• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旨在减少荷兰社会经济健康不平等的成功综合社区方法的关键要素:一项定性研究。

Key elements of a successful integrated community-based approach aimed at reducing socioeconomic health inequalities in the Netherlands: A qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Healthy Society, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240757. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0240757
PMID:33079952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7575081/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2010, the Zwolle Healthy City approach, an integrated community-based approach, has been implemented in the Dutch municipality of Zwolle. This approach is proven successful in reducing health inequalities. However, the key elements of this approach are not clear. The current study aimed to identify key elements of this successful local community-based approach, according to the perspectives of various stakeholders.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 29 professionals who were involved in the approach in the period 2010-2018 and have occupations at the strategic (n = 4), tactical (n = 17) and operational level (n = 8). Data was analyzed using the thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

We identified nine perceived key elements that contributed to the success of the approach aimed at reducing socioeconomic health inequalities. The respondents indicated the following key elements: (1) collaboration between a variety of local organizations that want to have impact on the health of citizens; (2) support for the approach on the strategic, tactical and operational level of involved organizations; (3) proper communication and coordination, both for the network and within the organizations; (4) embeddedness in organizations' policies and processes and (5) collaboration with private organizations is of added value, although there is no "one size fits all". Other key elements are (6) collaboration with citizens, (7) profiling the approach like a brand and (8) moving along with and taking advantage of opportunities. Finally, (9) continuous monitoring and evaluating goals and processes, and learning from the results, is important.

CONCLUSION

Nine key elements were identified that, according to various stakeholders, contributed to the success of the Zwolle Healthy City approach. These insights are important to further strengthen the Zwolle Healthy City approach but may also help and inspire other local integrated community-based approaches aimed at reducing socioeconomic health inequalities, to improve and adapt the approach within their specific local and dynamic context.

摘要

背景

自 2010 年以来,荷兰兹沃勒市实施了一种综合的基于社区的方法——兹沃勒健康城市方法。该方法已被证明在减少健康不平等方面取得了成功。然而,该方法的关键要素尚不清楚。本研究旨在根据不同利益相关者的观点,确定这一成功的地方社区方法的关键要素。

方法

对 2010 年至 2018 年间参与该方法的 29 名专业人员进行了半结构化访谈,这些专业人员的职业分布在战略层面(n=4)、战术层面(n=17)和操作层面(n=8)。采用主题分析方法对数据进行分析。

结果

我们确定了九个被认为是该方法成功的关键要素,这些要素旨在减少社会经济健康不平等。受访者指出了以下关键要素:(1)各种希望对公民健康产生影响的当地组织之间的合作;(2)在参与组织的战略、战术和操作层面上对该方法的支持;(3)适当的沟通和协调,既在网络内部,也在组织内部;(4)嵌入组织的政策和流程中;(5)与私营组织的合作具有附加价值,尽管没有“一刀切”的方法。其他关键要素是(6)与公民的合作,(7)将方法描绘成一个品牌,(8)随着机会的出现而前进并利用这些机会。最后,(9)不断监测和评估目标和流程,并从结果中学习,这一点很重要。

结论

根据不同的利益相关者,确定了九个有助于兹沃勒健康城市方法成功的关键要素。这些见解对于进一步加强兹沃勒健康城市方法很重要,但也可能为其他旨在减少社会经济健康不平等的地方综合社区方法提供帮助和启发,以改善和调整其在特定地方和动态环境下的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d1b/7575081/04b0cfde48fa/pone.0240757.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d1b/7575081/04b0cfde48fa/pone.0240757.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d1b/7575081/04b0cfde48fa/pone.0240757.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Key elements of a successful integrated community-based approach aimed at reducing socioeconomic health inequalities in the Netherlands: A qualitative study.旨在减少荷兰社会经济健康不平等的成功综合社区方法的关键要素:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240757. eCollection 2020.
2
Mechanisms and contextual factors related to key elements of a successful integrated community-based approach aimed at reducing socioeconomic health inequalities in the Netherlands: A realist evaluation perspective.与旨在减少荷兰社会经济健康不平等的成功综合社区方法的关键要素相关的机制和背景因素:从现实评估角度来看。
PLoS One. 2023 May 17;18(5):e0284903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284903. eCollection 2023.
3
Cross-sector collaboration to reduce health inequalities: a qualitative study of local collaboration between health care, social services, and other sectors under health system reforms in England.跨部门合作减少健康不平等:英格兰卫生系统改革下医疗保健、社会服务和其他部门之间地方合作的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2613. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20089-5.
4
Evaluation of the promising neighbourhoods community program to reduce health inequalities in youth: a protocol of a mixed-methods study.评价“有前途的邻里社区”项目减少青年健康不平等状况的效果:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 14;19(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6901-3.
5
How can health systems approach reducing health inequalities? An in-depth qualitative case study in the UK.卫生系统如何着手减少健康不平等?英国的一项深入定性案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 10;24(1):2168. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19531-5.
6
How to improve collaboration between the public health sector and other policy sectors to reduce health inequalities? - A study in sixteen municipalities in the Netherlands.如何改善公共卫生部门与其他政策部门之间的合作以减少健康不平等现象?——荷兰十六个市镇的一项研究
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jun 22;15:97. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0384-y.
7
Barriers to and Facilitators of the Evaluation of Integrated Community-Wide Overweight Intervention Approaches: A Qualitative Case Study in Two Dutch Municipalities.社区范围内综合超重干预方法评估的障碍与促进因素:荷兰两个城市的定性案例研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Mar 31;13(4):390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13040390.
8
Obstacles and opportunities for monitoring ethnicity-based inequalities in maternal health care: Lessons from Mexico.监测基于种族的产妇保健不平等的障碍和机遇:来自墨西哥的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217557. eCollection 2019.
9
"I would love to see these big institutions… throwing their weight around": qualitative findings regarding health and social sector collaborations to address community-level socioeconomic adversity.“我非常希望看到这些大型机构……发挥他们的影响力”:关于解决社区层面社会经济不利因素的卫生和社会部门合作的定性研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 29;24(1):2020. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19465-y.
10
Searching for new community engagement approaches in the Netherlands: a realist qualitative study.在荷兰寻找新的社区参与方法:一项现实主义定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08616-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Process evaluation of an integrated community-based intervention for promoting health equity in children in a new residential development area.对一个新住宅区促进儿童健康公平的综合社区干预措施进行过程评估。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Feb 6;82(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01246-z.
2
The development of an integrated neighborhood approach for health promotion and prevention: a qualitative exploration of stakeholders' views.发展促进健康和预防的综合邻里方法:利益攸关方观点的定性探索。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Nov 28;21(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01077-4.
3
Implementation of an integrated community approach in deprived neighbourhoods: a theory-based process evaluation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

本文引用的文献

1
Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review.实现成功的社区参与:一项快速现实主义综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 13;18(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1.
2
Neighbourhood food environments: food choice, foodscapes and planning for health.邻里食品环境:食品选择、食品景观与健康规划。
Proc Nutr Soc. 2018 Aug;77(3):239-246. doi: 10.1017/S0029665118000022. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
3
Examining health literacy disparities in the United States: a third look at the National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL).
在贫困社区实施综合社区方法:使用整合实施研究框架 (CFIR) 的基于理论的过程评估。
Scand J Public Health. 2024 Nov;52(7):838-848. doi: 10.1177/14034948231199804. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
4
Mechanisms and contextual factors related to key elements of a successful integrated community-based approach aimed at reducing socioeconomic health inequalities in the Netherlands: A realist evaluation perspective.与旨在减少荷兰社会经济健康不平等的成功综合社区方法的关键要素相关的机制和背景因素:从现实评估角度来看。
PLoS One. 2023 May 17;18(5):e0284903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284903. eCollection 2023.
5
Involving Children in Creating a Healthy Environment in Low Socioeconomic Position (SEP) Neighborhoods in The Netherlands: A Participatory Action Research (PAR) Project.在荷兰社会经济地位较低(SEP)社区中让儿童参与创造健康环境:一项参与式行动研究(PAR)项目。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 19;18(22):12131. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212131.
审视美国的健康素养差异:第三次审视成人识字能力国家评估(NAAL)。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 13;16(1):975. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3621-9.
4
Unravelling the factors decisive to the implementation of EPODE-derived community approaches targeting childhood obesity: a longitudinal, multiple case study.剖析决定实施以EPODE为基础的针对儿童肥胖的社区方法的因素:一项纵向多案例研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Sep 5;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0423-5.
5
Community-based pilot intervention to tackle childhood obesity: a whole-system approach.基于社区的儿童肥胖症试点干预措施:一种全系统方法。
Public Health. 2016 Nov;140:109-118. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
6
Tackling Health Inequities and Reducing Obesity Prevalence: The EPODE Community-Based Approach.应对健康不平等问题并降低肥胖患病率:基于社区的EPODE方法。
Ann Nutr Metab. 2016;68 Suppl 2:35-8. doi: 10.1159/000446223. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
7
Challenges Faced by Social Workers as Members of Interprofessional Collaborative Health Care Teams.社会工作者作为跨专业协作医疗团队成员所面临的挑战。
Health Soc Work. 2016 May;41(2):101-9. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlw006.
8
Traversing myths and mountains: addressing socioeconomic inequities in the promotion of nutrition and physical activity behaviours.穿越神话与高山:解决促进营养与身体活动行为方面的社会经济不平等问题。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Nov 14;12:142. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0303-4.
9
Obesity and the potential reduction of social inequalities in mortality: evidence from 21 European populations.肥胖与死亡率方面社会不平等现象的潜在减少:来自21个欧洲人群的证据。
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Oct;25(5):849-56. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv090. Epub 2015 May 25.
10
The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis.社区参与对弱势群体公共卫生干预措施的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 12;15:129. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1352-y.