• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种比较治疗抵抗性精神分裂症患者精神保健服务提供的方法。

A Method to Compare the Delivery of Psychiatric Care for People with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia.

机构信息

Psychiatry Department, Institutd' Investigació Biomèdica-Sant Pau (IIB-SANT PAU), Hospital de la Santa CreuiSant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain.

CIBERSAM, Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium on Mental Health, 28029 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 16;17(20):7527. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207527.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17207527
PMID:33081208
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7589763/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Community services are gaining ground when it comes to attention to patients with psychiatric diseases. Regarding patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), the use of information and communication technology (ICT) could help to shift the focus from hospital-centered attention to community services. This study compares the differences in mental health services provided for patients with TRS in Budapest (Hungary), Tel-Aviv (Israel) and Catalonia (Spain) by means of a method for the quick appraisal of gaps among the three places, for a potential implementation of the same ICT tool in these regions.

METHODS

An adapted version of the Description and Standardised Evaluation of Services and Directories in Europe for Long Term Care (DESDE-LTC) instrument was made by researchers in Semmelweis University (Budapest, Hungary), Gertner Institute (Tel-Aviv, Israel) and Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau and Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (Catalonia, Spain).

RESULTS

Two types of outpatient care services were available in the three regions. Only one type of day-care facility was common in the whole study area. Two residential care services, one for acute and the other for non-acute patients were available in every region. Finally, two self-care and volunteer-care facilities were available in the three places.

CONCLUSION

Although the availability of services was different in each region, most of the services provided were sufficiently similar to allow the implementation of the same ICT solution in the three places.

摘要

简介

社区服务在关注精神疾病患者方面越来越受到重视。对于治疗抵抗性精神分裂症(TRS)患者,信息和通信技术(ICT)的使用有助于将注意力从以医院为中心的服务转移到社区服务。本研究通过一种快速评估三地之间差距的方法,比较了布达佩斯(匈牙利)、特拉维夫(以色列)和加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)三地为 TRS 患者提供的精神卫生服务的差异,以便在这些地区实施相同的 ICT 工具。

方法

研究者在塞梅尔维斯大学(匈牙利布达佩斯)、格特纳研究所(以色列特拉维夫)和圣十字圣保罗医院和圣若望德乌医院和圣保禄医疗中心(西班牙加泰罗尼亚)制作了一个经过改编的描述和标准化评估服务及长期护理目录(DESDE-LTC)工具的版本。

结果

三个地区都有两种类型的门诊护理服务。整个研究区域只有一种日间护理设施是共同的。每个地区都有两种住院护理服务,一种是急性患者,另一种是非急性患者。最后,三个地方都有两种自我护理和志愿者护理设施。

结论

尽管每个地区的服务提供情况不同,但提供的大多数服务足够相似,允许在这三个地区实施相同的 ICT 解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/048e/7589763/7f0485aa0e4b/ijerph-17-07527-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/048e/7589763/7f0485aa0e4b/ijerph-17-07527-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/048e/7589763/7f0485aa0e4b/ijerph-17-07527-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Method to Compare the Delivery of Psychiatric Care for People with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia.一种比较治疗抵抗性精神分裂症患者精神保健服务提供的方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 16;17(20):7527. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207527.
2
Mobile therapeutic attention for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (m-RESIST): a prospective multicentre feasibility study protocol in patients and their caregivers.针对难治性精神分裂症的移动治疗关注(m-RESIST):一项针对患者及其照料者的前瞻性多中心可行性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 16;8(7):e021346. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021346.
3
m-RESIST, a Mobile Therapeutic Intervention for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability Study.m-RESIST,一种用于难治性精神分裂症的移动治疗干预措施:可行性、可接受性和可用性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jun 30;7:e46179. doi: 10.2196/46179.
4
Standard comparison of local mental health care systems in eight European countries.八个欧洲国家地方精神卫生保健系统的标准比较。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Apr;28(2):210-223. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000415. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
5
Provision of services for people with schizophrenia in five European regions.为欧洲五个地区的精神分裂症患者提供服务。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2002 Oct;37(10):465-74. doi: 10.1007/s00127-002-0591-2.
6
A Semiautomated Classification System for Producing Service Directories in Social and Health Care (DESDE-AND): Maturity Assessment Study.社会和医疗保健服务目录生成的半自动分类系统(DESDE-AND):成熟度评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 15;23(3):e24930. doi: 10.2196/24930.
7
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
8
[Psychiatric care in Sachsen-Anhalt: a survey of institutions and services with the "European Services Mapping Schedule" ESMS].[萨克森-安哈尔特州的精神科护理:使用“欧洲服务映射表”(ESMS)对机构和服务进行的调查]
Psychiatr Prax. 2001 Nov;28(8):393-401. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18616.
9
Community emergency psychiatric service in Israel: a one-year experience.以色列的社区紧急精神科服务:一年的经验
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2009;46(3):207-12.
10
Patterns of mental healthcare provision in rural areas: A demonstration study in Australia and Europe.农村地区的心理卫生保健服务模式:澳大利亚和欧洲的一项示范研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 6;14:993197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.993197. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential Increasing Trend in Schizophrenia Relapse Prevention in the Past 40 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis.过去 40 年中精神分裂症复发预防的潜在增长趋势:文献计量分析。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2024 Sep;57(5):421-434. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.24.201. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
2
mHealth in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe: A systematic review comparing the use and availability of mHealth approaches in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe.撒哈拉以南非洲和欧洲的移动健康:一项比较撒哈拉以南非洲和欧洲移动健康方法的使用情况及可得性的系统评价
Digit Health. 2023 Jun 21;9:20552076231180972. doi: 10.1177/20552076231180972. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Standardised description of health and social care: A systematic review of use of the ESMS/DESDE (European Service Mapping Schedule/Description and Evaluation of Services and DirectoriEs).健康和社会保健的标准化描述:对 ESMS/DESDE(欧洲服务映射时间表/服务和目录描述与评估)使用情况的系统评价。
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;61:97-110. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
2
The balance of adult mental health care: provision of core health versus other types of care in eight European countries.成人精神卫生保健的平衡:在八个欧洲国家提供核心保健与其他类型保健。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Oct 17;29:e6. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000574.
3
Magnitude of terminological bias in international health services research: a disambiguation analysis in mental health.
国际卫生服务研究中术语偏见的程度:心理健康中的消歧分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022 Aug 22;31:e59. doi: 10.1017/S2045796022000403.
Mobile therapeutic attention for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (m-RESIST): a prospective multicentre feasibility study protocol in patients and their caregivers.
针对难治性精神分裂症的移动治疗关注(m-RESIST):一项针对患者及其照料者的前瞻性多中心可行性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 16;8(7):e021346. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021346.
4
The Impact of Repeated Assessments by Patients and Professionals: A 4-Year Follow-Up of a Population With Schizophrenia.患者和专业人员重复评估的影响:一项为期 4 年的精神分裂症人群随访研究。
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2019 May/Jun;25(3):189-199. doi: 10.1177/1078390318777785. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
5
A Comparison of Mental Health Care Systems in Northern and Southern Europe: A Service Mapping Study.北欧和南欧的精神卫生保健系统比较:一项服务映射研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 31;15(6):1133. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061133.
6
What is the risk-benefit ratio of long-term antipsychotic treatment in people with schizophrenia?精神分裂症患者长期使用抗精神病药物治疗的风险效益比是多少?
World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):149-160. doi: 10.1002/wps.20516.
7
Double disparities in the health care for people with schizophrenia of an ethnic-national minority.一个少数民族中精神分裂症患者医疗保健方面的双重差异。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017 Oct 15;6(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13584-017-0166-z.
8
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Peer-Delivered and Technology Supported Self-Management Intervention for Older Adults with Serious Mental Illness.基于同伴提供和技术支持的自我管理干预对老年严重精神障碍患者的可行性、可接受性和初步有效性。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Jun;89(2):293-305. doi: 10.1007/s11126-017-9534-7.
9
Standard comparison of local mental health care systems in eight European countries.八个欧洲国家地方精神卫生保健系统的标准比较。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Apr;28(2):210-223. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000415. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
10
Symptoms, circumstances, and service systems: Pathways to psychiatric crisis service use among uninsured young adults.症状、情况和服务系统:无保险的年轻成年人使用精神科危机服务的途径。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2017;87(5):585-596. doi: 10.1037/ort0000218. Epub 2016 Oct 24.