previous research has shown a significant relationship between group positive affect and a wide variety of group outcomes (e.g., behaviors, wellbeing, and performance), it is crucial to boost our knowledge about this construct in the work context. The main purpose is to review empirical research, to synthesize the findings and to provide research agenda about group positive affect, in order to better understand this construct. Through the PsycNET and Proquest Central databases, an integrative review was conducted to identify articles about group positive affect published between January 1990 and March 2019. A total of 44 articles were included and analyzed. Finding suggests that scholars have been more interested in understanding the outcomes of group positive affect and how to improve the productivity of groups than in knowing what the antecedents are. A summary conclusion is that group positive affect is related to leadership, job demands, job resources, diversity/similarity, group processes, and contextual factors, all of which influence the development of several outcomes and different types of wellbeing at the individual and group levels. However, with specific combinations of other conditions (e.g., group trust, negative affect, and interaction), high levels of group positive affect could cause harmful results. Conclusions shed light on group positive affect research and practice and might help Human Resources professionals to initiate empirically-based strategies related to recruitment, group design and leadership training.

摘要

群体积极情绪被定义为群体成员在共同工作时所表现出的一致的积极情绪。鉴于先前的研究表明群体积极情绪与各种各样的群体结果(如行为、幸福感和绩效)之间存在显著关系,在工作背景下增进我们对这一概念的了解至关重要。主要目的是回顾实证研究,综合研究结果,并提供关于群体积极情绪的研究议程,以便更好地理解这一概念。通过PsycNET和Proquest Central数据库,进行了一项综合综述,以识别1990年1月至2019年3月期间发表的关于群体积极情绪的文章。总共纳入并分析了44篇文章。研究结果表明,学者们对理解群体积极情绪的结果以及如何提高群体生产力比了解其前因更感兴趣。一个总结性结论是,群体积极情绪与领导力、工作要求、工作资源、多样性/相似性、群体过程和情境因素有关,所有这些因素都会影响个体和群体层面多种结果的发展以及不同类型的幸福感。然而,在其他条件(如群体信任、消极情绪和互动)的特定组合下,高水平的群体积极情绪可能会导致有害结果。这些结论为群体积极情绪的研究和实践提供了启示,可能有助于人力资源专业人员制定基于实证的招聘、团队设计和领导力培训策略。

相似文献

1
Group Positive Affect and Beyond: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda.群体积极情绪及其他:一项综合综述与未来研究议程
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 15;17(20):7499. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207499.
2
Happy-Productive Teams and Work Units: A Systematic Review of the 'Happy-Productive Worker Thesis'.快乐-高效团队和工作单元:对“快乐-高效员工假设”的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 20;17(1):69. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010069.
3
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
4
Work environment antecedents of bullying: A review and integrative model applied to registered nurses.欺凌行为的工作环境前因:一项应用于注册护士的综述与整合模型
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Mar;55:85-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
5
Antecedents, mediators, and outcomes of authentic leadership in healthcare: A systematic review.医疗保健领域真实领导的前因、中介和结果:系统综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jul;83:34-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
6
Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.职业心理社会因素与冠心病流行病学的方法学和概念性问题
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):251-5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
7
Work engagement in nursing: an integrative review of the literature.护士工作投入:文献综合评价。
J Nurs Manag. 2016 Mar;24(2):E101-11. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12312. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
8
Organizational contextual features that influence the implementation of evidence-based practices across healthcare settings: a systematic integrative review.影响医疗保健环境中实施基于证据的实践的组织背景特征:系统综合评价。
Syst Rev. 2018 May 5;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0734-5.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Work engagement in professional nursing practice: A systematic review.专业护理实践中的工作投入:一项系统综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Sep;61:142-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality, dietary identity, mental and sleep health in vegans and vegetarians: A preliminary cross-sectional study.纯素食者和素食者的人格、饮食特征、心理与睡眠健康:一项初步横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 22;6(8):e1525. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1525. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Positive affect and job performance in psychiatric nurses: A moderated mediation analysis.积极情绪与精神科护士工作绩效的关系:一个有调节的中介分析。
Nurs Open. 2023 May;10(5):3064-3074. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1553. Epub 2022 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Happy-Productive Teams and Work Units: A Systematic Review of the 'Happy-Productive Worker Thesis'.快乐-高效团队和工作单元:对“快乐-高效员工假设”的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 20;17(1):69. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010069.
2
The Happy-Productive Worker Model and Beyond: Patterns of Wellbeing and Performance at Work.快乐-产出型员工模型及其他:工作中的幸福感和绩效模式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 6;16(3):479. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030479.
3
Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.
工作需求-资源理论:总结与展望。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):273-285. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000056. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
4
Integrative review: what is it? How to do it?整合性综述:它是什么?如何进行?
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2010 Mar;8(1):102-6. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082010RW1134.
5
Emotional collectives: How groups shape emotions and emotions shape groups.情感群体:群体如何塑造情感以及情感如何塑造群体。
Cogn Emot. 2016;30(1):3-19. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1081349. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
6
Positive affective tone and team performance: The moderating role of collective emotional skills.积极情感基调与团队绩效:集体情绪技能的调节作用。
Cogn Emot. 2016;30(1):167-82. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1043857. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
7
Why Systematic Review rather than Narrative Review?为什么是系统评价而不是叙述性综述?
Psychiatry Investig. 2015 Jul;12(3):417-9. doi: 10.4306/pi.2015.12.3.417. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
8
From "we" to "me": Group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being.从“我们”到“我”:群体认同增强了感知到的个人控制感,并对健康和幸福产生影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Jul;109(1):53-74. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000019. Epub 2015 May 4.
9
Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance.积极通常是好的,消极并不总是坏的:群体影响对社会融合和任务表现的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1214-27. doi: 10.1037/apl0000006. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
10
The magic of collective emotional intelligence in learning groups: No guys needed for the spell!学习小组中集体情商的魔力:施展魔法无需男生!
Br J Psychol. 2015 May;106(2):217-34. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12075. Epub 2014 Jun 6.