Zhang Li, Zhao Xiao-Peng, Qiao Li-Juan, Wei Wan-Xia, Wei Min, Ding Jin, Li Ying-Dong
The Third Ward of Cardiovascular Clinical Medical Center, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine.
Evidence-Based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 16;99(42):e22710. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022710.
Exercise therapies has been shown to be safe and effective as a non-pharmacological management for treating heart failure, At the same time, many clinical trials, systematic review, and meta-analyses have demonstrated the advantages of exercise therapies in heart failure. However, the methodological quality of these systematic reviews and the differences in efficacy between different exercise modes are unclear. Therefore, this study intends to overview of systematic reviews and network meta-analysis of exercise therapies intervention in heart failure, and finally to rank the effects of exercise therapies in the intervention of heart failure, so as to provide certain reference for clinical decision-making.
From the seven databases: PubMed, EMBASE.com, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Chinese biomedical literature database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan fang Database, and Chongqing VIP (CQVIP) databases. To search for systematic or meta-analysis of different exercise therapies for heart failure from inception to August 2020. According to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, the two researchers independently selected articles and extracted data. In case of differences, a third party shall be sought for settlement. The AMSTAR2 scale, PRISMA scale and GRADE were used to assess the quality and evidence grade of the literature. The eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected from the included systematic reviews and updated RCTs from the above systematic reviews to August 2020. GRADE was used for the risk of bias of the included RCTs. Pairwise meta-analyses were performed using the random-effects model, and network meta-analysis of the included RCTs were performed the frequentist framework. All data analyses were completed in Stata 15.0.
Finally, a total of 33 articles related to systematic review and meta-analysis were included, there are 28 articles in Chinese and 5 articles in English. The results of this overview and network meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.
This review will provide a comprehensive overview of existing systematic reviews of exercise therapies interventions for heart failure and provide recommendations for clinical practice or guidelines.
INPLASY202080118.
运动疗法已被证明作为治疗心力衰竭的非药物管理方法是安全有效的。同时,许多临床试验、系统评价和荟萃分析已经证明了运动疗法在心力衰竭中的优势。然而,这些系统评价的方法学质量以及不同运动模式之间的疗效差异尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在对心力衰竭运动疗法干预的系统评价和网络荟萃分析进行概述,最终对运动疗法在心力衰竭干预中的效果进行排序,以便为临床决策提供一定参考。
从七个数据库:PubMed、EMBASE.com、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库和重庆维普(CQVIP)数据库中,检索从建库至2020年8月关于心力衰竭不同运动疗法的系统评价或荟萃分析。根据纳入标准和排除标准,两名研究人员独立筛选文章并提取数据。如有分歧,将寻求第三方解决。采用AMSTAR2量表、PRISMA量表和GRADE对文献质量和证据等级进行评估。从纳入的系统评价中选择合格的随机对照试验(RCT),并更新上述系统评价至2020年8月的RCT。采用GRADE对纳入的RCT进行偏倚风险评估。采用随机效应模型进行成对荟萃分析,采用频率学派框架对纳入的RCT进行网络荟萃分析。所有数据分析均在Stata 15.0中完成。
最终,共纳入33篇与系统评价和荟萃分析相关的文章,其中中文28篇,英文5篇。本概述和网络荟萃分析的结果将提交给同行评审期刊发表。
本综述将全面概述现有关于心力衰竭运动疗法干预的系统评价,并为临床实践或指南提供建议。
INPLASY202080118